Trump's tariffs squeeze US manufacturers as midterm elections loom

Job recruitment paused and workforce downsizing reported at affected manufacturers; some firms have lost customers.
There's only so much the end consumer will eat
A manufacturer explains why tariff costs cannot simply be passed along to customers without losing business.
Mark

So Doug Rende is losing millions a year to tariffs. That's a real number. But how much of that is the tariff itself versus the Iran war pushing up shipping costs?

Mimi

That's the thing—they're tangled together now. The tariff on aluminum is 50 percent. That's the policy choice. But then the Iran war adds another layer. Rende said surcharges alone are over $6,500 per container. So it's not one thing; it's a pile-on.

Luke

Right, but we should be careful here. Rende says $4.5 to $5 million in added costs this year. Is that all tariff, or is that tariff plus freight plus everything else? The source doesn't break it down that cleanly.

Mimi

Fair point. He's describing the total hit to his business. The tariff is the policy lever, but the freight surge is real too—it's tied to the geopolitical situation. Both are happening at once.

Mark

And he's responding by not hiring and buying robots instead. That's a direct job loss.

Mimi

Yes. He paused recruitment and is investing in automation. That's a concrete consequence. Other firms have lost customers or downsized.

Luke

But we don't have numbers on how many jobs are actually being cut across the sector. We have anecdotes—Rende, Miller—but not a regional or national count. The chamber president says some firms have lost customers, but that's vague.

Mark

So the human cost is real but not fully quantified.

Luke

Exactly. We know it's happening. We don't know the scale.

Mimi

The Democrats are betting it's big enough to matter in November. That's the political angle—they think tariff pain will shift votes.

Mark

And the manufacturers themselves? Are they turning against Trump?

Mimi

Miller said he thinks there will be a shift away from Republican views. Rende said he's lost trust in the administration and Congress. But these are two guys in Ohio. We don't have polling on whether the broader business community is moving.

Luke

And some manufacturers have benefited from tariffs—the source mentions that. We just don't hear from them in this story.

Mark

So it's a real squeeze, but the full picture is still incomplete.

Mimi

Right. The tariffs are climbing, the Iran war is complicating things, and manufacturers are hurting. That's solid. The question of whether it changes the midterms is still open.

  • An Ohio aluminum manufacturer has absorbed up to $5 million in a single year as tariff rates climbed from 10% to 50%, leaving him with no room to grow and no choice but to replace workers with robots.
  • A U.S.-Iran war has sent freight surcharges soaring past $6,500 per container, turning a trade policy dispute into a cascading supply chain crisis that manufacturers never anticipated.
  • Canada — Ohio's single largest export market — has become a battleground of retaliatory tariffs, stalling a planned distribution facility and forcing businesses to absorb compounding duties every time goods cross the border.
  • The business community is not uniformly opposed to tariffs, but voices like the Youngstown Warren Regional Chamber are drawing a sharp line between protecting critical industries and imposing blanket duties on materials that America cannot yet produce at scale.
  • With midterms approaching, Democrats are watching manufacturer frustration harden into political disillusionment — and some business owners are already predicting a shift away from Republican support among their peers.

In the manufacturing heartland of Ohio, a quiet reckoning is underway — one that asks whether the tools meant to protect an industry can, in practice, hollow it out. Since President Trump's return to office in January 2025, escalating tariffs on aluminum, steel, and autos have added millions in costs to businesses already operating on thin margins, while geopolitical turbulence from a U.S.-Iran war compounds the pressure through surging freight costs and disrupted supply chains. As midterm elections draw near, the human consequences — frozen hiring, shelved expansions, lost customers — are becoming a political question as much as an economic one.

Doug Rende runs Shapes Unlimited in North Jackson, Ohio, fabricating aluminum fences and railings. When he talks about his business today, the first word he reaches for is frustration. Since January 2025, his company has absorbed between $4.5 and $5 million in added annual costs as tariffs on aluminum climbed from 10 percent during Trump's first term to 25 percent, and then to 50 percent. For a manufacturer working on thin margins, that escalation is not a policy abstraction — it is money that has to come from somewhere. Rende has paused hiring and is investing in robotic assembly instead, a shift that means fewer jobs, not more.

He is not alone. In Warren, Ohio, Sam Miller runs a kitchen and bathroom products company that imports materials from Asia while trying to expand into Canada. A Supreme Court ruling briefly delivered refunds on some duties, but the administration reinstated most of them. The uncertainty itself carries a price: Miller's planned Canadian distribution facility has stalled indefinitely. Meanwhile, the U.S. war with Iran has driven freight surcharges above $6,500 per container and disrupted aluminum supplies through drone attacks in the region — pressures that compound what tariff policy alone has already set in motion.

