VW's 630,000-strong workforce becomes existential liability as Chinese EV makers circle

Up to 100,000 job cuts planned across Volkswagen's global workforce, with tens of thousands of positions eliminated in Germany, affecting workers at VW and luxury brands Porsche and Audi.
A workforce once a sign of might became a massive burden
VW's 630,000 employees — far more than competitors — now threaten the company's survival against agile Chinese rivals.
Mark

Why did VW let its workforce get so large in the first place? That seems like a strategic choice someone should have questioned earlier.

Mimi

It was a choice, yes — but one that made sense for decades. VW controlled more of its own production than competitors did. They made components internally, wrote their own software. That required more workers, but it also gave them control. And when you're profitable, when you're Germany's industrial flagship, there's no pressure to change.

Luke

But the source doesn't actually explain why that vertical integration was better or worse than the Toyota model. We know Toyota does it with half the workers, but we don't know if VW's approach had advantages that justified the cost at the time.

Mimi

Fair point. The acquisitions are clearer — Skoda, Porsche, SEAT, Bugatti. Each one added brands and complexity. That strategy worked for a while, but it made the company harder to operate.

Mark

And the unions and Lower Saxony — they actively blocked workforce reductions?

Mimi

Lower Saxony holds 20 percent of voting rights and can veto major decisions. They've pressured executives repeatedly not to close plants or cut jobs. The unions negotiated high wages and benefits. Neither had incentive to push for leaner operations.

Luke

But the source doesn't say Lower Saxony explicitly blocked cuts. It says they "pressured" executives and "previously" blocked closures during crises. We don't know if they would have blocked cuts in normal times.

Mimi

True. But the pattern is clear — there was structural resistance to the kind of painful restructuring that might have happened earlier.

Mark

So when did the model actually break?

Mimi

When Chinese EV makers gained ground and VW was slow to transition. China is a third of their sales. They lost market share there and in Europe. It's the same mistake American automakers made with Japanese competitors in the 1960s and 70s.

Luke

The source says VW was "slow" to transition to EVs, but it doesn't give dates or specific milestones. We know Chinese makers gained traction, but we don't know exactly when VW fell behind or by how much.

Mark

And now they're cutting 50,000 jobs and hoping to save €4 billion a year. Is that enough?

Mimi

Analysts say probably not. The underlying cost structure is still high. They need more automation, more radical reforms. Some predict Chinese companies might eventually buy VW or dominate European markets entirely.

Luke

Those are predictions, though. Schularick's prediction that BYD will buy VW — that's one economist's view, not a forecast backed by market data. We should hold that lightly.

Mark

What's the government doing?

Mimi

Germany is subsidizing EV battery plants. The EU is imposing tariffs on Chinese EVs — up to 45 percent — and advancing the Industrial Accelerator Act. But the US charges 100 percent tariffs and has largely shut Chinese competitors out. Europe's response is weaker.

Luke

The tariff comparison is useful, but we don't know if higher tariffs would actually help VW or just protect inefficiency. That's a policy question the source doesn't answer.

  • VW's workforce, swollen by decades of acquisitions and vertical integration, now costs the company roughly double what competitors pay per factory worker — a structural disadvantage that profitable years once masked but a softening market has made impossible to ignore.
  • Chinese EV makers, led by BYD, have gained serious technological ground while VW moved cautiously into electrification, costing the automaker critical momentum in China, which accounts for a third of its global sales.
  • The planned elimination of up to 100,000 jobs — touching the core VW brand, Porsche, and Audi — represents the most dramatic restructuring in the company's history, yet analysts warn the targeted €4 billion in annual savings may fall short of what genuine competitiveness requires.
  • Germany's powerful unions and the state of Lower Saxony, which holds veto power over major decisions, have long shielded workers from leaner operations — a political and social dynamic that now collides directly with the urgency of survival.
  • Some analysts now openly predict that VW's European plants could eventually be shared with Chinese producers, and that the automaker itself may one day be acquired by a company like BYD — a scenario that would have seemed unthinkable a decade ago.

One of the world's most storied automakers now confronts the weight of its own history — decades of vertical integration, union-protected wages, and delayed adaptation have left Volkswagen carrying a workforce nearly twice the size of its leanest rivals. In early September, the company's supervisory board endorsed a plan to eliminate up to 100,000 jobs and shutter four German factories, a reckoning shaped by the rapid rise of Chinese electric vehicle makers and the slow erosion of VW's dominance in China, its largest market. The story echoes an older one: the American auto industry's failure to heed the arrival of Japanese competitors until it was nearly too late. Whether Volkswagen can reform itself from within — or whether it will be reshaped by forces beyond its borders — is now the defining question of European industrial life.

Volkswagen's restructuring plan — endorsed by its supervisory board in early September — calls for eliminating up to 100,000 jobs and closing four German factories. The cuts will reach every corner of the business, from the core VW brand to luxury divisions Porsche and Audi. Mercedes-Benz and suppliers like Bosch are making similar moves, signaling that the pressure is industry-wide.

The roots of VW's crisis run deep. The company built its model around controlling more stages of manufacturing internally than almost any competitor — a choice that required more workers, and more expensive ones. German factory labor costs roughly double what competitors pay elsewhere. Decades of acquisitions — Skoda, SEAT, Bugatti, and several truck makers — added revenue but also layered in complexity that made the organization increasingly difficult to run. For years, strong profits and the political influence of Germany's unions, backed by the state of Lower Saxony's 20 percent voting stake, kept pressure for reform at bay.

