U.S., China Cut Tariffs 80% in 90-Day Deal, But Rates Remain Above Pre-Trump Levels

The tariff war had not ended. It had simply entered a new phase.
The 90-day deal provides immediate relief but leaves the fundamental trade dispute unresolved.
Mark

So the tariffs dropped from 145 percent to 30 percent—that's a massive cut. Why is anyone still worried?

Mimi

Because 30 percent is still three times the rate that existed before Trump took office. The baseline shifted. Even with the reduction, American businesses are paying more than they used to.

Luke

And it's only for 90 days. If negotiations fail, we're back where we started or potentially worse.

Mark

What happens to a company like Wyze in the meantime? They paid $255,000 in tariffs on a $167,000 purchase.

Mimi

That's the real question. With the tariff cut, their costs drop significantly, but they're still higher than pre-Trump levels. Whether they pass savings to customers or absorb them depends on their margins and market pressure.

Luke

We don't actually know what Wyze or other companies will do with the savings. That's not in the reporting. We know the tariff changed; we don't know the downstream pricing.

Mark

The stock market loved it. Tesla up 7 percent, Best Buy up 10 percent. Does that tell us something real about the deal's impact?

Mimi

It tells us investors believe the worst-case scenario—a prolonged trade war at 145 percent—has been avoided. That's worth money to them.

Luke

But stock movements are forward-looking and speculative. They're pricing in hope that negotiations succeed. If they don't, those gains evaporate.

Mark

So this is genuinely temporary relief, not a solution.

Mimi

Exactly. It's breathing room. But the underlying conflict hasn't been resolved.

  • Markets had been bracing for months under the weight of a 145% U.S. tariff on Chinese goods — a rate so severe that one camera company paid $255,000 in duties on a $167,000 order.
  • The announcement hit like a pressure valve releasing: tech stocks surged at Monday's opening bell, with Tesla and Amazon jumping over 7% and Best Buy spiking 10% as investors priced in the pause.
  • The mechanics of the deal are symmetrical — both sides cut roughly 115 percentage points, bringing U.S. tariffs to 30% and Chinese tariffs on American exports down to 10% for a 90-day window.
  • The asterisk is significant: 30% is still three times the 10% baseline that existed before the trade war escalated, meaning businesses are relieved but not restored.
  • The 90-day clock is already ticking — if talks stall, tariffs could snap back or climb higher, leaving companies unable to plan and consumers unable to trust today's prices.

In the long arc of great-power rivalry, trade has always been both weapon and olive branch. Over a Geneva weekend in May 2025, American and Chinese negotiators chose, at least briefly, the latter — agreeing to slash punishing tariffs for 90 days and giving markets, supply chains, and anxious businesses a moment to breathe. The relief is real but provisional: rates remain well above the pre-trade-war baseline, and the deeper questions of economic interdependence between the world's two largest economies remain unanswered.

On a Monday morning in May, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent delivered news that had been hammered out over a Geneva weekend: the United States and China had agreed to a temporary truce in their trade war. The reaction on Wall Street was swift and dramatic. Tesla and Amazon surged more than 7 percent, Apple climbed 6 percent, and Best Buy — a bellwether for consumer electronics — spiked 10 percent. Markets were pricing in something they had feared might never come: a pause in the tariff spiral.

The deal's structure was straightforward. Trump's 145 percent reciprocal tariff on Chinese goods would fall to 30 percent for 90 days, while China would lower its tariff on American exports from 125 percent to 10 percent. Both sides cut roughly 115 percentage points — enough to ease the immediate strain on supply chains and buy negotiators time to pursue something more lasting.

But the relief carried a significant caveat. That 30 percent rate, while far below 145 percent, is still three times the 10 percent baseline that existed before the trade war began. For businesses that had built their models around predictable trade conditions, this was not a homecoming — it was a new and still-elevated normal.

The preceding months had been punishing. When the 145 percent tariff first landed in early April, stock markets convulsed and supply chain managers scrambled. Companies manufacturing in China faced an untenable choice between absorbing costs or passing them to customers. The technology sector, deeply reliant on Chinese production, bore the sharpest pain.

The 90-day window is both relief and reminder. This is a pause, not a resolution. If negotiations falter, tariffs could return to their previous heights or climb further still. Businesses cannot yet plan with confidence, and consumers cannot assume today's prices will hold. The trade war has not ended — it has simply entered a more uncertain, watchful phase.

Scott Bessent, the Treasury Secretary, woke up the financial world on a Monday morning in May with news that had been negotiated over a Geneva weekend: the United States and China had struck a temporary truce in their escalating trade war. The relief was immediate and visible. Tech stocks surged at the opening bell—Tesla and Amazon jumped more than 7 percent, Apple climbed 6 percent, Meta and Nvidia each gained 5 percent, and Best Buy, the electronics retailer, saw its shares spike 10 percent. The market was pricing in something it had feared for months: that the tariff spiral might finally pause.

The deal itself was straightforward in its mechanics, if not in its implications. Trump's reciprocal tariff on Chinese goods—set at a punishing 145 percent—would drop to 30 percent for the next 90 days. China, in turn, would lower its tariff on American exports from 125 percent to just 10 percent. Each side had essentially cut its rates by roughly 115 percentage points. It was a significant reduction, enough to ease the immediate pressure on supply chains and give negotiators time to work toward something more permanent.

But the relief came with a crucial asterisk. That 30 percent rate, while dramatically lower than 145 percent, remained three times higher than the flat 10 percent tariff that had been in place before Trump took office. For companies that had grown accustomed to predictable trade conditions, this was not a return to normal—it was a new, elevated baseline. The tariff landscape had shifted, and even with the cuts, American businesses and consumers would still be paying more than they had before.

The previous months had been brutal. When Trump first imposed the 145 percent tariff in early April, the stock market had convulsed over a four-day stretch, and supply chain managers across the technology sector had scrambled to find workarounds. Companies manufacturing in China faced an impossible choice: absorb the tariff costs themselves or pass them along to customers. Wyze, a security camera manufacturer, had paid $255,000 in tariffs on a $167,000 purchase—a stark illustration of how the math had become untenable. Electronics and technology companies, which rely heavily on Chinese manufacturing, had been hit hardest.

The 90-day window was both a relief and a reminder of fragility. This was not a permanent settlement. It was a pause—a chance for both sides to continue talking while the immediate pressure eased. If those negotiations stalled or failed, the tariffs could snap back to their previous levels or climb even higher. Businesses could not plan for the long term. Consumers could not assume that the prices they saw today would hold. The deal had bought time, but it had not bought certainty.

For Wall Street and Silicon Valley, for small business owners and ordinary shoppers, the announcement meant they could exhale. The immediate crisis had been averted. But everyone understood the conditional nature of the relief. The tariff war had not ended. It had simply entered a new phase, one where the outcome remained genuinely uncertain and the stakes remained very high.

The deal is only a temporary, 90-day agreement; if negotiations fail, tariffs could escalate further.
— Reporting from the trade agreement announcement
Contact Us FAQ