Canada absorbs roughly a third of Ohio's exports, and when trade negotiations between Washington and Ottawa collapsed in August, retaliatory tariffs began rippling through supply chains in ways still unfolding. Some goods cross the border multiple times during production, meaning duties stack at each crossing. Guy Coviello, who leads the Youngstown Warren Regional Chamber of Commerce, called the overall picture negative for the region's roughly 3,000 member businesses. He supports targeted tariffs on critical goods — defense materials, medical supplies — but argues that blanket duties on aluminum, with no new domestic smelters to protect, raise costs for everyone downstream while shielding nothing.

As November midterms approach, Democrats see an opening in this accumulated grievance. Rende has lost confidence not just in the administration but in Congress's willingness to check executive power. Miller expects business owners to drift away from Republican views. Whether that sentiment becomes votes remains uncertain, but the arithmetic is plain: manufacturers are raising prices, freezing payrolls, and shelving growth — outcomes that look less like protection and more like the very damage the tariffs were meant to prevent.

Doug Rende runs Shapes Unlimited, an aluminum products manufacturer in North Jackson, Ohio, making building fixtures like fences and railings. When he sits down to talk about his business these days, the first word that comes out is frustration. Since January 2025, when President Trump returned to office and began imposing tariffs across multiple sectors, Rende's company has absorbed between $4.5 million and $5 million in additional costs in a single year alone. The tariffs on aluminum have climbed steadily—10 percent during Trump's first term, then 25 percent, then 50 percent last year. For a manufacturer operating on thin margins, that escalation is not an abstraction. It is money that has to come from somewhere.

Rende is not alone in feeling the squeeze. Across Ohio and beyond, American manufacturers who depend on imported materials or sell into neighboring markets are caught between rising input costs and customers who will only absorb so much price increase before they shop elsewhere. Sam Miller, who runs a kitchen and bathroom products company in Warren, Ohio, faces tariffs on materials he imports from Asia while simultaneously struggling to expand into Canada, where trade tensions have made doing business harder. When the Supreme Court struck down many of Trump's duties, Miller received refunds, but the administration has since reinstated most of them. The uncertainty itself is a cost—Miller had planned to open a distribution facility in Canada this year, but that project has stalled.

The tariff picture has grown more complicated by geopolitical events beyond trade policy. The U.S. war with Iran has driven up fuel prices and freight costs dramatically. Rende cited surcharges of more than $6,500 per container for goods arriving from suppliers, a direct consequence of elevated shipping expenses tied to Middle East tensions. Drone attacks in the region have also disrupted aluminum supplies. These cascading pressures have forced manufacturers to make hard choices. Rende has paused hiring for new positions and is investing instead in robotic assembly—a shift that means fewer jobs, not more. Other firms have downsized or lost customers outright.

Canada looms large in this equation. The country is Ohio's largest export market, absorbing roughly a third of the state's exports. When Washington and Ottawa imposed retaliatory tariffs on each other's goods after trade negotiations collapsed in August, the impact rippled through supply chains in ways that are still unfolding. Some goods cross the U.S.-Canada border multiple times during production, meaning tariffs compound at each crossing. Guy Coviello, president of the Youngstown Warren Regional Chamber of Commerce, which represents about 3,000 member businesses, described the situation as a "mixed bag" for firms but negative overall. He is watching three variables closely: tariffs, the Iran war, and immigration policy. All three, he said, are straining the region's manufacturers.

Coviello offered a nuanced view of tariff policy itself. He supports tariffs on critical goods—defense and medical products, for instance—where domestic production capacity matters for national security. But he pushed back on blanket duties on products that are neither essential nor available in sufficient quantity within the United States. With no new aluminum smelters operating domestically, tariffs on aluminum effectively protect nothing while raising costs for everyone downstream. The business community is not uniformly opposed to Trump's trade approach, but it is increasingly vocal about the gap between the stated goal of protecting American industry and the actual effect on manufacturers trying to compete and grow.

All of this is unfolding as midterm elections approach in November. Democrats see an opening. Grievances over tariff policy are among the fault lines they hope will shift voter sentiment, particularly in manufacturing-heavy states like Ohio. Rende himself expressed a loss of confidence not just in the administration but in the governmental process more broadly—in Congress's willingness to check executive power. Miller suggested he expects to see a shift away from Republican views among business owners. Whether that translates into votes remains to be seen, but the calculus is clear: manufacturers are hurting, jobs are being frozen or cut, and expansion plans are being shelved. The tariff wars that were meant to protect American industry are instead forcing American manufacturers to choose between raising prices, cutting payroll, or both.

There's only so much that the end consumer is willing to eat. So, we absorb a healthy portion.
— Doug Rende, CEO of Shapes Unlimited
I do think that there will be a shift away from Republican views.
— Sam Miller, Ohio manufacturer
Envie de l'histoire complète ? Lire l'original sur France 24 ↗
Nous contacter FAQ