Trump halts Yemen airstrikes as Houthis advance on strategic terrain

At least 125,000 people have been displaced since September, with Taiz city receiving up to 86,000 displaced Yemenis as fighting intensifies.
Bombs were being loaded when the order came to stop.
Trump reversed course on Yemen airstrikes at the last moment, despite initially ordering the Pentagon to prepare the operation.
Mark

So Trump literally had planes loaded and ready to go, and then just... stopped?

Mimi

That's what the New York Times is reporting. Bombs were being loaded, and then the order came to stand down. It happened after he'd already told the Pentagon to prepare the strikes in response to Saudi Arabia's crown prince calling him.

Mark

Why would he do that? What changed between the call and the moment the planes were ready?

Mimi

The reporting doesn't say explicitly. But Trump had been signaling for weeks that he didn't think the US should get involved. He told reporters the Houthis said they don't want to fight America, that ships are passing through fine. Then the crown prince calls, he agrees, then he reverses.

Luke

Right, and we should be clear: we don't have Trump's own explanation for why he changed his mind. The Times is reporting what happened, but his reasoning is still opaque. That matters.

Mimi

It does. What we do know is that 125,000 people have been displaced since September started, and the Houthis are moving toward terrain that would give them control of a major shipping route.

Mark

The Bab al-Mandab strait. That's the alternative route for oil if the Strait of Hormuz gets blocked?

Mimi

Exactly. Saudi Arabia has been using it as a backup. If the Houthis control the heights around it, they control the flow.

Luke

Though we should note: the Houthis have already said they're allowing ships to pass. Trump cited that. So the actual economic threat is still somewhat theoretical.

Mimi

Fair. But the Houthis could change that policy at any time. And strategically, controlling that terrain matters beyond just shipping.

Mark

So Trump's decision not to strike—does it help or hurt the US position with Saudi Arabia?

Mimi

It almost certainly hurts it. Saudi Arabia is already seeing the US as unreliable. This is the second time Trump has refused to commit to military support when asked.

Luke

And that matters because the whole US strategy in the Gulf depends on that alliance—the "security for oil" deal. If Saudi Arabia stops trusting America to back them up, that arrangement could fall apart.

Mark

So by trying to avoid getting dragged into Yemen, Trump might actually be destabilizing the entire regional structure?

Mimi

That's the risk analysts are pointing to. He's buying short-term flexibility at the cost of long-term credibility.

Luke

Though it's also worth saying: we don't know what Trump's private conversations with Saudi Arabia have been. The reporting shows what happened, but not necessarily what he's promised them behind closed doors.

  • Houthi forces are seizing mountain ranges and coastal terrain that would sever Saudi-backed supply lines and place a critical global shipping chokepoint within their reach.
  • At least 125,000 people have been displaced since early September, with Taiz city absorbing tens of thousands of civilians fleeing intensifying ground combat.
  • Trump agreed to strike, ordered the Pentagon to prepare, then reversed course entirely — leaving Saudi Arabia without the military support its crown prince had personally requested.
  • Saudi airstrikes have failed to slow the Houthi advance, and the Houthis claimed to have fired on Riyadh itself, with smoke reported near the capital's main airport.
  • Gulf allies are watching closely, and the perception of American unreliability now threatens the 'security for oil' compact that has anchored US regional strategy for decades.

As Houthi forces sweep toward the Bab al-Mandab strait — one of the arteries through which the world's energy flows — the United States stood at the threshold of intervention and stepped back. Donald Trump canceled airstrikes against the Iran-aligned group in September 2026, reversing a commitment made to Saudi Arabia's crown prince even as munitions were being prepared for loading. The episode illuminates a recurring tension in American power: the cost of acting and the cost of not acting are both real, and the choice to avoid one does not dissolve the other.

Bombs were already being loaded onto aircraft when the order came to stand down. Donald Trump had reversed himself again — canceling US airstrikes against Houthi fighters in Yemen just as the Pentagon was preparing to launch them. The decision followed a direct appeal from Saudi Arabia's crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman, who had asked for American military intervention to halt a rapid Houthi advance across Yemeni terrain.

The stakes of that advance are significant. Houthi forces are moving to seize strategic mountain ranges that would cut off supply lines to Saudi-backed Yemeni government forces and give them control over the Red Sea coast. More critically, they are pushing toward the Bab al-Mandab strait — a vital shipping chokepoint and an alternative route Saudi Arabia uses to move oil exports when the Strait of Hormuz faces disruption. The fighting has been fierce. Since early September, at least 125,000 people have been displaced, with Taiz city absorbing roughly 86,000 of them as ground battles concentrate in remote districts along the coast and inland highlands.

