Witness refuses to implicate defendant in Tupac murder trial, citing street code

Tupac Shakur was killed in a drive-by shooting at age 25 in 1996; the case involves gang violence and ongoing community trauma.
I don't want to send him to prison, even though we don't like each other.
McDonald's testimony revealed the tension between legal obligation and street code in a case thirty years in the making.
Mark

Why would a witness refuse to answer questions under oath? Isn't that contempt of court?

Mimi

It is, technically. But McDonald was caught between two systems of law—the courtroom and the street. He was threatened with contempt, yes, but he was also bound by something older and, in his world, more binding.

Mark

But he said he doesn't even like Davis. So it's not loyalty to a friend.

Mimi

No, it's not personal loyalty. It's a code. In the 1990s gang world, talking to authorities—even about someone you dislike—marks you as a snitch. That carries consequences beyond any courtroom.

Mark

What kind of consequences?

Mimi

In that world, being known as someone who cooperates with police can get you killed. McDonald was part of that ecosystem. He knows what happened to people who break the code.

Mark

So thirty years later, the code still holds?

Mimi

Apparently. McDonald sat there conflicted, clearly uncomfortable, but he couldn't bring himself to do it. Even under oath, even facing contempt charges, the street code won.

Mark

Does that mean Davis walks free?

Mimi

Not necessarily. But it means the prosecution loses a crucial witness. And it shows how these old gang conflicts and codes can still shape outcomes in a modern courtroom.

  • A witness sat under oath in open court and flatly refused to answer questions that could incriminate the defendant, telling the defense attorney directly: 'I'm not going to send him to prison — you are.'
  • The refusal wasn't born of friendship — McDonald told Davis to his face that they don't like each other — but of a street code that has governed these communities since long before the 1996 shooting.
  • Prosecutors are attempting to convict Davis of orchestrating Shakur's murder based partly on Davis's own public statements and memoir, in which he claimed to have been in the vehicle and supplied the gun — claims he has since walked back.
  • A second witness, former security official Reggie Wright Jr., faced defense suggestions that he himself may have had motive, as his influence at Death Row Records grew substantially after the shooting.
  • The trial is pressing forward, but Tuesday's testimony made plain that the prosecution's greatest obstacle is not evidence — it is the decades-old silence of people who were there and have chosen to stay quiet.

Thirty years after Tupac Shakur was shot dead on a Las Vegas street, a Las Vegas courtroom is discovering what investigators long suspected: that the code of silence binding those who witnessed or knew of the killing may prove more durable than any legal oath. On Tuesday, witness James McDonald — a former Death Row Records enforcer — refused under oath to offer testimony that might condemn defendant Duane Davis, not out of loyalty or love, but out of a street ethic that predates the trial and may outlast it. The case raises an enduring question about whether justice, in its formal institutional sense, can reach into worlds governed by entirely different rules.

James McDonald arrived in the witness box on Tuesday morning with his arms crossed and his resistance visible. He was there because the court compelled him to be — not because he wanted to help anyone understand who killed Tupac Shakur. Across the room sat Duane 'Keffe D' Davis, the man prosecutors say orchestrated the 1996 drive-by shooting, stone-faced in a suit. Between them sat thirty years of silence and a street code that McDonald made clear he had no intention of breaking.

When Davis's own defense attorney pressed McDonald about who was responsible for Shakur's death, McDonald's frustration surfaced openly. He told the attorney he wasn't going to answer questions that could hurt Davis, then looked directly at the defendant and said he didn't want to send him to prison — even though the two men hold no affection for each other. It was a remarkable moment: a witness refusing to harm a man he doesn't like, simply because the code forbids it.

Shakur was twenty-five when he was shot leaving a Mike Tyson boxing match in Las Vegas on September 7, 1996. He died six days later, having refused — even bleeding in an ambulance — to identify his shooter. Prosecutors allege Davis ordered the attack after his nephew was beaten by Shakur earlier that evening, framing it as gang retaliation within the violent tensions of the 1990s hip-hop scene. McDonald, who testified he wasn't present at the shooting, described the period as a gang war in which Davis and his nephew were themselves targets.

