At the United Nations General Assembly, President Trump proposed replacing the term 'artificial intelligence' with 'Super Intelligence,' framing the linguistic shift as a reflection of the technology's true power rather than a mere semantic exercise. The moment arrives as global leaders and AI executives gather to debate safety frameworks, and as Trump prepares to host China's Xi Jinping in Washington — a meeting shadowed by deepening technological rivalry between the two superpowers. Trump's dismissal of safety regulations as a 'globalist scheme' places the United States at odds with an emerg
Trump Rebrands AI as 'Super Intelligence' Ahead of Xi Meeting
The word artificial makes intelligence sound fake. It's actually amazing.
Mark
So Trump is literally just renaming AI. Does that actually change anything about how the technology works or how it's regulated?
Mimi
Not the technology itself, no. But language shapes how people think about things, and Trump seems to believe calling it "Super Intelligence" instead of "artificial intelligence" makes it sound more powerful and less fake. It's a rhetorical move ahead of a crucial moment—he's meeting with Xi, and AI is one of the biggest competitive battlegrounds between the U.S. and China.
Luke
But here's what we don't know: whether this rebranding will actually move the needle with anyone who matters. The UN Security Council is hearing from Altman, Amodei, and Delangue about safety. Those are the people who actually build and deploy these systems. Does Trump's word choice change their calculus at all?
Mimi
Probably not directly. But it signals where the administration stands on regulation and speed. Trump has called slowdown warnings a hoax and a scam. That's a clear policy position, even if the rebranding itself is just marketing.
Mark
What about the companies themselves? OpenAI and Anthropic both just released cheaper models. Are they following Trump's lead, or are they just responding to market pressure?
Luke
The source says they're facing competition from cheaper open-weight competitors. So it's market-driven, not necessarily Trump-driven. But the timing is interesting—they're cutting prices and expanding model families while the administration is pushing for speed. It's hard to know if one caused the other.
Mimi
What's clear is that the companies are caught between two pressures: the market wants cheaper, more accessible AI, and the administration wants rapid development. Safety discussions at the UN are happening in a different lane entirely.
Mark
And China? Xi is coming to Washington. Is AI regulation going to be part of that conversation?
Luke
The source says AI has become one of the key talking points between the two superpowers. But we don't have details on what Trump plans to say or what Xi wants to discuss. That's the real story that's still unfolding.
Mimi
Right. The rebranding might be Trump's opening move—establishing that he sees AI as a strength, not a risk. But what Xi thinks about that, and what actually gets negotiated, we'll have to wait and see.
The Pulse
- Trump's call to rebrand AI as 'Super Intelligence' at the UN is not merely rhetorical — it signals an intention to define the terms of a global technological race on American soil and in American language.
- While Trump labels safety warnings a 'hoax,' OpenAI's Sam Altman and Anthropic's Dario Amodei were simultaneously addressing the UN Security Council on the urgent need for regulatory guardrails.
- The tension between acceleration and restraint is playing out in real time: markets surged on Trump's pro-development stance, pushing the Nasdaq to all-time highs even as safety advocates warn of unchecked risk.
- OpenAI and Anthropic each launched major model updates with steep price cuts on the same day, reflecting a fierce race to the bottom on cost even as the frontier of capability climbs higher.
- Trump's meeting with Xi Jinping later that day placed the rebranding effort in sharp geopolitical relief — a test of whether American narrative power carries weight in Beijing's calculus on AI competition.
At the United Nations General Assembly, President Trump proposed replacing the term 'artificial intelligence' with 'Super Intelligence,' framing the linguistic shift as a reflection of the technology's true power rather than a mere semantic exercise. The moment arrives as global leaders and AI executives gather to debate safety frameworks, and as Trump prepares to host China's Xi Jinping in Washington — a meeting shadowed by deepening technological rivalry between the two superpowers. Trump's dismissal of safety regulations as a 'globalist scheme' places the United States at odds with an emerging international consensus, raising the question of whether speed and sovereignty can substitute for caution in the shaping of transformative technology.
Standing at the United Nations General Assembly podium, President Trump made a case for linguistic reinvention. The word 'artificial,' he argued, makes the technology sound hollow and fake. What the world should call it instead is 'Super Intelligence' — a term he believes better captures the genuine power of systems reshaping commerce, defense, and daily life.