Trump's approach to Yemen has been inconsistent. Earlier this month he told reporters the Houthis had no desire to fight the United States, that ships were passing freely through the strait, and that the conflict was essentially Saudi Arabia's problem to manage. Yet when bin Salman called requesting direct support, Trump agreed and ordered strike preparations — before reversing himself entirely. Saudi Arabia has since launched hundreds of its own airstrikes against Houthi positions, but these have done little to slow the group's advance on the ground. The Houthis, meanwhile, claimed to have struck Riyadh itself.

The bind Trump faces is partly of his own making. He is reluctant to deepen American involvement in a conflict he views as unpopular, particularly with midterm elections approaching and a broader US-Israeli campaign against Iran having fallen short of its goals. Yet by declining to act when a close ally asked, he risks something more durable than a single military decision: the erosion of the foundational arrangement under which the United States provides a security umbrella to Gulf states in exchange for stable energy supplies. The Houthis continue to advance, and whether Washington will ultimately be drawn back in remains an open question.

Bombs were being loaded onto aircraft when the order came through to stop. Donald Trump had reversed himself again—this time calling off US airstrikes against Houthi fighters in Yemen just as the Pentagon was preparing to launch them, according to reporting by the New York Times. The decision came after Saudi Arabia's crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman, had made a direct appeal for American military intervention to halt what has become a rapid and destabilizing advance by the Iran-aligned group across Yemen's terrain.

The Houthis are moving to seize strategic mountain ranges that would give them control over the Red Sea coast and cut off supply lines to areas still held by Saudi-backed Yemeni government forces. More significantly, they are advancing toward the Bab al-Mandab strait, one of the world's most critical shipping chokepoints and an alternative route Saudi Arabia has relied on to move oil exports when the Strait of Hormuz faces disruption. The fighting has been intense and recent. Since early September, at least 125,000 people have been displaced by the escalating hostilities. Taiz city, where much of the ground combat has centered, has absorbed roughly 86,000 of those displaced Yemenis. The battles have focused on remote districts like Al-Wazi'iyah in Taiz province and Ras al-Ara along the Indian Ocean coast—terrain that, if secured by the Houthis, would allow them to consolidate control and open new fronts against their opponents.

Trump's handling of the Yemen question has been erratic. Earlier this month, during a visit to Ireland, he told reporters that the Houthis had contacted him and expressed no desire to fight the United States. He noted that the group was allowing ships to pass through the Bab al-Mandab strait and suggested the situation would resolve itself favorably. He characterized the Houthi problem as limited to Saudi Arabia's concerns, implying Riyadh should handle it alone. Yet when bin Salman called to request direct US military support, Trump initially agreed and instructed the Pentagon to prepare strikes. Then he changed course entirely, canceling the operation before it could proceed.

Saudi Arabia has launched hundreds of airstrikes in recent days against Houthi positions in the Kahboub mountains, but these have done little to slow the group's ground advance. The Yemeni president, Rashad al-Alimi, also reached out to Trump on Sunday, requesting military backing for his UN-recognized government. Trump made no firm commitment during that conversation, according to sources familiar with the call. The Houthis, meanwhile, claimed on Saturday that they had fired on Riyadh itself, with smoke visible near the main airport.

The dilemma Trump faces is genuine but self-created. He is under pressure from a close ally in Saudi Arabia to intervene militarily, yet he is also reluctant to deepen American involvement in what he views as an unpopular conflict. The US did conduct a two-month bombing campaign against the Houthis in early 2025, but Trump halted those strikes after negotiating a ceasefire with the group and has stayed out of the fighting since. A broader US-Israeli war against Iran has largely failed to achieve its objectives, and midterm elections are approaching—factors that appear to be weighing on the administration's calculus.

The administration's stated priority seems to be securing at least some flow of oil through the Strait of Hormuz while avoiding deeper entanglement in Yemen. But that strategy carries longer-term costs. Saudi Arabia and other Gulf allies increasingly view the United States as unreliable, a perception that threatens the foundational "security for oil" arrangement under which Washington provides a military umbrella to Gulf states in exchange for stable energy supplies. By refusing to act when asked, Trump may be preserving short-term flexibility while eroding the very alliance structure that underpins American strategy in the region. The Houthis continue their advance, and the question of whether the United States will ultimately be drawn back in remains unanswered.

The Houthis called us, and they don't want to fight us. They're allowing ships to pass the Bab al-Mandab strait and the situation will work out very well.
— Trump, speaking to reporters during a visit to Ireland
Contact Us FAQ