On the 1,691st day of Russia's war against Ukraine, the architecture of Western solidarity showed new cracks — not from enemy fire, but from within. Donald Trump, having brokered a fuel deal with Vladimir Putin that eased Russia's economic isolation, publicly called for Ukraine to find new leadership, framing Zelenskyy not as an ally under siege but as an impediment to peace. The moment revealed how swiftly the geometry of a war can shift when the most powerful actor in the room changes its allegiances, even provisionally — and how much depends, in the end, on who gets to define what peace mea
Trump-Zelenskyy rift deepens over Russia fuel deal and peace talks
He has the support of the Ukrainian people, and they have the right to decide
So Trump made a deal with Putin to let Russian oil back into the market, and then turned around and blamed Zelenskyy for not wanting peace. How does that logic work?
It doesn't, really. But that's the point. Trump is using the fuel deal as leverage—he's showing Putin he can deliver concessions—and then using Zelenskyy's inevitable anger as proof that Ukraine is the problem. It's a pressure tactic dressed up as diplomacy.
But we should be careful here. Trump claimed Putin told him Russia wants a settlement "strongly." That's one source—Trump reporting what Putin allegedly said. We don't have Putin's own words on that. And Zelenskyy's position on negotiations isn't actually stated in the reporting. We know he called the fuel deal terrible, but we don't know his exact stance on peace talks.
Fair point. So what's actually happening with negotiations?
American negotiators Witkoff and Kushner are apparently heading to Moscow in the next two weeks. A Ukrainian delegation just came back from Miami talks. It looks like Trump is trying to move fast, but Zelenskyy's government isn't cooperating.
Again, "apparently." That's Russian state news reporting it. And we don't know what happened in Miami—the reporting just says the delegation is heading home. That could mean talks failed, or it could mean they were scheduled to end anyway.
What about the international response?
Britain and Germany both backed Zelenskyy immediately. Burnham called to offer solidarity, and Germany said it would keep pushing for new sanctions on Russia despite the fuel deal. It's a clear signal that Trump can't isolate Zelenskyy internationally.
True, but Britain and Germany aren't the United States. If Trump keeps the pressure on and uses American aid as leverage, that matters more than statements of solidarity. The real test is whether those countries will actually follow through on new sanctions and military support.
And the human cost?
Twenty civilians killed in Russian strikes on Saturday, including three children. That's what's happening while all this diplomatic maneuvering is going on.
Yes. And we should note that Russia's claims about what it struck—the data center, the cargo ship, the territorial gains—those are unverified. Reuters couldn't confirm them. So we know civilians died, but the military picture is still murky.
El Pulso
- Trump's demand that Zelenskyy 'stop' striking Russian refineries — paired with a public call for Ukraine's 'new leader' — landed like a political grenade inside an already exhausted alliance.
- The fuel deal with Putin, struck as Russian strikes killed twenty Ukrainian civilians including three children, struck Kyiv as not merely a concession but a betrayal of the sanctions architecture Ukraine had counted on to survive.
- Ukraine's foreign minister pushed back with quiet precision: Zelenskyy's mandate comes from the Ukrainian people, not from Washington, and foreign pressure only confirms he is doing his job.
- Britain and Germany moved quickly to close ranks around Kyiv — Burnham offering 'complete solidarity,' Berlin vowing continued EU sanctions — signaling that Europe would not simply follow Trump's diplomatic pivot.
- American negotiators Witkoff and Kushner are preparing a Moscow visit within two weeks, while a Ukrainian delegation returned from Miami talks empty-handed, leaving the shape of any future peace deeply uncertain.
On the 1,691st day of Russia's war against Ukraine, the architecture of Western solidarity showed new cracks — not from enemy fire, but from within. Donald Trump, having brokered a fuel deal with Vladimir Putin that eased Russia's economic isolation, publicly called for Ukraine to find new leadership, framing Zelenskyy not as an ally under siege but as an impediment to peace. The moment revealed how swiftly the geometry of a war can shift when the most powerful actor in the room changes its allegiances, even provisionally — and how much depends, in the end, on who gets to define what peace means.
On the 1,691st day of Russia's war in Ukraine, the alliance sustaining Kyiv's defense fractured in plain sight. Donald Trump had just brokered a deal returning Russian diesel to global markets — undercutting the sanctions regime Ukraine depended on — and then, speaking to reporters at the White House, called publicly for Ukraine to find a new leader. He claimed Putin had told him Moscow wanted a settlement 'strongly,' and suggested Zelenskyy was the obstacle. No evidence was offered. The accusation reshaped the diplomatic landscape anyway.
Zelenskyy called the fuel deal 'terrible' and 'not fair and not honest' — words that carried the weight of betrayal rather than mere disagreement. The deal arrived as Russian strikes killed twenty Ukrainian civilians, including three children, making its timing feel especially brutal.
