Taliban Face Growing Insurgent Pressure Five Years After Return to Power

At least 372 Afghan civilians killed and nearly 400 injured in cross-border hostilities during first three months of 2026; multiple high-profile attacks by insurgents and IS have claimed Taliban officials and civilians.
The ground will be prepared for proxy wars
A former Afghan defense minister warns that Taliban repression could invite regional interference and armed conflict.
Mark

The Taliban lost a district center for the first time in five years. How significant is that, really?

Mimi

It's significant because it breaks a narrative. The Taliban's entire claim to legitimacy rests on security. They say: we can do what the previous government couldn't. A district changing hands, even briefly, says that claim is hollow.

Mark

But they retook it quickly. Does that matter?

Mimi

It does and it doesn't. Yes, they retook it. But the fact that it was lost at all means armed groups now know it's possible. That changes the psychology of resistance.

Mark

Who are these armed groups? Are they unified?

Mimi

No. You have former military commanders like Sami Sadat operating from America. You have the National Resistance Front, which has been fighting since 2021. You have the Islamic State's regional branch. They're not coordinated, but they're all pushing on the same weak points.

Mark

And Pakistan? The Taliban blame Pakistan for supporting insurgents.

Mimi

Pakistan says the opposite—that the Taliban harbor Pakistani militants. Both accusations probably contain truth. What's clear is that the border has become a conduit for support flowing to whoever opposes the Taliban.

Mark

So this could become a proxy war?

Mimi

Experts are warning exactly that. If the Taliban don't change their governing approach—the repression, the human rights abuses—the ground becomes fertile for external powers to back insurgencies. That's when Afghanistan becomes a chessboard again.

  • For the first time since 2021, Taliban fighters lost control of a district center — a brief but symbolically devastating crack in the regime's core promise of unbreakable security.
  • Exiled former Afghan army general Sami Sadat announced coordinated military operations against the Taliban from the United States, signaling that armed resistance is becoming organized and internationally connected.
  • Cross-border hostilities between Afghanistan and Pakistan killed at least 372 Afghan civilians in just the first three months of 2026, with each government accusing the other of sheltering militant enemies.
  • The Islamic State continues to strike inside Afghanistan, killing a Taliban minister and foreign nationals in Kabul, proving the regime faces threats it cannot frame as mere foreign interference.
  • Experts warn that the Taliban's repressive governance — banning women from public life, crushing political opposition — is actively generating the insurgency it claims to be suppressing, potentially inviting deeper regional entanglement.

Five years after seizing Kabul, the Taliban confront what every governing power eventually must: the gap between the order they promised and the order they can sustain. A briefly lost district in Badakhshan, a general's declaration of war from American soil, and 372 civilians killed in cross-border clashes with Pakistan together form a portrait of a regime whose founding claim — that it alone could deliver security — is being tested from every direction. History reminds us that legitimacy built on a single pillar is fragile, and Afghanistan, so often the arena where regional ambitions are settled by proxy, may be entering another such chapter.

On the eve of their fifth anniversary in power, the Taliban experienced something they had not faced since returning to Kabul in August 2021: losing a district center. The capital of Yaftal-e Payeen in Badakhshan province slipped from their hands briefly in mid-August 2026, but the symbolic damage outlasted the military setback. For five years, the Taliban's claim to legitimacy had rested almost entirely on their ability to provide security where the previous government had failed. A changing of hands — even temporary — suggested that claim was beginning to fray.

The Badakhshan episode was not isolated. Internal fighting among Taliban fighters and assassinations of senior officials had already been reported in the province. Then, two weeks after the district fell, former Afghan army general Sami Sadat announced from the United States that he had ordered military operations against the Taliban nationwide. The National Resistance Front, led by Ahmad Shah Massoud's son, had been fighting since 2021, and other factions had since emerged. None posed an existential threat, but observers began asking whether a threshold had been crossed. As former Interior Minister Mohammad Umer Daudzai told Deutsche Welle, both the political and military forms of opposition had now taken shape simultaneously.

The Taliban's governing record has done little to broaden their base. Women remain barred from work and education beyond sixth grade. Most former officials live in exile. Internationally, only Russia has granted the regime formal recognition. Experts warn that this combination of repression and isolation is not suppressing resistance — it is cultivating it. Former Acting Defense Minister Shahmohammad Miakhel put it plainly: continued Taliban policy would generate armed opposition, invite neighbor interference, and ultimately prepare the ground for proxy war.

That proxy dynamic is already visible along the Pakistani border. Once close allies, Afghanistan and Pakistan have descended into open hostility. A United Nations report documented at least 372 Afghan civilian deaths and nearly 400 injuries from cross-border clashes in just the first quarter of 2026. The Taliban accuse Pakistan of sheltering insurgent groups; Pakistan accuses the Taliban of harboring the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan, which has carried out attacks on Pakistani soil. Neither side has offered conclusive evidence for its claims, but the pattern of mutual accusation and cross-border violence is itself telling.

