AI analysis revealed 576 average junk food ads per match, with Coca-Cola, McDonald's, and Powerade dominating pitchside boards during live play. Junk food promotion appeared 10 times more frequently than gambling ads and 25 times more than cryptocurrency, raising concerns about childhood obesity normalization.
World Cup fans bombarded with 65,000 junk food ads during matches
Sport should be part of the solution, not the advertising platform for the problem.
So the researchers used AI to count ads during live play. How confident are we in that number—65,000 times?
The University of Bristol and Oxford teams built the tool specifically to track visible logos on pitchside boards and stadium signage during the international broadcast feed. It's a systematic approach, and they're peer-reviewed institutions. The number is what the AI detected.
But AI can miss things or miscount. The study doesn't tell us the margin of error. And they're only counting what was visible on the international feed—not regional variations or what appeared in different countries' broadcast angles.
Fair point. So 28 hours of ads visible—that's about 16 percent of match time. Is that a lot?
For context, that's roughly 16 minutes per match on average. When you think about a 90-minute game, that's substantial. And it's not including halftime commercials or pre-match coverage.
Right, but we should be clear: this is time during which junk food logos were visible somewhere on screen. It doesn't mean viewers were staring at them the whole time. The visibility and the attention are different things.
The study says junk food ads appeared ten times more than gambling ads. Why is that comparison important?
Because gambling advertising has faced increasing restrictions in many countries. If we're treating gambling as harmful enough to regulate, the researchers are asking why junk food—which contributes to obesity, a documented public health crisis—gets ten times more visibility at the world's biggest sporting event.
That's a fair rhetorical point, but the comparison assumes gambling and junk food are equivalent harms. They're not the same thing. The comparison works as a relative measure, but it doesn't prove junk food should be restricted as heavily as gambling.
What about FIFA's response? They said the revenue goes back into football and health projects.
They mentioned the "Be Active" campaign and said they have governance frameworks for partners. But they didn't address the core finding—that 65,000 junk food ads were shown during matches.
And we don't know what FIFA's health spending actually is as a percentage of revenue, or how many people "Be Active" actually reaches. The statement is vague. It's a deflection, not a rebuttal.
The UK banned junk food ads before 9 p.m. starting in October 2025, but the World Cup ads don't fall under that ban because they're on physical boards at an international event.
Exactly. It's a loophole. Kids watching the World Cup in the UK see ads for burgers and crisps during hours when those same ads are banned on domestic television. The regulation doesn't account for international sporting events.
Though we should note: the ban is recent, and it's not clear yet how effective it's been at reducing childhood obesity. The World Cup loophole is real, but it's one piece of a much larger advertising ecosystem. Closing it wouldn't solve the problem alone.
The Pulse
- 65,722 junk food and drink logos visible during 104 World Cup matches in 2026
- 28.1 hours of total ad visibility across the tournament—16% of all match time
- Coca-Cola (21,893 appearances), McDonald's (13,915), Powerade (12,777), and Lay's (12,087) dominated
- 15% of UK children obese; 26% overweight as of 2024 NHS data
- UK junk food ad ban before 9 p.m. does not cover international sporting events
AI analysis revealed 576 average junk food ads per match, with Coca-Cola, McDonald's, and Powerade dominating pitchside boards during live play. Junk food promotion appeared 10 times more frequently than gambling ads and 25 times more than cryptocurrency, raising concerns about childhood obesity normalization.
Researchers found fans were exposed to over 28 hours of junk food advertising during the 2026 World Cup, with logos displayed 65,722 times across matches in USA, Canada, and Mexico.
During the 2026 World Cup, which took place across the United States, Canada, and Mexico, television viewers watching the tournament's 104 matches were exposed to a relentless stream of advertisements for unhealthy food and drinks. Researchers at the University of Bristol and University of Oxford used artificial intelligence to track every visible logo and product placement on pitchside boards and stadium signage during live play on the international broadcast feed. What they found was striking: junk food and beverage brands—defined by the UK government as products high in fat, salt, or sugar—appeared 65,722 times across the tournament. Those advertisements were visible for a combined 28.1 hours, representing just over 16 percent of all match time.
The scale of exposure was consistent throughout the competition. On average, each of the 104 matches contained approximately 576 visible advertisements for unhealthy food and drinks. Four brands dominated the landscape: Coca-Cola led with 21,893 appearances, followed by McDonald's with 13,915, Powerade with 12,777, and Lay's crisps with 12,087. All four are official FIFA partners, and Powerade is owned by the Coca-Cola Company. The advertisements appeared only during live play on the international feed—the version broadcast to every country with World Cup coverage—and did not include pre-match coverage, halftime commercial breaks, or the in-match hydration breaks that have drawn their own scrutiny.
When researchers compared junk food advertising to other forms of potentially harmful marketing, the disparity became even more pronounced. Logos for unhealthy food and drinks appeared roughly seven times more frequently than those for alcohol and prediction market brands, ten times more often than gambling firms, and nearly twenty-five times more often than cryptocurrency. The sheer volume raised concerns among public health experts about the normalization of these brands among viewers, particularly children. Researchers argue that repeatedly connecting unhealthy food and drink products with football, excitement, and national identity makes these brands feel familiar and acceptable, shaping consumption patterns before children develop critical judgment about marketing.
The findings highlight a significant regulatory gap. Since October 2025, the United Kingdom has banned advertisements for junk food on television before 9 p.m., a restriction designed to limit children's exposure during peak viewing hours. However, because the World Cup advertisements appeared on physical boards at an international sporting event rather than through traditional broadcast commercials, they fell outside the scope of that legislation. Viewers in the UK could see advertisements for burgers, crisps, and sugary drinks during hours when such ads are theoretically prohibited on domestic television. Greg Fell, president of the Association of Directors of Public Health, called this a clear loophole and emphasized that addressing the problem requires worldwide collaboration. He noted that governments around the globe are actively legislating to restrict junk food advertising, and that obesity has become comparable to tobacco as a public health crisis—with similar marketing tactics targeting children to expand future markets.
The timing of the research coincides with broader efforts to address childhood obesity in the UK. The government recently announced sweeping changes to school dinner rules, banning deep-fried foods and mandating increased inclusion of fruits, vegetables, fiber, and whole grains. According to NHS data from 2024, fifteen percent of children in the UK are obese, and twenty-six percent are overweight. Dr. Elisa Becker, one of the study's co-authors, framed the World Cup findings as a contradiction at the heart of global sports marketing. "Sport should be part of the solution to poor health," she said, "not one of the world's most powerful advertising platforms for the products driving it."
FIFA responded to the study by arguing that the vast majority of its revenue is reinvested into football, including projects promoting health and wellbeing that reach thousands of people. A FIFA spokesperson stated that the organization works with a broad portfolio of partners subject to governance and compliance frameworks, and highlighted the "Be Active" social impact campaign, which delivered messages of unity, inclusion, health, and friendship throughout the tournament. When BBC Sport contacted Coca-Cola, McDonald's, and PepsiCo—which owns Lay's—for comment, none of the companies responded. The study raises an unresolved question about whether international sporting events will face the same advertising restrictions that now apply to domestic broadcasts, or whether the current loophole will persist as obesity rates continue to climb globally.
Notable Quotes
Repeatedly connecting unhealthy food and drink brands with football, excitement and national identity can make these brands familiar and normalise their consumption.— University of Bristol and Oxford researchers
It is definitely a loophole. Advertising is one of the key mechanisms by which harm from obesity happens. Obesity is almost the new tobacco.— Greg Fell, president of the Association of Directors of Public Health