Study reveals gender, racial disparities in dementia risk for people over 90

We can't assume someone from a high-risk group is in the clear at 90
A researcher explains why reaching advanced age without dementia doesn't mean the danger has passed.
Mark

Why does it matter that we're only now studying dementia in people over 90? Didn't we already know how the brain ages?

Mimi

We knew patterns in people 65 and older, but the brain at 90 is a different organism. The oldest-old are a growing population, and we had almost no data specific to them. That's a blind spot we can't afford.

Mark

The gender gap is striking—women twice as likely to develop dementia. Is that biological, or does it reflect something about how women live longer?

Mimi

That's the question researchers are asking. The pattern shows up consistently across age groups, so it's not just survival bias. But whether it's hormonal, genetic, or tied to accumulated exposures over a longer lifetime—that's still unclear.

Mark

The racial disparities are sobering. Black participants had 75 percent higher risk than Asian participants. What explains that?

Mimi

The study doesn't answer that directly. It documents the disparity, which is crucial. But the causes likely run deep—access to healthcare earlier in life, stress, diet, education, environmental exposures. This is a window into systemic inequality showing up in the brain.

Mark

The APOE4 gene doubled risk for Black participants but not for the overall group. How do you interpret that?

Mimi

It suggests the gene doesn't work in isolation. Its effect depends on who carries it—their gender, their ancestry, probably their life history. That's why personalized medicine matters. A genetic risk factor means something different depending on the person.

Mark

Some people with APOE4 and other risk factors stayed sharp into their 90s. What kept them safe?

Mimi

That's the mystery the researchers want to solve next. There's something—resilience, protective factors, maybe things they did in their 60s and 70s—that buffered them. If we can identify it, we might be able to help others.

Mark

What should a doctor do with this information?

Mimi

Stop assuming that reaching 90 without dementia means you're safe. Instead, have a conversation about risk with every patient, especially those in high-risk groups. Prevention and monitoring matter even at the very end of life.

  • A knowledge vacuum around dementia in the very old is becoming urgent as demographic projections place 230 million people over 90 by 2100, yet medicine has operated largely on assumption rather than evidence.
  • Women over 90 face twice the dementia risk of men, and Black participants carry a 75% greater risk than Asian participants — disparities that mirror younger populations and refuse to fade with age.
  • The APOE4 gene, long associated with Alzheimer's, tells a fractured story: largely neutral for the full cohort, it doubles risk specifically among Black participants and elevates it among men, demanding disaggregated analysis rather than broad conclusions.
  • The APOE2 variant offers a striking counterpoint, reducing dementia risk by 60% even past age 90, and some APOE4 carriers and high-risk individuals remained cognitively sharp — raising urgent questions about what biological or behavioral factors confer protection.
  • Clinicians are being urged to abandon the assumption that surviving to 90 dementia-free signals safety, and instead to treat it as a moment for intensified, risk-stratified prevention conversations.

As the global population of nonagenarians swells toward an estimated 230 million by century's end, a UC Davis and Kaiser Permanente study offers the first substantial evidence that the inequalities shaping dementia risk in middle age do not dissolve with extreme longevity — they endure. Tracking over 800 diverse adults aged 90 and older since 2018, researchers found that women, Black participants, and Hispanic participants carry disproportionately higher dementia burdens even in the tenth decade of life, while a single gene variant can either halve or double one's risk depending on gender and ethnicity. The findings remind us that reaching 90 without cognitive decline is not an arrival at safety, but a threshold that demands renewed and personalized vigilance.

For generations, cognitive decline past 90 was treated as an inevitability rather than a subject of serious inquiry — partly because nonagenarians were rare enough that the knowledge gap seemed manageable. That calculus is changing fast. With demographers projecting some 230 million people worldwide will be 90 or older by 2100, a UC Davis Health and Kaiser Permanente team launched the LifeAfter90 study in 2018 to begin filling the void. Enrolling adults before any signs of dementia appeared, and examining them every six months, the researchers drew on decades of Kaiser medical records — some dating to the 1960s — to build an unusually rich picture of cognitive aging in a diverse cohort. Their findings, published in The Lancet Healthy Longevity, drew on data from over 800 participants with a median age of 92.

