Thirlwall Inquiry reveals Letby's pattern of deception and callousness toward families

Fourteen infants were killed or nearly killed by Letby; families experienced devastating loss and trauma, with bereaved mothers describing how their thriving babies were taken in hours.
shockingly cold and unfeeling
Thirlwall's description of Letby's response to a bereaved mother who found her dead baby still in the incubator.
Mark

What does the Thirlwall Inquiry actually tell us that we didn't already know from the trial?

Mimi

The trial established that Letby killed and harmed these babies. The inquiry goes deeper into her character and behavior in the unit—how she lied to colleagues, ignored direct orders, and how callous she was to families. It also examines whether the hospital could have stopped her sooner.

Luke

But here's the thing: the inquiry wasn't examining her guilt. It was examining hospital procedures. So when we read about her lying or being cold to families, those are observations from the inquiry, but they're not new legal findings. They're character details.

Mimi

True, but they matter because they show a pattern. She didn't just harm babies—she actively deceived people around her about what happened. She lied about a father's reaction. She falsified medical records.

Mark

So the inquiry found that safeguarding failures allowed her to continue?

Mimi

Yes. Thirlwall concluded that some deaths could have been prevented if proper procedures had been followed. When Letby ignored a direct instruction to care for one baby and went to help with another instead, nothing happened to her.

Luke

But we should be careful here. The inquiry found procedures weren't followed. That's different from saying the hospital definitely could have stopped her. We don't know what would have happened if they had acted differently.

Mark

What about the families? How are they responding to this inquiry?

Mimi

The inquiry includes their testimony. One mother described having two thriving boys and then losing them both in hours. Another mother called Letby's response to finding her dead baby in the incubator "shockingly cold and unfeeling."

Luke

Those are powerful statements, but they're also deeply painful. The families are grieving and angry. That's understandable, but it's also their perspective on events.

Mark

Where does this leave Letby legally?

Mimi

She's serving fifteen whole-life sentences. She's appealed twice and been denied both times. The Criminal Cases Review Commission is looking at claims from medical experts that natural causes or poor care, not deliberate harm, caused the babies to collapse.

Luke

That's the crucial thing to watch. The CCRC is independent. If they find evidence of a potential miscarriage of justice, that changes everything. Right now, Letby is convicted and the inquiry confirms the hospital failed. But the CCRC process is still open.

  • Fourteen infants were killed or nearly killed in a neonatal unit that should have been among the safest places on earth, and the Thirlwall Inquiry has now confirmed that some of those deaths were preventable had safeguarding procedures been followed.
  • Letby was found to have fabricated accounts of bereaved parents' behavior, falsified medical records to conceal infant distress, and responded to a grieving mother's anguish with words the inquiry called 'shockingly cold and unfeeling.'
  • She repeatedly ignored direct management instructions — inserting herself into the care of babies she had been told to leave alone — and faced no meaningful consequence, a pattern the inquiry documents as a systemic failure of oversight.
  • Letby maintains her innocence, has twice been denied appeal, and the Criminal Cases Review Commission is now weighing claims from international medical experts that natural causes, not deliberate harm, explain the collapses — keeping the case in contested legal territory.
  • Supporters gathered outside Liverpool Town Hall before the inquiry's findings were released, a visible reminder that public trust in the verdict remains fractured even as the inquiry's portrait of Letby grows more damning.

Between 2015 and 2016, neonatal nurse Lucy Letby moved through a British hospital's most vulnerable ward, and the Thirlwall Inquiry has now illuminated not merely the crimes for which she was convicted, but the character she carried while committing them — a character marked by deception, defiance of authority, and a striking indifference to the grief she left behind. The inquiry's deeper finding is institutional as much as personal: that systems designed to protect the smallest lives failed to act on warnings that, in retrospect, carried the weight of prophecy. In the long human story of institutional accountability, this inquiry asks how much suffering might be averted if those entrusted with oversight chose vigilance over comfort.

Lucy Letby, now 36, is serving fifteen whole-life sentences for murdering seven babies and attempting to murder seven others at the Countess of Chester Hospital between 2015 and 2016. The Thirlwall Inquiry, published this week, was not convened to relitigate her guilt but to examine whether the hospital's response to concerns about her could have saved lives. Its conclusion was unsparing: some deaths could have been prevented had proper safeguarding procedures been followed.

Beyond the institutional failures, the inquiry reconstructed Letby's conduct in the unit with uncomfortable precision. After one infant's death, she was observed making a memory box for the parents — a task she had been explicitly told not to do — repeatedly abandoning her assigned patient to involve herself with the deceased child's family. Management took no action. The inquiry found she ignored instructions whenever she disagreed with them and had shouted at her manager.

