In mid-September 2026, Turkish authorities swept through Istanbul, Ankara, and Izmir, arresting LGBTQ+ activists and silencing more than a hundred digital voices in a single weekend — all beneath the banner of family protection. The operation, tied to President Erdoğan's 'Decade of Family and Population' initiative, reveals a recurring tension in modern governance: the use of cultural tradition as both shield and weapon, criminalizing identity through enforcement rather than legislation. Where formal law leaves LGBTQ+ relationships untouched, state practice has moved to erase their presence fr
Turkey's LGBTQ+ crackdown sparks backlash from rights groups and EU
Multiple LGBTQ+ activists were arrested; individuals were taken from their homes at night; digital access to civil society organizations was restricted.
Criminalizing without changing the law
Mark
So the government says this is about protecting families and fixing the birthrate. Is that actually what's happening here, or is that just cover?
Mimi
It's the stated rationale, but look at what the critics are saying—Taghizade and others point out that if you actually cared about family stability, you'd be addressing poverty, housing, unemployment. Those are the real pressures on families. The LGBTQ+ framing feels like it's doing different work.
Luke
Right, but we should be careful here. We know the government *says* it's about family and birthrate. We know critics *interpret* it as criminalization. Those are two different things. The government might genuinely believe both things are true.
Mimi
Fair. But the pattern matters. This isn't the first time. Taghizade says criminalization has been happening for years. And blocking 100+ accounts in a weekend, including Amnesty International Turkey—that's not incidental.
Mark
Who actually got arrested? The source doesn't give names or numbers.
Luke
That's a real gap. We know people were arrested, we know activists were targeted, but we don't have specifics. We don't know how many, who they are, what they're being charged with. That's important information we're missing.
Mimi
The Medical Association called it taking people from their homes at night. That's the human reality of it, even without names.
Mark
And the EU response—is that likely to change anything?
Luke
The EU said it's incompatible with their values and that Turkey should respect human rights as an accession candidate. But Turkey has been an accession candidate for decades. Statements of concern are one thing; actual consequences are another.
Mimi
True. But the fact that it's being flagged internationally, that women's organizations are standing with LGBTQ+ groups, that the Medical Association is speaking up—that creates pressure, even if it's not immediate.
Mark
So what's the actual legal basis for the account blocks?
Luke
An Istanbul court order from September 13, citing investigations into "obscene content and LGBTQ+ propaganda." Some outlets also reported "national security" as grounds. But "LGBTQ+ propaganda" isn't a crime in Turkey. Homosexuality isn't illegal. So the legal theory here is unclear.
Mimi
Which is exactly the point the critics are making—they're criminalizing without changing the law. They're using existing tools in new ways.
Le Pouls
- Over a single weekend, police raided homes at night across three cities, arresting activists while courts simultaneously blocked over 100 social media accounts belonging to LGBTQ+ groups, human rights organizations, and independent media.
- The government framed the crackdown as defending families and reversing a declining birthrate, but critics — including analysts, doctors, and opposition politicians — argued it was a coordinated effort to erase LGBTQ+ people from political and public life without passing new laws.
- Demonstrations broke out in Istanbul within days; 120 women's organizations signed a joint condemnation, drawing an explicit line between the suppression of LGBTQ+ organizing and the broader repression of women's rights and civil society.
- The Turkish Medical Association called the raids human rights violations, while the EU reminded Turkey that as an accession candidate it is bound to uphold the dignity of all people regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity.
- The operation is landing in a charged and unresolved space — homosexuality remains legal in Turkey, yet the state's language and actions increasingly treat LGBTQ+ identity as criminal, leaving activists, international observers, and civil society bracing for what comes next.
In mid-September 2026, Turkish authorities swept through Istanbul, Ankara, and Izmir, arresting LGBTQ+ activists and silencing more than a hundred digital voices in a single weekend — all beneath the banner of family protection. The operation, tied to President Erdoğan's 'Decade of Family and Population' initiative, reveals a recurring tension in modern governance: the use of cultural tradition as both shield and weapon, criminalizing identity through enforcement rather than legislation. Where formal law leaves LGBTQ+ relationships untouched, state practice has moved to erase their presence from public life. The world watches to see whether international commitments — and the long, unresolved question of Turkey's EU accession — will bend the arc of this moment.
Over a weekend in mid-September, Turkish police moved simultaneously across Istanbul, Ankara, and Izmir — raiding homes, detaining activists, and triggering the suspension of more than 100 social media accounts within hours. Among those silenced were Amnesty International Turkey, the Kaos GL rights group, and the independent Evrensel newspaper. An Istanbul court had authorized the blocking order on September 13, with prosecutors invoking investigations into 'obscene content,' 'LGBTQ+ propaganda,' and threats to national security.
President Erdoğan had anchored the operation in his 'Decade of Family and Population' strategy — a national initiative announced in 2025 to reverse Turkey's declining birthrate and reinforce traditional family values. The accompanying slogan was 'My family is safe.' But the breadth of the crackdown, reaching well beyond LGBTQ+ organizations to encompass human rights groups and media outlets, pointed toward a wider ambition: limiting the visibility and organizing power of LGBTQ+ people and their allies across Turkish public life.