Former defense ministry spokesperson Mohammad Radmanish suggested that Sadat's announcement from America was not spontaneous — that no armed group in Afghanistan operates without foreign backing. Whether Pakistan is directly coordinating with Afghan resistance factions remains disputed, but the broader picture is coming into focus. Five years after their return, the Taliban are governing a country that is beginning to resemble a proxy battleground — one where exiled commanders, regional powers, and transnational militant groups are all, in their own ways, testing how long the Taliban can hold what they have taken.

Five years to the day before the Taliban's August 15 anniversary of returning to power in Afghanistan, the regime faced a moment it had not experienced since 2021: the loss of a district center. The Yaftal-e Payeen capital in Badakhshan province, in the country's northeast, slipped from Taliban control in mid-August 2026. The disruption was brief, but its symbolic weight was not. For five years, the Taliban had staked their legitimacy on a single claim—that they could deliver security where the previous government could not. A district center changing hands, even temporarily, suggested that claim was fraying.

The loss came amid other signs of strain. Reports from Badakhshan described internal fighting among Taliban fighters and assassinations of high-ranking Taliban officials. Two weeks after the district fell, former Afghan army general Sami Sadat, speaking from the United States where he has lived since the Taliban takeover, released a video announcing that he had ordered military operations against the Taliban across the country. Sadat's move was not isolated. The National Resistance Front, led by the son of the late commander Ahmad Shah Massoud, had been waging armed struggle since 2021. Other factions had emerged as well. None had yet posed an existential threat to Taliban rule, but experts began asking whether the Badakhshan clashes might signal a turning point. "In these five years, this opposition existed in two forms: political and military," former Afghan Interior Minister Mohammad Umer Daudzai told Deutsche Welle. "As the five-year mark approaches, both forms of opposition have taken shape."

The Taliban's grip on power rests on a foundation that is narrowing. Since taking control in August 2021, they have ruled with severity. Women have been barred from work and education beyond sixth grade, and are largely confined from public life. Basic human rights protections have been stripped away. Most former government officials are in exile. The Taliban insist that all Afghans are free to return and live ordinary lives, but opponents counter that return is meaningless without the right to political activity. Internationally, the regime remains isolated—only Russia has recognized the Taliban as Afghanistan's legitimate government. Facing pressure from within and without, the Taliban have repeatedly pointed to restored security as their primary justification for rule. Yet experts warn that their governing approach may be doing the opposite. "If this policy of the Taliban continues, armed forces will emerge against them, opposition will emerge, interference from neighbors will arise, and ultimately the ground will be prepared for proxy wars," former Acting Minister of Defense Shahmohammad Miakhel told DW.

Beyond political opposition, the Islamic State's regional branch remains active in Afghanistan. In January, an explosion at a Chinese restaurant in central Kabul killed at least seven people. In December 2024, a suicide bombing in the capital killed the Taliban's Minister of Refugees, Khalil Ur-Rahman Haqqani. These attacks have demonstrated that the Taliban face threats not just from Afghan resistance groups but from transnational militant organizations.

The most consequential challenge to Taliban control may come from across the border. Afghanistan and Pakistan, once close allies of the Taliban, have descended into open hostility since 2021. The tension erupted into full clashes in 2026. According to a United Nations report from May, cross-border fighting during the first three months of 2026 killed at least 372 Afghan civilians and injured nearly 400 more. The Taliban accuse Pakistan of supporting insurgent groups and providing them refuge. Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid told DW that hostile elements had been invited to Islamabad and were now seeking offices and safe havens there. When asked for evidence, Mujahid provided none.

Pakistan tells a different story. The country accuses the Taliban of harboring the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan, a militant group that has carried out attacks on Pakistani soil. Pakistan denies supporting Afghan insurgents and instead claims it is targeting Taliban military sites and hideouts used by militant groups. "Islamabad has used all its options, including regional diplomacy and direct communication, but nothing has been honored," security expert Qamar Cheema told DW in February. "As a neighboring Muslim country, Pakistan appears to inflict damage in an attempt to alter Taliban behavior."

Former defense ministry spokesperson Mohammad Radmanish suggested that the timing of Sadat's announcement from America was itself revealing. "When Mr. Sami Sadat issues such an order from America to those who must fight the Taliban, he has certainly seen a green light," Radmanish told DW. "In Afghanistan, no group and no one can carry out any activity without the support of one or more foreign countries." The implication was clear: the insurgency was not spontaneous but orchestrated by external powers. Whether Pakistan is directly coordinating with Afghan resistance groups remains disputed, but the pattern is unmistakable. Five years after the Taliban's return, Afghanistan is beginning to look like a stage for proxy conflict—a place where neighboring powers, exiled Afghan factions, and transnational militant groups are testing the Taliban's ability to hold what they have taken.

In these five years, this opposition existed in two forms: political and military. As the five-year mark approaches, both forms of opposition have taken shape.
— Mohammad Umer Daudzai, former Afghan Interior Minister
If this policy of the Taliban continues, armed forces will emerge against them, opposition will emerge, interference from neighbors will arise, and ultimately the ground will be prepared for proxy wars.
— Shahmohammad Miakhel, former Acting Minister of Defense
Contact Us FAQ