Beneath the surface of diplomatic negotiation, the United States is reaching toward one of the most consequential resource arrangements in modern history — a potential century-long claim on Venezuelan oilfields holding nearly a third of the nation's vast reserves. Brokered with a government assembled from the remnants of the Maduro era and operating under contested legal authority, the deal raises ancient questions about sovereignty, legitimacy, and who truly owns the wealth beneath a people's feet. The Trump administration frames this as strategic necessity under its 'Donroe Doctrine,' but cr
US pursues major stake in Venezuela's oil reserves amid opposition outcry
It sounds colonial, because it is.
So the US is trying to own pieces of Venezuelan oil fields directly? That's not just buying oil on the market—that's ownership.
Right. They're negotiating for direct stakes in more than a dozen fields, potentially through a 100-year lease. It's long-term control, not just access.
But who exactly is negotiating on Venezuela's side? Because that matters for whether this is even legitimate.
Delcy Rodríguez, the interim president. She was Maduro's vice-president and petroleum minister before the January raid.
So the person negotiating for Venezuela is someone from the regime the US just removed. That's the opposition's whole complaint—this isn't a new government, it's the old one.
And the opposition leader, Machado, she can't even come back from exile?
She's been sidelined. She's believed to have won the 2024 elections, but she's stuck outside the country.
So we have an interim government that the US installed, negotiating away oil reserves to the US, while the person who probably actually won the election is exiled. That's the constitutional violation they're talking about.
Is there any historical precedent for this kind of arrangement?
Yes—the Anglo-Persian Oil Company in Iran in 1901. They got a concession that gave them sweeping control over oil resources.
But that was a century ago. Does that comparison actually hold, or is it just rhetoric?
The structure is similar—foreign company or government gets long-term control of resources in exchange for payments to the local government. The profits flow out.
And Trump's reasoning? Why does he want this?
Partly energy security, partly to exclude China and Russia from Venezuelan oil. It's part of his broader Latin America strategy.
But we don't actually know the full terms of what's being negotiated. These are reports from unnamed sources. We know talks are happening, but not the details.
Fair point. So what happens next?
That depends on whether the Venezuelan opposition can block it, and whether the interim government actually signs something.
Le Pouls
- US officials are in advanced talks to secure direct ownership stakes in over a dozen Venezuelan oilfields, with a potential 100-year lease on reserves that dwarf those of Saudi Arabia in scale and consequence.
- The deal is being negotiated with a government led by Maduro-era holdovers — including a minister carrying a $25 million US bounty — while the opposition leader whose movement won the 2024 election remains stranded in exile.
- Venezuelan opposition figures and economists are sounding alarms, calling the arrangement unconstitutional, predatory, and structurally indistinguishable from the colonial oil concessions that stripped Iran and other nations of resource sovereignty in the early 20th century.
- Energy historians draw a direct line to the 1901 Anglo-Persian concession, warning that Trump's apparent goal is to treat Venezuelan reserves as American reserves — a geopolitical lock-out aimed squarely at China and Russia.
- No presidential election has been scheduled, and when pressed, Trump praised the interim government's performance and suggested Venezuela was 'not yet ready' — leaving the question of democratic self-determination suspended indefinitely.
Beneath the surface of diplomatic negotiation, the United States is reaching toward one of the most consequential resource arrangements in modern history — a potential century-long claim on Venezuelan oilfields holding nearly a third of the nation's vast reserves. Brokered with a government assembled from the remnants of the Maduro era and operating under contested legal authority, the deal raises ancient questions about sovereignty, legitimacy, and who truly owns the wealth beneath a people's feet. The Trump administration frames this as strategic necessity under its 'Donroe Doctrine,' but critics — including exiled economists and opposition leaders — hear in it the familiar grammar of empire, spoken once before over Persian oil fields and Andean copper mines.
The Trump administration is in advanced negotiations to acquire direct ownership stakes in Venezuelan oilfields holding roughly 90 billion barrels of crude — nearly a third of the country's total reserves, which at 303 billion barrels already exceed those of Saudi Arabia and Iran combined. Reports this week indicate the discussions include a potential century-long lease arrangement covering fields in the Orinoco Belt and Lake Maracaibo regions, a scope that even one unnamed Trump official described as massive.
The talks are being conducted with Venezuela's interim government, led by Delcy Rodríguez — a former Maduro vice-president and petroleum minister who assumed authority after Maduro's capture in a January special forces raid orchestrated by the Trump administration. Other negotiating partners include interior minister Diosdado Cabello, who carries a $25 million US bounty for alleged drug trafficking. Meanwhile, María Corina Machado, whose opposition movement is widely believed to have won Venezuela's 2024 presidential election, remains in exile and outside the process entirely.
The reaction from Venezuelan opposition figures and economists has been swift and sharp. One prominent opposition member, speaking anonymously, called it a massive land grab and said it revealed a rapacious, mafia-like America — not the nation of the Marshall Plan. Former minister Ricardo Hausmann argued that an illegitimate government operating under an illegitimate hydrocarbons law has no authority to strike such a deal. Economist Francisco Rodríguez urged Venezuela's national assembly to reject what he called a predatory arrangement imposed under military pressure.