The response was rapid and broad-based. Protests erupted in Istanbul. Turkish LGBTQ+ associations issued a joint declaration insisting that forming associations and advocating for rights were not crimes. One hundred twenty women's organizations signed a collective condemnation, explicitly connecting the assault on LGBTQ+ organizing to the repression of women's bodies and political agency. The Turkish Medical Association called it unacceptable to remove people from their homes at night in the name of security. Opposition politicians demanded the immediate release of those arrested.
Analyst Yildiz Taghizade argued the operation was part of a longer strategy to criminalize LGBTQ+ identity through enforcement rather than legislation — effectively banning the community from politics, organizing, and public presence without formally changing the law. She also challenged the government's framing directly: the real threats to family stability in Turkey, she said, were poverty, the housing crisis, unemployment, and male violence against women — not the existence of LGBTQ+ people.
The European Union reminded Turkey that its status as an accession candidate carries obligations to protect the dignity of all individuals regardless of gender identity or sexual orientation, and that stigmatization runs contrary to the union's core values. Human Rights Watch echoed this, describing the arrests as evidence of a deliberate strategy of criminalization through practice rather than law. Homosexual relationships remain legal in Turkey — but the distance between what the law permits and what the state tolerates has rarely felt wider.
Over a weekend in mid-September, Turkish authorities moved against LGBTQ+ organizations across three major cities. Police conducted raids in Istanbul, Ankara, and Izmir, making arrests and detaining activists. Simultaneously, the government blocked digital access—more than 100 social media accounts belonging to LGBTQ+ groups, human rights organizations, and independent media outlets were suspended within hours. The accounts included those of Amnesty International Turkey, the Kaos GL rights group, the Academics for Peace initiative, and the left-leaning Evrensel newspaper. An Istanbul court had issued the blocking order on September 13, with prosecutors citing investigations into accounts spreading "obscene content and LGBTQ+ propaganda" and, according to several media reports, threats to "national security."
President Recep Tayyip Erdogan had framed the operation as part of the "Decade of Family and Population," a national strategy announced in May 2025 designed to reverse Turkey's declining birthrate and reinforce what the government describes as traditional family values. The slogan accompanying the crackdown was "My family is safe." Yet the timing and scope suggested something broader: a coordinated effort to restrict the visibility and organizing capacity of LGBTQ+ persons and their allies in public life.
The response was swift and broad. On Tuesday, demonstrations erupted in Istanbul. Turkish LGBTQ+ associations released a joint declaration asserting that forming an association and advocating for rights were not crimes, and that "freedom of assembly, freedom of opinion, protection of privacy and presumption of innocence apply to LGBTQ+ people as well." The women's rights movement joined the pushback. One hundred twenty women's organizations signed a collective statement condemning what they called authoritarianism, drawing a direct line between the crackdown on LGBTQ+ persons and the repression of women's bodies, identities, and organizing capacity. "Being LGBTQ+ is not a crime," they declared. "Organizing as LGBTQ+ people is not a crime."
Yildiz Taghizade, an analyst with Women for Women's Human Rights, characterized the operation as part of a longer campaign to criminalize LGBTQ+ identity without formally changing the law. "The aim is not only to target LGBTQ+ people, but to practically ban the LGBTQ+ community from engaging in politics, getting organized, claiming rights and showing presence in the public sphere," Taghizade said. She also challenged the government's framing. The real sources of family instability in Turkey, she argued, were concrete: poverty, the housing crisis, unemployment, and male violence against women—not the existence of LGBTQ+ persons. The invocation of family protection, she suggested, was a rhetorical cover for something else.
Criticism came from unexpected quarters. The Turkish Medical Association condemned the raids as human rights violations, calling it unacceptable to treat gender identity and sexual orientation as crimes or to remove people from their homes at night in the name of security. Erkan Bas, chairman of the Workers' Party of Turkey, demanded the immediate release of those arrested and accused the government of using "judiciary, truncheon and censorship" against anyone who disagreed with its agenda. Justice Minister Akin Gurlek had previously accused LGBTQ+ organizations of "promoting immorality" and warned that "no criminal organization, abuse network or illegal activity which targets children, youths or families will be tolerated"—language that conflated LGBTQ+ identity with criminal conduct.
The European Union also weighed in. A Commission spokesperson noted that Turkey, as an EU accession candidate, has obligations to "promote and ensure respect for the human rights and dignity of all individuals, irrespective of their gender identity or sexual orientation," and that "stigmatization and discrimination are contrary to the values of the union." Emma Sinclair-Webb, Turkey director at Human Rights Watch, interpreted the arrests as evidence of a deliberate strategy: criminalizing LGBTQ+ persons through enforcement and digital suppression rather than through new legislation.
Homosexual relationships are not illegal in Turkey. Yet the government has repeatedly referred to the LGBTQ+ community as "perverts," and the weekend operation demonstrated the gap between formal law and state practice. The blocking of over 100 accounts—including those of organizations with no direct LGBTQ+ focus—suggested a broader intent to isolate and silence dissent. What happens next will depend partly on whether the EU's concerns translate into concrete pressure on a candidate country that has long walked a line between democratic commitments and authoritarian impulse.
Citations marquantes
The aim is not only to target LGBTQ+ people, but to practically ban the LGBTQ+ community from engaging in politics, getting organized, claiming rights and showing presence in the public sphere.— Yildiz Taghizade, Women for Women's Human Rights
Stigmatization and discrimination are contrary to the values of the union.— EU Commission Spokesperson Christian Wigand
Envie de l'histoire complète ?
Lire l'original sur Deutsche Welle ↗
Politics & Governance