On September 30th, somewhere over the skies of Jordan and Saudi Arabia, a carefully concealed plan to repeat the logic of September 11th came within moments of succeeding. A FlyDubai co-pilot, radicalized years earlier and methodical in his preparation, attacked his captain mid-flight with an axe, intending to crash the aircraft into Tel Aviv's passenger terminal with 174 people aboard. The plot was stopped not by any system designed to catch it, but by the bloodied captain's courage and the hands of ordinary passengers. What lingers is not only the nearness of catastrophe, but the silence of
UAE: FlyDubai co-pilot planned 9/11-style attack on Tel Aviv airport
He had used two previous flights to study the route and the airport's layout.
So the co-pilot actually confessed to planning this? He laid it all out?
Yes. He admitted to acting alone and gave what authorities called a detailed confession about his motives and how he planned it. He said he'd used two earlier flights to study the route and the airport.
But we should be careful here—we're getting this through the UAE prosecutor's statement. We don't have independent access to that confession or its contents. We're taking the official account at face value.
Fair point. What about the radicalization part—the mosque in Australia?
The prosecutor said he attended university there in 2017 and became radicalized at a mosque, but again, that's the prosecutor's characterization based on what Hammami told them.
Right. We don't know what "radicalized at a mosque" actually means in this context. Did he attend once? Was he part of a group? We're working with a single official source here.
And the 9/11 inspiration—did he say that directly?
The prosecutor said he "drew inspiration" from 9/11, but we don't have his exact words. It's the prosecutor's summary of what Hammami told them.
Which matters. There's a difference between "I studied 9/11" and "I want to replicate 9/11." The prosecutor is interpreting.
What strikes me most is that FlyDubai's security checks found nothing.
That's the real gap. He passed all their vetting. He'd flown the route before without raising alarms. No one saw this coming.
Which raises a question we can't answer from this reporting: what would have caught him? What should have? That's worth sitting with.
El Pulso
- A co-pilot turned the cockpit into a crime scene at cruising altitude, beating the captain with an axe while 174 passengers flew unknowingly toward potential mass death.
- The aircraft plunged 14,000 to 16,000 feet in under a minute as passengers physically wrestled the attacker into submission — aviation order collapsing into desperate improvisation.
- Two reserve pilots on board seized the controls and brought the plane to an emergency landing in Tabuk, Saudi Arabia, converting chaos into survival by the narrowest of margins.
- Investigators revealed the attack was no sudden rupture — the suspect had flown the Dubai-to-Tel Aviv route twice before as deliberate reconnaissance, studying the flight path and terminal layout.
- The radicalization trail leads back to a mosque in Melbourne in 2017, raising urgent questions about how a man who had planned a 9/11-inspired suicide mission passed every professional and security filter for years.
On September 30th, somewhere over the skies of Jordan and Saudi Arabia, a carefully concealed plan to repeat the logic of September 11th came within moments of succeeding. A FlyDubai co-pilot, radicalized years earlier and methodical in his preparation, attacked his captain mid-flight with an axe, intending to crash the aircraft into Tel Aviv's passenger terminal with 174 people aboard. The plot was stopped not by any system designed to catch it, but by the bloodied captain's courage and the hands of ordinary passengers. What lingers is not only the nearness of catastrophe, but the silence of every screening and vetting process that should have spoken first.
On September 30th, a FlyDubai flight carrying 174 passengers was crossing the airspace above Jordan and Saudi Arabia when co-pilot Hamam al-Hammami, a 29-year-old Omani national, entered the cockpit and attacked the captain with a crash axe. Captain Smit Machchhar, bloodied and beaten, managed to open the cockpit door and alert the crew. Passengers physically restrained Hammami as the aircraft dropped roughly 14,000 to 16,000 feet in under a minute. Two reserve pilots on board took control and landed the plane safely at Tabuk airport in Saudi Arabia.
What emerged afterward was far more deliberate than a sudden act of violence. According to the UAE's top prosecutor, Hammami had intended to seize full control of the aircraft and crash it into the passenger terminal at Tel Aviv airport — Israel's main international hub — with the explicit goal of maximizing casualties. Most of those aboard were Israeli nationals. He had drawn direct inspiration from the September 11th attacks, and had used two prior flights on the same route to study the flight path and familiarize himself with the airport's layout. This was reconnaissance disguised as routine work.
In his confession, made in the presence of his lawyer, Hammami stated he had acted entirely alone. Authorities traced his radicalization to 2017, when he was studying at the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology in Australia and, the prosecutor indicated, became radicalized at a mosque during that period.
No one died. The captain survived. The passengers who physically stopped Hammami likely prevented a catastrophe measured in hundreds of lives. But the distance between what happened and what nearly did — between a bloodied cockpit and a burning terminal — was impossibly, uncomfortably small. Every professional vetting process, every security protocol, had seen nothing.
On September 30th, a FlyDubai flight carrying 174 passengers was crossing the airspace above Jordan and Saudi Arabia when the co-pilot, a 29-year-old Omani national named Hamam al-Hammami, entered the cockpit and attacked the captain with a crash axe. Captain Smit Machchhar, bloodied and beaten, managed to open the cockpit door and alert the crew and passengers to what was happening. In the chaos that followed, passengers physically restrained Hammami while the aircraft dropped roughly 14,000 to 16,000 feet in less than a minute. Two reserve pilots who were on board took control and guided the plane to an emergency landing at Tabuk airport in Saudi Arabia.
What emerged in the weeks after, according to the UAE's top prosecutor, was far more deliberate than a sudden act of rage. Hammami had not simply snapped. He had planned to seize full control of the aircraft and fly it directly into the passenger terminal at Tel Aviv airport—Israel's main international hub. The prosecutor's statement, released through the state news agency, said he intended to maximize casualties. Most of the passengers aboard were Israeli nationals.
The prosecutor revealed that Hammami had drawn explicit inspiration from the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States. More striking still, he had used two previous flights on the same Dubai-to-Tel Aviv route to study the flight path and familiarize himself with the airport's layout. This was not impulse. This was reconnaissance. Yet FlyDubai's security protocols and professional vetting had flagged nothing—no extremist views, no warning signs, no indication that this pilot posed any threat.
In his confession, delivered in the presence of his lawyer, Hammami admitted he had acted entirely alone, with no involvement from others. He provided what authorities described as a detailed account of his motives and the stages of his planning and execution. The prosecutor's statement suggested a pathway to radicalization: Hammami had attended the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology in Australia in 2017, and it was during that time, the statement indicated, that he became radicalized at a mosque.
The incident unfolded with brutal speed. One moment the flight was routine; the next, the captain was under assault in the cockpit. The passengers and crew who physically stopped Hammami and helped stabilize the aircraft likely prevented a catastrophe that could have killed hundreds. The plane landed safely. No one died. But the gap between what happened and what could have happened—between the captain's bloodied face and a terminal full of people—remained impossibly narrow.
Citas Notables
He acted with the intention of causing the greatest possible number of human casualties— UAE top prosecutor, via state news agency WAM
He admitted that he had acted alone, without the involvement of others— UAE prosecutor's statement