In Beijing this week, American and Chinese military officials met for only the second time since a two-year silence — a fragile resumption born from a November summit between Biden and Xi, and sustained by the belief that dialogue, however imperfect, is safer than its absence. The talks addressed the enduring fault lines of Taiwan, Ukraine, and the South China Sea, where a Philippine coast guard vessel was forced to withdraw from a contested shoal after Chinese ships blocked its resupply for days. No breakthroughs were announced, nor were any expected; the value of the meeting lay in the meeti
US-China military talks resume amid South China Sea tensions
Philippine coast guard personnel faced blocked resupply missions and medical care delays at disputed shoals; no direct casualties reported.
China had won that particular standoff
Mark
So these talks actually happened. What does that mean in practical terms?
Mimi
It means the two militaries are communicating again after two years of complete silence. That's not nothing—it's a floor, a way to avoid accidents escalating into something worse.
Luke
But the source doesn't say what was actually agreed to or decided. These were "routine talks." We don't know if anything changed.
Mimi
Right. The point is the channel exists. The South China Sea incidents keep happening—the ramming, the blockade—but at least now there's a place to talk about them.
Mark
And the Philippines? They're caught in the middle of this.
Mimi
Exactly. Their ship got blocked from resupply by forty Chinese vessels. They had to leave. Now China might occupy the shoal while they're gone.
Luke
The source says China "confirmed the departure." That's China's word. We don't have independent confirmation of what China actually did or plans to do next.
Mark
But the coral piles—the Filipino scientists found evidence China might be building something?
Mimi
That's what the reporting says. Crushed coral in the shallows. It suggests preparation for construction.
Luke
That's a concern, not a fact. We don't know if China is actually building or just preparing. And we don't know if the U.S. talks will have any effect on what happens next.
Mark
So these talks could just be theater while the real action happens at sea?
Mimi
They could be. Or they could be the only thing preventing this from getting much worse. We won't know until the next incident.
Der Puls
- After two years of total military silence, Washington and Beijing have now held their second round of defense talks — a channel so recently frozen that its mere existence is considered progress.
- In the South China Sea, China deployed forty ships to blockade a Philippine coast guard vessel at Sabina Shoal, denying its crew food, fuel, and medical care until the ship was forced to withdraw.
- Beijing immediately claimed the withdrawal as a territorial victory, with its coast guard declaring that Philippine resupply attempts had 'failed' and that China had acted 'in accordance with the law.'
- Filipino scientists have found crushed coral beneath the shoal's waters, raising fears that China is quietly preparing to build a permanent structure — a physical claim that diplomacy may be powerless to reverse.
- With a U.S. presidential election approaching, the continuity of these military talks is uncertain, leaving the question open of whether dialogue will shape events in the region or merely narrate them after the fact.
In Beijing this week, American and Chinese military officials met for only the second time since a two-year silence — a fragile resumption born from a November summit between Biden and Xi, and sustained by the belief that dialogue, however imperfect, is safer than its absence. The talks addressed the enduring fault lines of Taiwan, Ukraine, and the South China Sea, where a Philippine coast guard vessel was forced to withdraw from a contested shoal after Chinese ships blocked its resupply for days. No breakthroughs were announced, nor were any expected; the value of the meeting lay in the meeting itself — two great powers choosing words over the drift toward miscalculation.
Military leaders from Washington and Beijing gathered in the Chinese capital this week for talks that, until recently, had been impossible. The meetings marked only the second round of Defense Policy Coordination Talks since January — a restart that itself felt fragile, coming after two years of complete silence. Michael Chase, the Pentagon's deputy assistant secretary of defense for China, Taiwan and Mongolia, led the American delegation through the familiar pressure points: Taiwan's status, the war in Ukraine, and escalating confrontations in the South China Sea. No one expected these conversations to resolve the fundamental disagreements dividing the two powers. The U.S. pursued them anyway, betting that dialogue — the mere fact of two militaries talking rather than only posturing — could reduce the risk of miscalculation.
The breakdown had been total. As tensions over Taiwan, COVID-19's origins, and trade disputes deepened through 2021, the military-to-military channel simply closed. That freeze lasted until Biden and Xi met in San Francisco and agreed to restore it. January brought the first talks; this week brought the second.
