On Christmas Eve, the head of the World Health Organisation named what was unfolding in Gaza's hospitals with quiet precision: a tragedy. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, speaking from an institution that has witnessed the fragility of healing systems across generations, described not a crisis in progress but a destruction already accomplished — of the infrastructure, the workforce, and the sanctuaries that human civilization has long agreed must be spared from war. His call for an immediate ceasefire was less a political demand than a medical one, issued from the recognition that without it, the c
WHO Chief Calls Gaza Health System Destruction 'Tragedy,' Urges Ceasefire
Gaza's health crisis has resulted in 582 deaths and 748 injuries from 246 documented attacks on healthcare facilities; hospitals overwhelmed with wounded patients and displaced populations facing acute shortages of food, water, and medicine.
A microcosm of the nightmare playing out across Gaza
Mark
When Tedros says the health system is destroyed, is he speaking from direct observation or from reports?
Mimi
He's speaking from both. WHO staff visited Al-Shifa and another northern hospital just days before he made the statement. They saw the conditions themselves—the abandoned patients, the shortages. But he's also synthesizing reports from across the territory.
Luke
The 246 attacks figure—is that verified by independent observers, or is that WHO's own count based on reports they've received?
Mimi
It's WHO's registered count as of December 20th. That's their documentation, not a third-party audit. The actual number could be higher if some attacks went unreported.
Mark
And the claim that only nine hospitals are partially functional—how do they define "partially functional"?
Mimi
The source doesn't specify the exact threshold. It likely means the hospital is still operating in some capacity, but not at normal levels. Al-Shifa, for instance, can only do basic first aid now.
Luke
So when he says 38 percent of beds are available, that's 38 percent of pre-war capacity, not 38 percent of the nine functioning hospitals?
Mimi
Correct. It's a territory-wide figure. The nine hospitals that are partially open are themselves overwhelmed and understaffed.
Mark
The 50,000 displaced people sheltering in Al-Shifa—are they patients, or are they just using the hospital as shelter?
Mimi
The source says the hospital is "providing refuge" to them. So they're using it as shelter, not necessarily as patients. Though in a place with acute hunger and no water, the line between shelter and medical need blurs quickly.
Luke
Has the WHO documented whether these attacks on hospitals were deliberate strikes or collateral damage from nearby strikes?
Mimi
The source doesn't distinguish between those categories. It just registers that 246 attacks occurred and resulted in those deaths and injuries.
Mark
And the Israeli military's claim about Hamas tunnels—has the WHO investigated that?
Mimi
The source doesn't indicate that the WHO has independently verified the claim. They note that Israel makes the accusation and Hamas denies it, but they don't take a position on whether the claim is true.
Luke
So the ceasefire call—is that new, or has the WHO been saying this since October?
Mimi
They've been calling for it since the war began. This statement on December 24th is a reiteration, not a new position. But the language—"decimation," "tragedy," "nightmare"—suggests the situation has deteriorated enough that Tedros felt compelled to speak more forcefully.
El Pulso
- Of Gaza's 36 pre-war hospitals, only 9 remain even partially functional — leaving a population under bombardment with 38% of its beds and 30% of its medical staff still standing.
- Al-Shifa, once Gaza's premier medical center, has been reduced to offering basic first aid while simultaneously sheltering 50,000 displaced people with acute shortages of food, water, medicine, and fuel.
- WHO staff visiting Al-Shifa on December 23rd documented scenes Tedros called 'unbearable' — children and patients abandoned in wards, begging for water inside a building that can no longer guarantee survival, let alone treatment.
- 246 documented attacks on healthcare facilities have killed 582 people and wounded 748 others, dismantling the legal and moral protections that international humanitarian law was designed to enforce.
- A delivery of 19,200 liters of generator fuel offered temporary relief, but WHO warned it was a fraction of what is needed — and without a ceasefire, every stabilization effort risks being overtaken by the next wave of casualties.
On Christmas Eve, the head of the World Health Organisation named what was unfolding in Gaza's hospitals with quiet precision: a tragedy. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, speaking from an institution that has witnessed the fragility of healing systems across generations, described not a crisis in progress but a destruction already accomplished — of the infrastructure, the workforce, and the sanctuaries that human civilization has long agreed must be spared from war. His call for an immediate ceasefire was less a political demand than a medical one, issued from the recognition that without it, the capacity to heal would cease to exist entirely.
On December 24th, WHO Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus described Gaza's medical situation in a single word: a tragedy. Speaking from the vantage point of an agency that has watched health systems fail before, he was precise in his language — this was not a setback but a fundamental destruction of the capacity to heal. His statement, posted to social media alongside a renewed call for an immediate ceasefire, carried the weight of documentation behind it.