The international response moved quickly to fill the vacuum. British Prime Minister Andy Burnham called Kyiv to offer 'complete solidarity,' acknowledging the day had been hard and pledging a face-to-face meeting within days. Germany said it would press ahead with new EU sanctions and maintain its support for Ukraine's defense, regardless of Washington's new posture.
Ukraine's foreign minister, Andriy Sybiga, answered Trump's call for Zelenskyy's removal with measured clarity: the Ukrainian people hold that right, not foreign capitals, and pressure from abroad only confirms their president is doing his job well.
Behind the public drama, the machinery of negotiation was already turning. American envoys Witkoff and Kushner were reportedly preparing a Moscow visit within two weeks. A Ukrainian delegation returning from Miami talks came home with nothing to show for them. In the Kremlin, Trump's remarks were celebrated as 'historic' — proof, Moscow claimed, that even Washington now understood Ukraine needed leadership 'focused on peace.' The war itself continued, indifferent to all of it.
On day 1,691 of Russia's war in Ukraine, the alliance holding Kyiv's defense began to fracture visibly. Donald Trump, freshly into his presidency, had just brokered a deal allowing Russian diesel back onto global markets—a move that infuriated Zelenskyy—and then called publicly for Ukraine to find a new leader. The timing was not accidental. It was a pressure campaign, delivered in real time, with the weight of American power behind it.
Trump's demands came in two parts, both delivered to reporters at the White House on Saturday. First, he ordered Zelenskyy to stop striking Russian oil refineries. "He better damn well stop," Trump said, his language leaving no room for negotiation. Second, and more destabilizing, he suggested Ukraine's president was the obstacle to peace. "Russia would like to make a deal," Trump told the press, "but for whatever reason, Zelenskyy does not want to make a deal." He claimed Putin had told him during a Friday phone call that Moscow wanted a settlement "strongly." No evidence was offered for Zelenskyy's alleged resistance. The accusation hung in the air anyway, reshaping the diplomatic landscape.
Zelenskyy had already reacted with fury to the fuel deal itself. He called it "terrible" and "not fair and not honest"—language that suggested not just disagreement but a sense of betrayal. The deal, struck between Trump and Putin, would ease Russia's economic isolation by allowing its oil products back into world markets. It was a concession that undercut the sanctions regime Ukraine had relied on to weaken Moscow's war machine. And it came as Russian forces were actively killing Ukrainian civilians. On the day Trump made his calls, Russian strikes killed twenty people, including three children.
But Trump's pressure did not stand alone. Within hours, the international response began to crystallize around Zelenskyy. Britain's Prime Minister Andy Burnham called his Ukrainian counterpart to offer what Downing Street described as "complete solidarity." In their conversation, Burnham acknowledged that the past day had been difficult for Ukraine and reaffirmed Britain's commitment to maintaining pressure on Russia. The two leaders agreed to meet in person within days. Germany, too, signaled it would not follow Trump's lead. Despite Moscow's new fuel agreement with Washington, Berlin said it would continue pushing for new European Union sanctions against Russia and would maintain its "unfailing" support for Ukraine's defense.
Ukraine's foreign minister, Andriy Sybiga, offered the most direct response to Trump's call for Zelenskyy's replacement. "He has the support of the Ukrainian people, and they have the right to decide," Sybiga said on Saturday. "Statements from abroad only confirm that he is doing his job well. He deserves support." The statement was measured but unmistakable: Ukraine's leadership was not America's to choose.
Meanwhile, the machinery of potential negotiation was already moving. American negotiators Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, who had been leading Trump's efforts to broker a Ukraine peace agreement, were reportedly preparing a visit to Moscow within the next two weeks, according to Russian state news. A Ukrainian delegation that had traveled to Miami for talks on ending the war was heading home on Saturday, an adviser to Zelenskyy confirmed. The talks had apparently yielded nothing that would justify staying.
In Moscow, Trump's call for Zelenskyy's removal was welcomed as a gift. Kirill Dmitriev, the Kremlin's special envoy on economic cooperation, posted on social media that Trump's remarks were "historic." He framed them as evidence that Trump understood Ukraine needed "leadership actually focused on peace"—a formulation that treated Zelenskyy's resistance to Russian demands as an obstacle rather than a defense of Ukrainian sovereignty.
Russia's military, for its part, continued its campaign against Ukrainian civilians and infrastructure. The defense ministry claimed its drones had struck a data-processing center in Kyiv used by Ukraine's armed forces and a cargo ship carrying military supplies to the port of Odesa. It also reported capturing two settlements in the Kharkiv region, though Reuters could not independently verify these claims. The war ground on, indifferent to the diplomatic turbulence above it.
Citas Notables
He has the support of the Ukrainian people, and they have the right to decide. Statements from abroad only confirm that he is doing his job well.— Andriy Sybiga, Ukraine's foreign minister
Russia would like to make a deal, but for whatever reason, Zelenskyy does not want to make a deal.— Donald Trump