The timing was pointed. Even as Trump championed unfettered development, OpenAI's Sam Altman, Anthropic's Dario Amodei, and Hugging Face's Clément Delangue were scheduled to address the UN Security Council on safety guardrails and regulatory frameworks. The fundamental tension — how fast should these systems advance, and at what cost — was playing out in the same building, on the same day.
Trump has called warnings about AI's pace a 'hoax' and a 'scam,' framing caution as a globalist scheme designed to constrain American dominance. That conviction carried particular weight given that later Wednesday, he was set to receive China's President Xi Jinping in Washington, with AI competition already a central point of friction between the two superpowers.
Markets responded warmly. Technology stocks rallied Tuesday, pushing the Nasdaq to fresh all-time highs. Meanwhile, the companies themselves moved quickly: OpenAI launched two new tiers of its GPT-6 model family with a 50 percent price cut, while Anthropic released Claude Opus 5.5 the same day — both moves reflecting a race to the bottom on cost even as frontier capability pushes forward.
A change in nomenclature will not resolve whether AI should be built at maximum speed or with deliberate restraint. What it does reveal is Trump's intention to shape the narrative in American terms, on American timelines. Whether that framing carries any weight in Beijing remains the open question.
President Trump stood at the United Nations General Assembly podium and made a case for linguistic reinvention. The word "artificial," he argued, diminishes what artificial intelligence actually is. It makes the technology sound false, hollow, fake. What the world should be calling it instead is "Super Intelligence"—a term he believes better captures the genuine power of the systems reshaping global commerce, defense, and daily life.
This rebranding effort arrives at a peculiar moment in the technology's trajectory. While Trump champions unfettered development and speed, his counterparts across the globe are moving in the opposite direction. Sam Altman of OpenAI and Dario Amodei of Anthropic were scheduled to address the United Nations Security Council on Wednesday to discuss safety guardrails and regulatory frameworks for AI systems. They would be joined by Clément Delangue of Hugging Face. The conversation centers on a fundamental tension: how fast should these systems advance, and at what cost to safety?
Trump has been dismissive of calls for caution. He has labeled warnings about the pace of AI development a "hoax" and a "scam." His position reflects a broader conviction that slowdowns serve no one, that they represent a kind of globalist scheme designed to constrain American technological dominance. This stance carries particular weight given the timing. Later Wednesday, Trump was set to receive China's President Xi Jinping in Washington for a state visit, with AI competition between the two superpowers already a central point of friction.
The market has responded with optimism to Trump's pro-acceleration stance. Technology stocks rallied on Tuesday, pushing the Nasdaq to fresh all-time highs both intraday and at the close. Futures trading Wednesday morning remained broadly flat but positive, suggesting investors are comfortable with the direction of policy.
Meanwhile, the companies themselves are navigating the space between Trump's rhetoric and the practical demands of competition. OpenAI introduced two new tiers of its GPT-6 model family on Tuesday: GPT-6 Sol, designed for complex workloads like coding, and GPT-6 Luna, built for high-volume tasks such as document summarization and information extraction. Both came with a 50 percent price cut compared to the promotional pricing of GPT-5.6. Anthropic released Claude Opus 5.5 the same day, expanding its Claude 5.5 model family. Both moves represent a strategic response to cheaper, open-weight competitors flooding the market—a race to the bottom on cost even as the frontier of capability pushes forward.
The rebranding from AI to Super Intelligence is unlikely to settle the underlying debate. A change in nomenclature does not resolve whether the technology should be developed at maximum speed or with deliberate restraint. It does not bridge the gap between Trump's vision of unfettered innovation and the international consensus building around safety standards. What it does signal is the president's intention to shape the narrative around artificial intelligence in American terms, on American timelines, with American interests at the forefront. The meeting with Xi will test whether that framing holds any sway in Beijing.
Notable Quotes
The use of the word artificial makes intelligence fake. It is not fake. It's actually amazing.— President Donald Trump, at the UN General Assembly
Want the full story?
Read the original at CNBC ↗
Politics & Governance