Historians have reached for older precedents. Energy analyst Gregory Brew compared the deal to the 1901 Anglo-Persian Oil Company concession, which handed a British firm sweeping control over Iran's oil in exchange for minimal payments — a structure that retained virtually all profits abroad and operated with near-total authority over the fields. Brew characterized Trump's apparent intent as treating Venezuelan reserves as American reserves, denying access to China, Russia, and others — colonial in nature, he said, because it is.
The negotiations are part of Trump's broader 'Donroe Doctrine,' a 21st-century reframing of the Monroe Doctrine aimed at countering Chinese influence in Latin America through economic and military leverage. Venezuela has become the doctrine's most dramatic expression. Some changes have occurred under Rodríguez — political prisoners have been released and court reforms discussed — but no election has been scheduled. Asked about the delay last month, Trump praised Rodríguez's performance and said Venezuela was not yet ready for a vote. Whether Venezuelans will be permitted to choose their own government remains an open and troubling question.
The Trump administration is in advanced negotiations to claim direct ownership stakes in Venezuelan oilfields containing roughly 90 billion barrels of crude—nearly a third of the country's total reserves. Multiple news outlets reported this week that US officials are discussing terms that could include a century-long lease on several fields located in the Orinoco Belt and Lake Maracaibo regions. Venezuela sits atop the world's largest proven oil reserves, an estimated 303 billion barrels, exceeding Saudi Arabia's 268 billion and Iran's 208 billion. The scale of what is being negotiated has prompted one unnamed Trump official to describe it as massive, a characterization that understates the deal's significance.
The negotiations are taking place with Venezuela's interim government, led by Delcy Rodríguez, who served as vice-president and petroleum minister under Nicolás Maduro before his capture in a January special forces raid. The Trump administration orchestrated Maduro's abduction and has effectively controlled Venezuela's governance since. Rodríguez and other holdovers from Maduro's regime, including interior minister Diosdado Cabello—who carries a $25 million US bounty for alleged drug trafficking—have been collaborating with Trump officials on the oil negotiations. Meanwhile, María Corina Machado, the exiled opposition leader whose movement is widely believed to have won Venezuela's 2024 presidential elections, remains sidelined and unable to return from exile.
The reported deal has ignited fierce criticism from Venezuelan opposition figures and exiled economists who view it as unconstitutional and a betrayal of the country's sovereignty. One prominent opposition member, speaking anonymously due to sensitivities around criticizing the United States, called it a massive land grab and described the move as revealing a rapacious, mafia-like version of America—not the nation of the Marshall Plan. Ricardo Hausmann, an exiled former minister, stated plainly that an illegitimate interim government operating under an illegitimate hydrocarbons law has no authority to strike such a deal. Economist Francisco Rodríguez urged Venezuela's national assembly to reject what he termed a predatory arrangement, arguing that surrendering the country's oil wealth to the US violates the constitution and runs counter to Venezuelan interests, particularly when imposed under military pressure.
Historians and analysts have drawn parallels to colonial-era resource extraction. Gregory Brew, an energy historian at the Eurasia Group, compared the arrangement to the Anglo-Persian Oil Company's 1901 concession in Iran, which granted the British firm sweeping control over oil resources in exchange for payments to the Persian government. That company retained virtually all profits from extracted oil and operated with near-total authority over the fields. Brew noted that Trump's conception of the Venezuelan deal appears designed to treat Venezuelan reserves as American reserves—a source of oil accessible only to the United States and denied to China, Russia, and other potential buyers. He characterized the arrangement as colonial in nature because it is.
The oil negotiations sit within a broader geopolitical strategy Trump has termed the "Donroe Doctrine," a 21st-century adaptation of the 19th-century Monroe Doctrine. Where Monroe sought to exclude European powers from the Americas, Trump's version aims to counter China's expanding influence in Latin America and impose American will through economic and military leverage. Venezuela's transformation into what many observers describe as a US protectorate represents the most dramatic expression of this doctrine to date. Some reforms have occurred under Rodríguez—hundreds of political prisoners have been released and discussions about reforming the regime-controlled supreme court have begun—but no presidential election has been scheduled. When asked about the delay, Trump told reporters last month that Rodríguez was doing a fantastic job and that Venezuela was not yet ready for a vote. The question of whether Venezuelans will ever be permitted to choose their own government remains unanswered.
Citations marquantes
It's a land grab—a massive land grab. This is a rapacious, mafioso United States.— Anonymous Venezuelan opposition figure
An illegitimate interim government with an illegitimate hydrocarbons law has no legitimacy to strike this unconstitutional deal.— Ricardo Hausmann, exiled former minister
It sounds colonial, because it is.— Gregory Brew, energy historian and Eurasia Group analyst