Then the market shifted. Chinese EV makers advanced rapidly while VW moved slowly, losing ground in China — its largest market, representing roughly a third of global sales. The parallel to the American auto industry's failure to respond to Japanese competition in the 1960s and 1970s is hard to miss. Toyota, producing a comparable volume of vehicles, operates with nearly half VW's workforce through greater supplier reliance, automation, and simpler management.

VW hopes to save €4 billion annually through the cuts, and is accelerating investments in robotics and planning a sub-€20,000 electric vehicle for next year. But analysts argue the underlying cost structure and slow decision-making culture demand more radical change. Some predict production will increasingly shift to Asia, and that Chinese manufacturers could eventually share — or acquire — VW's European operations.

The European Union has imposed tariffs of up to 45 percent on Chinese-made EVs and is advancing industrial policy to protect strategic sectors, though economists like Niall Ferguson warn Europe has been too slow to respond. Moritz Schularick of the Kiel Institute suggested using market access as leverage — and predicted VW would likely end up in Chinese hands. Whether the restructuring plan is bold enough to prevent that outcome remains genuinely uncertain.

Volkswagen's 630,000-person workforce — nearly 680,000 when Chinese joint ventures are included — has become the company's most pressing liability. The German automaker now plans to eliminate up to 100,000 jobs and close four domestic factories, a restructuring the company's supervisory board endorsed in early September. The cuts will touch every corner of the business, from the core VW brand to the luxury divisions Porsche and Audi. Other German automakers face similar pressures: Mercedes-Benz is cutting thousands of positions, and suppliers like Bosch are announcing major cost reductions.

VW's headcount problem did not emerge overnight. The company chose a production model fundamentally different from its global competitors — one that required controlling more stages of manufacturing internally, from components to software. That vertical integration demanded more workers and, critically, more expensive workers. Factory labor in Germany runs roughly double the cost of competitors' operations elsewhere. Over decades, VW also pursued an aggressive acquisition strategy, absorbing Skoda, Porsche, SEAT, Bugatti, and several truck makers. Each acquisition added complexity: different supply chains, different designs, different management layers. The strategy generated revenue, but it also created an organization that became increasingly difficult to operate.

For years, this bloated structure was sustainable because VW was profitable and Germany's powerful unions — backed by the state of Lower Saxony, which holds 20 percent of voting rights — successfully resisted workforce reductions. Lower Saxony, home to VW's Wolfsburg headquarters, has veto power over major decisions and has repeatedly pressured executives to preserve jobs and plants. The unions, meanwhile, negotiated wage increases and benefits that made VW workers among the world's best-paid autoworkers. Neither force had incentive to push for leaner operations.

Then the market shifted. Chinese EV makers gained serious technological ground while VW moved slowly into electric vehicles. That delay cost the company dearly in China, which accounts for roughly a third of VW's sales. Demand softened in Europe and other key markets. The company was repeating a mistake the American auto industry made in the 1960s and 1970s, when Ford, General Motors, and Chrysler were slow to adapt as Japanese and European competitors ate into their market share. By the time US automakers shifted to leaner production, a decade had passed and they had fallen significantly behind. Toyota, which produces a similar volume of vehicles as VW, operates with nearly half the workforce by relying more on suppliers, higher automation, and simpler management structures.

VW has already trimmed thousands of positions as profits came under pressure. The new plan targets an additional 50,000 job cuts worldwide, with tens of thousands in Germany. The company hopes to save roughly €4 billion annually through these reductions. But analysts warn the cuts may not be sufficient. The underlying cost structure remains high, and VW's decision-making culture remains slow. Meghan Ostertag, an analyst at the US-based Information Technology and Innovation Foundation, argues VW needs to invest far more heavily in automation to compete with leaner firms like China's BYD, one of Europe's fastest-growing EV brands. VW has lagged peers in plant automation but has recently stepped up investments in robotics and digital upgrades for EV production. The company is also planning its first sub-€20,000 electric vehicle for next year.

With China responsible for roughly 30 percent of VW's global vehicle output, analysts predict more production will shift to Asia. Some suggest VW might eventually share its European plants with Chinese EV producers — a scenario once considered unthinkable. Daniel Harrison, senior automotive analyst at London-based Ultima Media, notes that the complexities of integrating VW's many brands and supply chains have made the company very difficult to operate, and that deeper, more radical reforms may be necessary.

The German government is providing subsidies and loans for domestic EV battery plants to reduce reliance on Chinese imports. The European Union is advancing the Industrial Accelerator Act to boost competitiveness and shield strategic industries from unfair Chinese competition. The EU has imposed tariffs of up to 45 percent on Chinese-made EVs — far below the 100 percent levies the US charges, which have largely shut Chinese competitors out of the American market. Historian Niall Ferguson from Harvard warned that Europe has been slow to respond to China's strategy of massive subsidies to EV makers. "Unless there's radical change, I predict: Europeans will be driving Chinese cars on a massive scale very soon," Ferguson said. Economist Moritz Schularick, president of the Kiel Institute for the World Economy, suggested using market access as leverage — allowing Chinese brands to sell in Europe only if they produce locally. When asked about VW's long-term future, Schularick predicted the German automaker would "likely be bought by a Chinese car maker like BYD." Whether VW's restructuring plan proves sufficient remains an open question.

The company makes many of its components and software internally, increasing the demand for labor and labor costs. Factory expenses in Germany can be up to twice those of the competition.
— Meghan Ostertag, Information Technology and Innovation Foundation
Unless there's radical change, Europeans will be driving Chinese cars on a massive scale very soon.
— Niall Ferguson, Harvard University
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte? Das Original lesen bei Deutsche Welle ↗
Kontakt FAQ