Seven months after Washington engineered the removal of Nicolás Maduro, Venezuela's oil fields and their revenues have become entwined with American economic interests in ways that raise ancient questions about the difference between liberation and dependency. More than half a million barrels of Venezuelan crude flow daily into Gulf Coast refineries — a fourfold increase from late 2025 — while the United States holds the proceeds in accounts that remain largely unaccounted for to the Venezuelan people or their elected representatives. History reminds us that the line between partnership and pr
US refineries absorb half of Venezuela's oil output under new arrangement
Without accountability mechanisms, the US risks entrenching a corrupt successor regime.
So the US removed Maduro and now controls half of Venezuela's oil exports. That's a lot of leverage. What does that actually mean for ordinary Venezuelans?
It means the government in Caracas can't spend money without Washington's permission. Every dollar from oil sales goes into an account the US controls. The interim government has to ask for money and explain what it wants to do with it. On paper, that's supposed to prevent corruption. In practice, it means Venezuela has no financial independence.
And the money—where is it actually going?
That's the problem. The US collected $13 billion this year but has only disclosed about $3 billion in disbursements. Nobody knows what happened to the rest. The administration won't say.
Why would they keep it secret?
That's the question everyone's asking. It could be leverage for future negotiations. It could be sitting in reserve. It could be going to things the administration doesn't want to defend publicly. The lack of transparency is the story.
What about the opposition? Maduro's gone, but are things actually more democratic?
No. The opposition was excluded from the Houston meetings entirely. The new government is run by Maduro's former vice president. So you've removed one leader but kept the same power structure, just with American money controlling it.
And if this continues?
You entrench a successor regime that's dependent on US approval. Elections become less likely, not more. The opposition has nowhere to go. Venezuela becomes a client state with oil reserves.
El Pulso
- US refineries now absorb over 500,000 barrels of Venezuelan crude daily — a fourfold surge from 135,000 bpd just months ago — making Washington the de facto anchor of Venezuela's entire export economy.
- The arrangement is mutual on paper but asymmetric in practice: the US sends naphtha to keep Venezuelan pipelines flowing while collecting over $13 billion in oil revenues, with Venezuela required to submit monthly budget requests for its own money.
- The administration has disclosed almost nothing about how that $13 billion has been allocated, with only roughly $3 billion reportedly authorized for Venezuelan use — leaving a vast financial black box at the center of a sovereign nation's economy.
- Venezuela's interim government, led by Maduro's own former vice president, speaks optimistically of reaching 1.245 million barrels per day by August, but the technocratic optimism papers over a country whose political future is being decided without its opposition.
- The Council on Foreign Relations and Nobel laureate María Corina Machado's movement warn that without democratic safeguards or a credible path to elections, the US risks trading one authoritarian arrangement for another — this one denominated in oil revenues and American approval.
Seven months after Washington engineered the removal of Nicolás Maduro, Venezuela's oil fields and their revenues have become entwined with American economic interests in ways that raise ancient questions about the difference between liberation and dependency. More than half a million barrels of Venezuelan crude flow daily into Gulf Coast refineries — a fourfold increase from late 2025 — while the United States holds the proceeds in accounts that remain largely unaccounted for to the Venezuelan people or their elected representatives. History reminds us that the line between partnership and protectorate is often drawn not by treaties, but by who controls the money.
Seven months after Washington removed Nicolás Maduro and installed an interim government in Caracas, American refineries have become Venezuela's dominant customer. Under Secretary of Energy Kyle Haustveit disclosed at a Houston industry conference this week that more than 500,000 barrels of Venezuelan crude now arrive daily at Gulf Coast plants — up from 135,000 barrels per day at the close of 2025. With Venezuela producing roughly 1.25 million barrels per day in total, the United States is absorbing nearly half the country's output.
The logic is geological as much as political. Venezuelan crude is heavy and acidic, suited to the specialized Gulf Coast refineries built precisely for such grades. To keep it flowing through pipelines, the US ships back more than 100,000 barrels daily of naphtha as a diluent — an exchange Haustveit called 'a beautiful energy partnership.' What that phrase softens is the underlying architecture of control: Washington manages Venezuela's most valuable export and the revenues it generates.
