US Raises 'Dangerous and Unlawful' South China Sea Concerns in Beijing Talks

Candor is not the same as agreement.
Despite substantive talks in Beijing, the U.S. and China remain far apart on maritime disputes and arms control.
Mark

So what exactly happened at Second Thomas Shoal that made the U.S. so upset?

Mimi

The Philippines was trying to resupply troops stationed there on October 22, and China blocked the mission. It's a small atoll, but it's strategically important and contested. The U.S. saw it as an aggressive move.

Luke

Do we know the details of how China blocked it? Was it ships, aircraft, what?

Mimi

The statement doesn't specify the method. It just says China obstructed the mission.

Luke

That's worth noting—we know it happened, but the mechanism isn't clear from what was released.

Mark

And then four days later there was this aircraft incident?

Mimi

Yes. The U.S. called it an unsafe interception of an American aircraft on October 24. Again, the details are sparse.

Luke

"Unsafe" is doing a lot of work there. It could mean anything from a close pass to something genuinely dangerous. We don't have the specifics.

Mark

Why does the U.S. think these talks will change anything?

Mimi

They're trying to establish communication channels so that when tensions spike, there's a way to talk instead of escalate. It's risk management, not conflict resolution.

Luke

And China has to agree to that framework. We don't know if Beijing sees these incidents the same way Washington does, or if they think they were justified.

Mark

What about the arms control piece?

Mimi

That's the deeper concern—China's nuclear buildup. The U.S. wants to negotiate limits, but China hasn't been interested in those talks.

Luke

And we should be clear: China hasn't confirmed the Biden-Xi meeting yet, so even this diplomatic momentum is fragile.

  • China's obstruction of a Philippine resupply mission and its unsafe interception of a U.S. aircraft gave Washington concrete grievances it was unwilling to leave unnamed at the table.
  • The February spy balloon incident had already fractured bilateral trust, and the relationship has been in a fragile, deliberate reconstruction ever since.
  • Both governments are maneuvering toward a Biden-Xi summit at the APEC gathering in San Francisco, but China has yet to officially confirm it will happen — leaving the diplomatic scaffolding visibly incomplete.
  • A separate track of arms control talks is being scheduled, driven by American alarm over China's nuclear buildup, though Beijing has shown little willingness to engage those conversations seriously.
  • The overall picture is of two powers not seeking harmony, but seeking just enough structure to prevent their competition from becoming catastrophic.

In Beijing, American and Chinese diplomats met to address the frictions accumulating in the South China Sea — a body of water that has become the most consequential arena of their rivalry. The United States named specific incidents, specific dates, and called Chinese conduct dangerous and unlawful, while both sides acknowledged the deeper purpose: keeping communication alive before two leaders meet, so that a miscalculation does not become something worse. It is the ancient work of great powers learning, slowly and imperfectly, how to share a world they both wish to shape.

On a Friday in Beijing, American and Chinese officials sat down over the waters that have become the sharpest edge of their rivalry. Mark Lambert of the State Department met with Hong Liang, China's Director-General for Boundary and Ocean Affairs, for talks both sides would call substantive and candid — a phrase that in diplomacy often signals more friction than comfort.

The U.S. came with specific complaints. Washington raised China's October 22 obstruction of a Philippine resupply mission to Second Thomas Shoal, and an unsafe interception of a U.S. aircraft four days later. The State Department's language was unusually direct — characterizing Chinese conduct as dangerous and unlawful, not the softened vocabulary of routine diplomacy.

The meeting sits within a larger effort to stabilize a relationship badly damaged since February, when the U.S. shot down a suspected Chinese spy balloon over American airspace. Since then, both sides have been working to restore basic lines of communication. The immediate prize is a meeting between President Biden and President Xi on the sidelines of the APEC summit in San Francisco in mid-November — though China has not yet confirmed it will attend.

Running alongside the maritime talks is a separate diplomatic track on arms control. U.S. Assistant Secretary Mallory Stewart is set to host China's Sun Xiaobo the following week, as Washington presses Beijing to engage on nuclear risk reduction — a conversation China has largely avoided. American officials frame it less as negotiation than as a repeated request for China to simply participate.

What these parallel efforts reveal is a relationship too consequential to abandon and too contested to resolve. The U.S. is not asking China to surrender its ambitions — only to pursue them with enough restraint and communication that a single miscalculation does not spiral beyond anyone's control. Whether Beijing is prepared to offer even that remains, for now, an open question.

In Beijing on Friday, American and Chinese officials sat down to discuss the waters that have become the most volatile flashpoint in their relationship. Mark Lambert, the State Department's China Coordinator, met with Hong Liang, China's Director-General for Boundary and Ocean Affairs, for what both sides would later describe as substantive and candid talks. The conversation centered on maritime disputes—particularly the South China Sea, where competing claims and military posturing have created a landscape of constant friction.

The United States came to the table with specific grievances. American officials directly raised two recent incidents that had rattled Washington: China's obstruction of a Philippine resupply mission to Second Thomas Shoal on October 22, and what the State Department characterized as an unsafe interception of a U.S. aircraft four days later. These were not abstract concerns about regional stability. They were concrete actions, named and dated, that the U.S. side wanted Beijing to understand it viewed as dangerous and unlawful. The State Department's language was notably sharp—not the usual diplomatic softening, but a direct characterization of Chinese conduct as crossing lines.

The timing of these talks matters. They arrive in the shadow of a larger diplomatic effort to stabilize a relationship that has been deteriorating for months. The February downing of a suspected Chinese spy balloon over U.S. airspace had sent bilateral relations into a tailspin, and the two countries have been working since then to rebuild basic channels of communication. This Friday meeting in Beijing is part of that effort—an attempt to keep lines open and, as the State Department put it, to avoid miscommunication and miscalculation. Both sides have reason to want this. The U.S. is pushing hard for a meeting between President Joe Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping on the sidelines of the APEC summit scheduled for mid-November in San Francisco, though China has not yet officially confirmed it will happen.

Beyond the South China Sea, the talks touched on the East China Sea as well, another body of water where Chinese actions and the interests of neighboring nations collide. But the maritime disputes are only part of what Washington wants to address. The State Department has also scheduled separate negotiations on arms control, with the U.S. Assistant Secretary for Arms Control Mallory Stewart set to host Sun Xiaobo, head of China's Foreign Ministry arms-control department, at the State Department the following week. This reflects a deeper American anxiety: China's nuclear weapons buildup. The U.S. has been calling on Beijing to engage substantively on arms control and strategic risk reduction, but China has shown little appetite for those conversations. The frustration is evident in how American officials frame it—not as a negotiation between equals, but as a repeated plea for Beijing to simply show up and talk.

What emerges from these parallel tracks of diplomacy is a picture of two powers trying to manage a relationship that has become genuinely difficult to manage. The U.S. is not asking China to change its fundamental interests or ambitions. It is asking for restraint in how those interests are pursued, for communication when tensions spike, and for willingness to discuss the weapons that could make any miscalculation catastrophic. Whether Beijing is willing to meet those requests remains unclear. China has not yet confirmed the Biden-Xi meeting, and a senior Biden administration official acknowledged this week that important details have yet to be worked out. The talks in Beijing on Friday may have been candid, but candor is not the same as agreement.

The United States underscored concerns with the PRC's dangerous and unlawful actions in the South China Sea.
— U.S. State Department statement
We have continually called on the PRC to substantively engage on arms control issues and reducing strategic risk.
— State Department spokesperson
Envie de l'histoire complète ? Lire l'original sur Devdiscourse ↗
Nous contacter FAQ