Thirlwall found Letby 'repeatedly untruthful' with colleagues. In one documented case, she sent a message to a colleague describing a father's anguished reaction at the mortuary — an account the baby's mother told the inquiry had never occurred. Thirlwall agreed it was attention-seeking and constituted a red flag.

The inquiry's most striking passages concern her coldness toward grieving families. When a mother whose baby had died asked Letby why her child was still in the incubator, Letby replied: 'You haven't told us to take him.' Thirlwall called the remark shockingly cold. The same mother had described possessing two thriving boys before, within hours, everything was taken from her. Letby also falsified that infant's medical record, erasing documented distress and the mother's own visit to the unit.

Letby's nursing history was uneven — early assessments flagged gaps in communication and enthusiasm, though she later qualified in 2011. She has twice been denied appeal and continues to assert her innocence. The Criminal Cases Review Commission is currently examining evidence from international medical experts who argue natural causes explain the babies' collapses, leaving the case suspended between legal finality and unresolved public doubt.

Lucy Letby, now 36, is serving fifteen whole-life prison sentences after being convicted of murdering seven babies and attempting to murder seven others at the Countess of Chester Hospital's neonatal unit between 2015 and 2016. She remains Britain's most prolific child killer in legal history. A public inquiry led by Lady Justice Thirlwall, published this week, has now documented in granular detail not just what Letby did, but who she was while doing it—a portrait of deception, insubordination, and a coldness toward the families whose children died in her care.

The inquiry was not tasked with determining Letby's guilt; she has already been convicted and maintains her innocence. Instead, Thirlwall examined how the hospital handled concerns about the neonatal nurse and whether earlier intervention could have stopped her. The investigation concluded that some of the deaths and near-deaths could have been prevented had proper safeguarding procedures been followed. But the report also reconstructs Letby's behavior in the unit with uncomfortable specificity, drawing on testimony from colleagues, families, and her own documented actions.

One incident illustrates her pattern of disregarding instruction. After Baby C died, Letby was observed helping to make a memory box for the infant's parents—a task she had not been assigned and was actively told not to do. Baby C's mother told the inquiry that Letby had been directed to care for a different child but repeatedly abandoned that assignment to involve herself with Baby C. Thirlwall noted that management took no action when Letby ignored these directions. The pattern extended beyond this single case: Letby ignored management instructions when she disagreed with them and had shouted at her manager.

Thirlwall found Letby was "repeatedly untruthful in her dealings with friends and colleagues." One documented instance involved a message Letby sent to a colleague after Baby A's death. She wrote that the father had been found on the floor crying, pleading not to have his baby taken away when Letby brought the body to the mortuary. The mother of Baby A and Baby B—the latter of whom Letby attempted to murder—told the inquiry this account was false and never occurred. Thirlwall agreed with the mother's assessment that the message was "attention seeking" and constituted a "red flag."

The inquiry also documented Letby's callousness toward bereaved families. When the mother of Baby E, whom Letby murdered, and Baby F, whom she attempted to kill, found her dead baby still in the incubator and asked Letby why, Letby responded: "You haven't told us to take him." Thirlwall described this remark to a grieving mother as "shockingly cold and unfeeling." The mother had told the inquiry that she had possessed "two thriving little boys" but that "in the space of a couple of hours it had all been taken." Letby also falsified Baby E's medical record, omitting the infant's distress, blood from the baby's mouth, and the mother's visit to the unit. In another case, Baby J was found covered in their own faeces while in Letby's care, prompting a formal complaint from the parents.

Letby's professional history showed mixed performance. Early assessments during her nursing training identified gaps in enthusiasm, communication with families, and drug calculations. By her second and third years, one nurse described her as "one of the best students she had mentored." But during her final placement, significant concerns emerged. The deputy ward manager noted that Letby was "quiet, withdrawn and struggled to build relationships with children, families and colleagues." She failed a mid-year assessment and an observed structured clinical examination, though she later passed the examination and qualified as a registered children's nurse in 2011.

Letby, from Hereford, has twice been denied permission to appeal her convictions in 2024 and continues to maintain her innocence. The Criminal Cases Review Commission, which investigates potential miscarriages of justice, is currently examining evidence presented on her behalf by an international panel of medical experts who argue that poor medical care and natural causes, rather than deliberate harm, explain the babies' collapses. Before Thirlwall delivered her findings, supporters of Letby gathered outside Liverpool Town Hall calling for her release.

repeatedly untruthful in her dealings with friends and colleagues" and "her inappropriate and callous nature was noted by patients and colleagues
— Lady Justice Thirlwall, Thirlwall Inquiry report
in the space of a couple of hours it had all been taken
— Mother of Baby E and Baby F, testimony to the inquiry
Contact Us FAQ