Davis had, in earlier years, made the prosecution's task seem easier — he gave public interviews and co-authored a memoir in which he claimed to have been in the car and supplied the weapon. He has since retreated from those statements, saying portions of the book were fictionalised. A second witness, Reggie Wright Jr., a former member of Shakur's security detail, also testified Tuesday, with the defense suggesting he may have had his own motives — his role at Death Row Records expanded considerably after the shooting.

As McDonald left the stand, he addressed Davis one final time: 'What you are going through, brother, is what you going through. I don't want to be a part of it.' The trial continues, but Tuesday made clear what prosecutors are truly up against — not a lack of witnesses, but a code of silence that has held, unbroken, for three decades.

James McDonald sat in the witness box on Tuesday morning, visibly uncomfortable, his arms crossed against questions he did not want to answer. The man on trial for Tupac Shakur's murder—Duane "Keffe D" Davis—sat across the courtroom in a suit, stone-faced, while McDonald wrestled with a conflict that runs deeper than the law: the street code that forbids cooperation with authorities, even when you're under oath and threatened with contempt of court.

McDonald, a former enforcer at Death Row Records and member of the Mob Piru gang, had been forced to take the stand. He made clear from the start that he resented being there. When Davis's defense attorney Michael Sanft pressed him repeatedly about who was responsible for Shakur's death, McDonald's frustration boiled over. "You're asking me something that wouldn't be good for him," he said, pointing at Davis. "I'm not going to send him to prison, you are." He raised his voice and his arms, telling Sanft he didn't want to answer questions that could hurt the defendant. At one point, looking directly at Davis, he said: "I don't want to send him to prison, even though we don't like each other."

The tension in that moment captures something about this case that goes far beyond the courtroom. Shakur was gunned down in a drive-by shooting on a Las Vegas street on September 7, 1996—thirty years ago this month—just twenty-five years old, shot after a Mike Tyson boxing match. The murder has haunted American culture ever since, one of the most famous unsolved killings in the country's history. Prosecutors allege that Davis, a former leader of the South Side Compton Crips, orchestrated the shooting after his nephew Orlando Anderson got into a fight with Shakur hours earlier. They argue Davis believed the attack on his nephew could not go unanswered. But the case has always been shadowed by the street code that dominated the 1990s hip-hop scene—a code that said you don't talk to police, you don't cooperate with authorities, you handle things yourself. Shakur himself, bleeding in an ambulance after he was shot, refused to tell a police officer what happened. "We'll take care of it," he said instead. He died six days later without ever identifying his shooter.

McDonald testified that he was not present when Shakur was shot. But he acknowledged that those who were there—members of Shakur's entourage—had quickly communicated who was responsible. "It was a gang war," he said. "People were getting hurt. People were being sought." He described Davis and his nephew as being in the middle of that conflict, targets themselves. When his testimony ended, McDonald addressed Davis directly: "What you are going through brother is what you going through. I don't want to be a part of it."

Another witness, Reggie Wright Jr., who was part of Shakur's security detail and later became general manager of Death Row Records, also testified on Tuesday. Davis's defense team suggested that Wright, a former Compton police officer, might be the real culprit. They questioned him about his growing role at Death Row Records after Suge Knight—who was in the car with Shakur when he was shot—left the label. The implication was clear: Wright's position and influence expanded significantly after Knight's departure, and the label itself was valued at three million dollars.

Davis himself had actually brought much of this case into the open. Years after the shooting, he made public statements about it and co-authored a memoir in which he claimed to be a passenger in the vehicle that fired into Shakur's car and said he had supplied the gun. But he has since distanced himself from those claims, saying he didn't write all of the memoir and that parts were fictionalised to boost sales. The trial is expected to continue, but McDonald's testimony on Tuesday illustrated the central obstacle prosecutors face: a witness who knows things, who is under oath, who has been threatened with contempt, and who still refuses to break a code that has held for three decades.

You're asking me something that wouldn't be good for him. I'm not going to send him to prison, you are.
— James McDonald, witness, to the court
What you are going through brother is what you going through. I don't want to be a part of it.
— James McDonald, addressing defendant Duane Davis
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte? Das Original lesen bei BBC News ↗
Kontakt FAQ