Those revenues are substantial and largely invisible. The Financial Times reported that the US collected over $13 billion from Venezuelan oil sales in 2026 alone. Secretary of State Marco Rubio told Congress that proceeds would be held in an American-overseen account, with Venezuela submitting monthly budget requests for pre-approved expenditures. Yet only around $3 billion has reportedly been authorized for Venezuelan use, and the administration has offered almost no public accounting of the rest.
At the Houston conference, PDVSA vice president Jovanny Martinez spoke of output targets, rising domestic fuel production, and energy reform — a forward-looking register that sidestepped harder questions about sovereignty. Those questions were posed more directly by the Council on Foreign Relations in June, which noted that the administration has also excluded Venezuela's democratic opposition — including Nobel peace laureate María Corina Machado — from any discussions about the country's political future. The interim government is led by Maduro's former vice president, and without a credible path to elections, analysts warn the US may be entrenching a new dependency rather than restoring a democracy.
Seven months after the United States removed President Nicolas Maduro from power and installed an interim government in Caracas, American refineries have become Venezuela's primary customer. More than half a million barrels of Venezuelan crude now flow daily into Gulf Coast processing plants—a dramatic reversal from the 135,000 barrels per day that arrived at the end of 2025. The figure comes from Kyle Haustveit, the Under Secretary of Energy, who disclosed it at an industry conference in Houston this week. Venezuela's total output has climbed to roughly 1.25 million barrels per day, meaning the United States is absorbing approximately 40 percent of the nation's oil production.
The arrangement works because of geography and geology. Venezuelan crude is heavy and acidic—the kind of oil that requires specialized refineries to process. The Gulf Coast plants that receive it were built precisely for this grade of petroleum. The United States has sweetened the deal by sending more than 100,000 barrels daily of naphtha, a lighter hydrocarbon that Venezuelan producers blend with their heavier crude to make it flow more easily through pipelines and refineries. Haustveit called it "a beautiful energy partnership," language that glosses over the fundamental reality: Washington now controls Venezuela's most valuable export and, by extension, the revenue it generates.
That control is substantial and opaque. According to the Financial Times, the United States collected more than $13 billion from Venezuelan oil sales in 2026 alone. President Trump disputed the figure upward but offered no alternative number. Secretary of State Marco Rubio told Congress that oil revenues would be deposited into an account under American oversight, with Venezuela required to submit monthly budget requests and Washington pre-approving what the money could be spent on. Yet the administration has disclosed almost nothing about how much of that $13 billion has actually been disbursed or what it has funded. A State Department official mentioned in April that roughly $3 billion had been authorized for Venezuelan use, but the gap between collected revenue and disclosed spending remains a black box.
Venezuelan officials at the Houston event spoke optimistically about the future. Jovanny Martinez, a vice president at the state oil company PDVSA, said output would reach 1.245 million barrels per day by the end of August, with exports up nearly 20 percent for the year. He emphasized that fuel production has risen 12.9 percent domestically, supplying more power to Venezuelan households. The language was technocratic and forward-looking—talk of energy reform and development. But it masked a deeper question about sovereignty and accountability.
The Council on Foreign Relations raised that question directly in June. The think tank noted that while the Trump administration repeatedly frames its control of Venezuelan oil as mutually beneficial, it has not publicly disclosed how much crude it has sold, how much money it has collected, or where that money has gone. The opacity extends to Venezuelan gold and other mineral exports that Washington also controls. More troubling, the administration has excluded Venezuela's opposition—including Nobel peace laureate Maria Corina Machado—from any discussions about the country's political future. The interim government is led by Decly Rodriguez, Maduro's former vice president. Without democratic safeguards or a clear path back to elections, the think tank warned, the United States risks simply replacing one authoritarian regime with another, this time one dependent on American oil revenues and American approval. Venezuela's opposition had proposed a roadmap calling for presidential elections and political negotiations, but those voices remain outside the room where decisions about the country's future are being made.
Citas Notables
A beautiful energy partnership with real value being created on both sides of the trade.— Kyle Haustveit, Under Secretary of Energy
Without accountability mechanisms or a clear democratic roadmap, the United States risks entrenching a corrupt successor regime.— Council on Foreign Relations