In the contested east of Ukraine, where Moscow has declared the outcome already written, the ground tells a different story. Ukrainian forces have reclaimed territory in the Donbas and, more critically, have prevented Russian units from completing the encirclement of the fortress belt cities that anchor Kyiv's remaining hold on the region. The gap between a power's proclaimed certainty and the stubborn resistance of those who refuse to accept it is one of war's oldest tensions — and here, that gap remains very much open.
Ukraine Reclaims Ground in Donbas Despite Russian Encirclement Efforts
The outcome remains genuinely uncertain despite what Moscow's official statements suggest.
Mark
So Ukraine is actually taking back territory in Donbas? I thought Russia was advancing everywhere in the east.
Mimi
They are advancing in some places, but not everywhere at the same pace. What's notable is that Ukrainian forces have prevented Russia from completing encirclement operations around the fortress cities—the fortified positions that are crucial to Ukraine's defense.
Luke
But we should be clear about what "prevented" means here. Are we talking about a complete halt to Russian encirclement efforts, or are we saying Ukraine has slowed them down? The source material doesn't give us specific numbers on territory reclaimed or the scale of these operations.
Mimi
Fair point. The reporting confirms that Ukraine has clawed back ground and disrupted encirclement attempts, but you're right that we don't have precise measurements of how much territory or how many cities are still under threat.
Mark
Why does the fortress belt matter so much? Why not just retreat further west?
Mimi
Because losing those cities would mean losing the last major defensive positions in Donbas. Once they fall, Russia would have a much clearer path into the rest of eastern Ukraine. The fortress belt is the line that, if broken, makes the entire eastern front collapse.
Luke
And Moscow is saying capture is inevitable. Do we know if that's based on actual military analysis or if it's just propaganda to demoralize Ukraine?
Mimi
The source doesn't distinguish between the two. We know Moscow is making the claim, and we know Ukraine's actions on the ground are contradicting it. But whether that claim reflects genuine Russian confidence or is purely a messaging strategy—that's not answered here.
Mark
So what happens next? Does this mean Ukraine can hold the line indefinitely?
Mimi
The reporting suggests a prolonged contest with no clear winner yet. Neither side has achieved decisive advantage. But that's also the honest answer—we don't know how long Ukraine can sustain this or whether Russia will eventually break through.
Luke
And that's important to say plainly. The story is about what's happening now, not about predicting the future. Ukraine has prevented encirclement so far. That's the fact we can confirm.
Der Puls
- Russia has staked its credibility on the claim that Donbas is already lost for Ukraine, but Ukrainian counteroperations have repeatedly broken the encirclement attempts before they could close.
- The fortress belt cities — fortified anchors of Ukraine's eastern defense — remain supplied and defended, denying Moscow the symbolic and strategic collapse it has been publicly forecasting.
- Ukrainian commanders have demonstrated a tactical capacity to identify encirclement operations in motion and strike at the forces executing them, keeping supply lines alive under sustained pressure.
- Russian forces continue to advance in some sectors and retain significant manpower advantages, meaning the overall situation for Kyiv remains grave even as specific Russian objectives go unmet.
- The battlefield has settled into a grinding, costly contest in which neither side can dictate terms — a prolonged stalemate measured in blood and kilometers, with no clean resolution in sight.
In the contested east of Ukraine, where Moscow has declared the outcome already written, the ground tells a different story. Ukrainian forces have reclaimed territory in the Donbas and, more critically, have prevented Russian units from completing the encirclement of the fortress belt cities that anchor Kyiv's remaining hold on the region. The gap between a power's proclaimed certainty and the stubborn resistance of those who refuse to accept it is one of war's oldest tensions — and here, that gap remains very much open.
Moscow has declared the outcome in Donbas a foregone conclusion. Yet in recent weeks, Ukrainian forces have reclaimed ground and — more significantly — prevented Russian units from completing the encirclement of the fortress belt, a chain of fortified cities that represent Ukraine's last major defensive anchors in the east. Their loss would mark a catastrophic shift in the war's geography.
