In mid-March 2026, President Trump signed two executive orders addressing America's deepening housing affordability crisis — one targeting the regulatory layers that slow construction, the other loosening mortgage rules to invite more lenders into competition. The orders arrive as homeownership has drifted beyond reach for millions, with median home prices nearly five times the median household income. Beneath the policy mechanics lies an older tension: the desire to make homes accessible to those who do not yet own them, without diminishing the wealth of those who already do.
Breitbart News Network
· Mar 13, 2026
· economy
· 5 min read
High
Sourcing: Verified
Trump Signs Orders to Ease Housing Regulations and Mortgage Rules
◉
Politics & Governance
12434 related articles
Trump pushes Congress to pass Protect College Sports Act before recess
Fox News · 100% match
Trump voter regrets ballot after fiancée's ICE detention at airport
CBS News · 99% match
Milei's property bill sparks clashes as thousands protest in Buenos Ai…
Deutsche Welle · 99% match
Trump Signs New Orders Targeting Birthright Citizenship After Supreme …
Devdiscourse · 99% match
Trump Signs Executive Order Banning Trans Women From Women's Sports
NBC News · 99% match
Related Coverage
The Guardian · Aug 07
Australia grapples with smartglasses privacy risks as parliament returns; Sydney airport hit by staffing delays
Australia's Attorney General Michelle Rowland has written to the privacy commissioner expressing concerns that smartglas…
BBC News · Aug 07 PC Harper's investigator 'appalled' at killers' early release eligibilityThe senior investigator in PC Andrew Harper's 2019 death has publicly opposed early release for two of his killers, join…
The Guardian · Aug 07 Central Europe's heat crisis forces power plant shutdowns as records shatterCentral and eastern Europe experiences unprecedented heat waves with Slovakia reaching 42°C, forcing power plant shutdow…
BBC News · Aug 07 Taiwan's President Participates in Emergency Evacuation DrillTaiwan's President William Lai participated in a nighttime emergency evacuation drill as part of annual Han Kuang milita…
Bias & Framing
⚖
Article presents Trump's deregulatory housing orders as straightforward policy moves with bipartisan context, though timing emphasis and selective framing suggest favorable political positioning.
Bias Direction
center-right
Confidence
MED
Problem-solution framing that emphasizes regulatory burden as the primary housing affordability obstacle, while downplaying potential trade-offs or alternative explanations for housing costs (supply chain, labor, land value, zoning).
unnecessary regulatory barriers
onerous mandates
delayed construction
driven up the costs
made housing less affordable
Consumer protection advocates' concerns about reduced mortgage lending standards
Environmental or safety regulation justifications
Perspectives on whether deregulation alone addresses root causes (land scarcity, labor costs, materials)
Criticism of timing as election-motivated rather than policy-driven
Analysis of whether smaller banks have capacity/incentive to serve underserved communities
Counterarguments that housing costs are driven by factors beyond regulation
Geopolitical Impact
🌎
Domestic U.S. housing policy adjustment with minimal direct geopolitical implications; primarily electoral positioning ahead of midterms.
Escalation Risk
low
Confidence
HIGH
No significant international power shifts. Reflects internal U.S. political competition between parties on domestic economic issues.
Economic Lens
📈
Trump's executive orders reducing housing and mortgage regulations aim to boost construction and lending, potentially increasing housing supply and affordability by lowering compliance costs for builders and community banks.
Market Signal
bullish
Confidence
MED
Real Estate & Construction
Banking & Financial Services
Mortgage & Lending
Building Materials & Supply Chain
Homebuyers may benefit from increased housing supply and lower mortgage costs through expanded community bank lending. Construction workers could see increased employment. However, reduced regulations may affect consumer protections in lending practices.
Potential rollback of environmental, safety, and lending standards. May face legal challenges from consumer protection advocates. Could prompt state/local governments to adjust zoning and permitting processes. Senate bipartisan housing bill suggests broader legislative support for deregulation approach.