But the South China Sea tells a different story than diplomatic niceties. A Philippine coast guard ship, the BRP Teresa Magbanua, had been stationed at Sabina Shoal — a shallow formation both nations claim. China responded by deploying forty ships to block any resupply attempt, leaving the Philippine crew without food, fuel, or medical attention until the vessel withdrew on Sunday. Beijing's framing was immediate: a coast guard spokesperson declared the departure confirmed that the Philippine presence had 'infringed on China's territorial sovereignty,' and that multiple resupply attempts had 'failed.' The language was calm; the implication unmistakable.
What happens next is unclear. The Philippines said it would send a replacement vessel, but the question hanging over the shoal is whether China will now move to occupy it. Filipino scientists have documented submerged piles of crushed coral — evidence, they fear, that China is preparing to build a permanent structure there. A U.S. defense official said they were 'watching further developments very closely,' a phrase that captures the helplessness of observation when the moves are being made by others. With a presidential election approaching, it remains uncertain whether the next American administration will maintain this fragile channel — or allow it to freeze once more.
Military leaders from Washington and Beijing sat down in the Chinese capital this week for talks that, until recently, had been impossible. The meetings, which concluded on Sunday, marked only the second round of Defense Policy Coordination Talks since January—a restart that itself felt fragile, coming after two years of complete silence between the two militaries.
Michael Chase, the Pentagon's deputy assistant secretary of defense for China, Taiwan and Mongolia, led the American delegation. The discussions touched the familiar pressure points: Taiwan's status, the war in Ukraine, and the escalating confrontations in the South China Sea. No one expected these conversations to resolve the fundamental disagreements that divide the two powers. The U.S. pursued them anyway, betting that dialogue itself—the mere fact of two militaries talking rather than only posturing—could reduce the risk of miscalculation.
The breakdown had been total. In 2021, as tensions over Taiwan, COVID-19's origins, and trade disputes deepened, the military-to-military communication channel simply closed. Beijing had repeatedly rebuffed American requests to reengage, particularly after incidents involving aircraft and ships operating in close proximity. That freeze lasted until November, when President Joe Biden and President Xi Jinping met in San Francisco and agreed to restore the line. January brought the first talks; this week brought the second.
But the South China Sea tells a different story than diplomatic niceties. In August, a Philippine ship and a Chinese vessel collided, leaving both damaged—the Philippine vessel with visible gaping holes. The Philippines accused China of ramming; China accused the Philippines of reckless maneuvering. More recently, a Philippine coast guard ship, the BRP Teresa Magbanua, had been stationed at Sabina Shoal, a shallow formation that both nations claim. China responded by deploying forty ships to block any resupply attempt. The Philippine crew needed food, fuel, and medical attention. On Sunday, the ship withdrew to get those things.
China's framing was immediate and territorial. A Coast Guard spokesperson, Liu Dejun, said the departure confirmed what Beijing had always maintained—that the Philippine presence "infringed on China's territorial sovereignty." He added that China had "taken control measures against the ship in accordance with the law" and that multiple Philippine attempts to resupply had "failed." The language was calm, the implication unmistakable: China had won that particular standoff.
What happens next is unclear. The Philippines said it would send a replacement vessel, but the question hanging over the shoal is whether China will now occupy it. Filipino scientists have documented submerged piles of crushed coral in the shallows—evidence, they worry, that China is preparing to build some kind of structure there, a way of physically asserting its claim. The U.S. defense official briefing reporters said they were "watching further developments there very closely," a phrase that captures the helplessness of observation when the moves are being made by others.
The timing of these military talks matters, and not just because they represent a thaw. The U.S. is heading into a presidential election, and it remains unclear whether the incoming administration—whoever wins—will maintain this channel or let it freeze again. For now, the two sides are talking. Whether that talking can slow the momentum of events in the South China Sea, or whether it merely provides a venue for each side to explain its actions after the fact, is still an open question.
Bemerkenswerte Zitate
China had taken control measures against the ship in accordance with the law and multiple attempts by the Philippine side to forcibly resupply the ship had failed— Liu Dejun, China Coast Guard spokesperson
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte?
Das Original lesen bei Yahoo Canada Finance ↗
War & Conflict