The numbers were unsparing. Of 36 hospitals that existed before the conflict, only nine remained partially operational by late December, all in the south. Just 38 percent of hospital beds were still available, and only 30 percent of the original medical workforce remained on duty. These figures translated directly into human consequence: fewer hands to treat the wounded, fewer beds to receive them, fewer resources to sustain either.
Al-Shifa, once Gaza's largest and most capable hospital, had become the symbol of this collapse. Reduced to offering only basic first aid, it was simultaneously sheltering approximately 50,000 displaced people. When WHO staff visited on December 23rd alongside other UN and humanitarian representatives, they found what Tedros called 'unbearable' scenes — patients including young children, some abandoned, begging for food and water in a facility that could no longer meet even their most basic needs. He described Al-Shifa as 'a microcosm of the nightmare playing out across Gaza.'
The shortages were cascading and comprehensive: medicines, fuel, food, water, and safety itself. A delivery of 19,200 liters of generator fuel offered brief relief, but the WHO was clear that far more would be needed. Meanwhile, 246 documented attacks on healthcare infrastructure had killed 582 people and injured 748 others — strikes on the very institutions that international humanitarian law designates as protected.
Yet amid the accounting of destruction, Tedros paused to acknowledge those who remained: the doctors, nurses, and ambulance drivers still showing up, still attempting to heal in the ruins of their profession. His call for a ceasefire was inseparable from that recognition — without one, the wounded would keep arriving, the shortages would deepen, and the people choosing to stay would eventually have nothing left to work with.
On Sunday, December 24th, the director of the World Health Organisation described what was happening in Gaza's hospitals in a single, unadorned phrase: a tragedy. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, speaking from the vantage point of an agency that has watched health systems collapse before, said the decimation of Gaza's medical infrastructure was precisely that—not a complication, not a setback, but a fundamental destruction of the capacity to heal. He posted the statement on social media alongside a call for an immediate ceasefire, a plea the WHO had been repeating since the war began in October.
The numbers behind his words were stark. Of the 36 hospitals that existed in Gaza before the conflict, only nine remained even partially operational by late December, all of them in the southern part of the territory. Across the entire Palestinian enclave, only 38 percent of the hospital beds that had existed before the war were still available for patients. The medical workforce had been hollowed out: only 30 percent of the original health staff remained at work. These were not abstract statistics. They meant that when wounded people arrived at hospitals, there were fewer beds to receive them, fewer doctors to treat them, and fewer nurses to care for them.
Al-Shifa, which had been Gaza's largest hospital before the fighting began, became the symbol of this collapse. The facility, once capable of handling complex cases and serving as a regional medical center, had been reduced to providing only the most basic first aid. The hospital was also sheltering approximately 50,000 people who had been displaced from their homes by the violence. On December 23rd, WHO staff visited Al-Shifa alongside representatives from other UN agencies and humanitarian organizations. What they documented was what Tedros called "unbearable" scenes: patients, including young children, abandoned or nearly so, begging for food and water in a hospital that could no longer meet their medical needs, let alone their basic survival needs.
The shortages were comprehensive and cascading. Medicines were scarce. Power was intermittent—a delivery of 19,200 liters of generator fuel on Saturday provided temporary relief, but the WHO made clear that far more would be needed to sustain vital services. Food and water were in acute shortage. Safety itself was absent; the constant threat of violence meant that even the act of seeking medical care carried mortal risk. Tedros described Al-Shifa as "a microcosm of the nightmare playing out across Gaza," a phrase that captured how the hospital's condition reflected the broader catastrophe unfolding across the territory.
The violence targeting health facilities had been documented with precision. As of December 20th, the WHO had registered 246 separate attacks on healthcare infrastructure in Gaza—hospitals, clinics, ambulances. These attacks had killed 582 people and injured 748 others. The Israeli military maintained that Hamas maintained tunnels beneath hospitals and used medical facilities as command centers, allegations that Hamas denied. Regardless of the claims and counterclaims, the result was the same: hospitals that international humanitarian law was supposed to protect had been repeatedly struck, their capacity degraded, their staff traumatized or killed.
Yet Tedros also took time to acknowledge the medical workers who remained. Doctors, nurses, ambulance drivers—they continued showing up, continued attempting to save lives, continued working in conditions of constant insecurity and overwhelming patient volume. The WHO chief seemed to recognize that the story of Gaza's health system was not only one of destruction but also of people choosing to work in the ruins of their profession, choosing to try to heal even when the systems meant to support them had been dismantled. His call for a ceasefire was not separate from this recognition; it was inseparable from it. Without a ceasefire, the wounded would keep arriving, the shortages would deepen, and the medical workers would keep working in an impossible situation until they could not anymore.
Citas Notables
The decimation of the Gaza health system is a tragedy.— Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General
Al-Shifa is a microcosm of the nightmare playing out across Gaza, where drastic shortages of medicines, food, power, water and safety imperil the population.— Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, WHO Director-General
Quieres la nota completa?
Lee el original en News18 ↗
War & Conflict