Russian strategy has centered on surrounding these positions, severing supply lines, and forcing surrender or destruction — a tactic with precedent in other wars. But Ukrainian commanders have kept those lines open and mounted counteroffensives that disrupt encirclement attempts before they can close. The fortress cities remain contested, not fallen.
This is not a story of Ukrainian victory. Russian forces continue to advance in some sectors, and the broader trajectory of the war still favors Moscow in territory gained. But the specific claim that encirclement is inevitable has not survived contact with Ukrainian resistance. The gap between the Kremlin's public confidence and the actual state of the battlefield is telling — when a military power declares something predetermined, it is either expressing genuine certainty or attempting to manufacture it through messaging. Here, the results have not matched the rhetoric.
What the situation reveals is a conflict that will not resolve quickly or cleanly. Russia retains initiative and manpower; Ukraine retains the will to resist and the tactical skill to disrupt. The result is a grinding stalemate in which every kilometer costs both sides dearly, and in which the outcome — despite what Moscow's statements insist — remains genuinely uncertain.
Moscow has declared the outcome in Donbas a foregone conclusion. The Kremlin's messaging is consistent and unambiguous: the region will fall. Yet on the ground, Ukrainian forces have managed something that contradicts that certainty. They have reclaimed territory in recent weeks and, more significantly, they have prevented Russian units from completing the encirclement operations that would seal off the so-called fortress belt—a chain of fortified cities that represent Ukraine's last major defensive positions in the east.
The fortress belt cities are not merely symbolic. They are the anchors of Ukraine's remaining hold on Donbas, and their loss would represent a catastrophic shift in the war's geography. Russian strategy has centered on surrounding these positions, cutting them off from supply and reinforcement, and forcing either surrender or destruction. It is a tactic that has worked in other theaters and other wars. But here, Ukrainian commanders have managed to keep supply lines open and to mount counteroffensives that disrupt Russian encirclement attempts before they can close.
This is not a story of Ukrainian victory in the traditional sense. The battlefield remains contested and fluid. Russian forces continue to advance in some sectors. The overall trajectory of the war still favors Moscow in terms of territory gained and held. But the specific claim that encirclement is inevitable—that the fortress cities are already lost, that the outcome is predetermined—has not held up to contact with Ukrainian resistance.
The gap between Moscow's public confidence and the actual state of the battlefield is worth examining. When a military power declares something inevitable, it is often a signal of either genuine strategic certainty or an attempt to create that certainty through messaging. In this case, the Kremlin's assertions have not been matched by results. Ukrainian forces have shown the capacity to identify where encirclement is being attempted and to strike at the forces executing those operations. They have also managed to maintain the logistics necessary to keep their fortress cities supplied and their defenders equipped.
What makes this significant is not that Ukraine is winning in Donbas—the situation remains dire for Kyiv in many respects—but that the war has not resolved into the kind of static, predetermined outcome that Moscow has been describing. The fortress belt remains contested. The encirclement remains incomplete. And Ukrainian soldiers and commanders continue to find ways to fight, to move, and to deny Russia the clean victory that Moscow says is already assured.
The territorial dynamics suggest a conflict that will not be settled quickly or cleanly. Neither side has achieved the kind of decisive advantage that would allow it to dictate terms. Russia retains the initiative in many places and the manpower to sustain operations. Ukraine retains the will to resist and the tactical skill to disrupt Russian plans. The result is a grinding, costly stalemate in which both sides continue to pay in blood and material for every kilometer of ground, and in which the outcome remains genuinely uncertain despite what Moscow's official statements suggest.
Bemerkenswerte Zitate
Moscow says its capture of the region is inevitable— Russian government statements
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte?
Das Original lesen bei The New York Times ↗
War & Conflict