What emerged was both familiar and newly sobering. Women over 90 faced twice the dementia risk of men. Black participants showed a 75% greater risk than Asian participants, and Hispanic participants had significantly higher rates than white and Asian peers. First author Hilary Colbeth noted the striking persistence of these disparities into the tenth decade, while senior author Rachel Whitmer observed that although women in their 60s and 70s were known to face elevated risk, no one had confirmed whether the pattern held this late in life — until now.

The study also probed the role of the APOE gene. The protective APOE2 variant retained its power past 90, cutting dementia risk by 60%. APOE4, by contrast, told a more complicated story: across the full cohort its effect was modest, but disaggregated by gender and ethnicity, it doubled risk among Black participants and elevated it among men. Meanwhile, some individuals carrying APOE4 — and others with histories of high blood pressure and cholesterol — remained cognitively intact into their 90s, a puzzle the team hopes to unravel in search of replicable protective mechanisms.

Whitmer's message to clinicians was direct: reaching 90 without dementia is not a signal to stand down. Certain groups remain at meaningfully higher risk, and the conversation about prevention should intensify rather than cease. As the population of the very old grows, that reframing — from longevity as arrival to longevity as ongoing responsibility — may prove one of medicine's most consequential shifts.

For decades, researchers have assumed that cognitive decline after age 90 was simply inevitable—a natural consequence of extreme longevity. But until very recently, they had almost no hard data to prove it. The knowledge gap mattered less when ninety-year-olds were rare. By 2100, that will no longer be true. Demographers project roughly 230 million people worldwide will be 90 or older, and doctors, scientists, and policymakers are scrambling to understand how to care for them.

A team at UC Davis Health and Kaiser Permanente has begun filling that void. Since 2018, they have been running the LifeAfter90 study, tracking a large cohort of people 90 and older who enrolled before showing any signs of dementia. Every six months, researchers examined these patients to monitor their cognitive health. Because the participants were long-term Kaiser Permanente members, the team had access to decades of medical history—some records stretching back to the 1960s. When the researchers published their latest findings in The Lancet Healthy Longevity, they had examined medical records from over 800 participants with a median age of 92. This was the first major effort to investigate dementia patterns in a highly diverse group of people in their tenth decade.

What they found echoed patterns seen in younger populations, but with new urgency. Women 90 and older faced a dementia risk twice as high as men. Racial and ethnic disparities persisted too: Black participants showed a 75 percent greater risk than Asian participants. Hispanic participants also had significantly higher incidence rates than white and Asian participants. "It is striking that the racial and ethnic disparities in dementia risk observed in younger adults continue into the tenth decade of life," said Hilary Colbeth, a UC Davis postdoctoral scholar and first author on the paper. Rachel Whitmer, the study's senior author and a UC Davis professor of public health sciences and neurology, noted that researchers had long known women in their 60s and 70s faced higher dementia risk, but no one had confirmed whether that pattern held after 90.

The study also examined how a single gene shaped dementia risk in this age group. The APOE gene has long been linked to Alzheimer's disease. One variant, APOE2, acts as a shield, lowering the risk of developing Alzheimer's. Another variant, APOE4, does the opposite. The researchers found that APOE2's protective effects remained powerful past age 90, reducing dementia risk by 60 percent. APOE4 told a more complicated story. For the study group as a whole, it did not substantially increase dementia incidence. But when the researchers broke down the data by gender and ethnicity, a different picture emerged. APOE4 increased risk among men. More strikingly, it essentially doubled the risk among Black participants.

These findings raise as many questions as they answer. Some participants had high blood pressure, high cholesterol, and other known dementia risk factors in their 60s and 70s, yet remained cognitively sharp into their 90s. The same was true for some people carrying the APOE4 variant. The researchers want to understand what protected these individuals—what biological or behavioral factors allowed them to escape the expected trajectory. If those mechanisms could be identified and replicated, they might offer a path toward prevention.

For now, Whitmer emphasized a more immediate lesson for clinicians. "Doctors need to know that certain groups are at higher or lower risk," she said. "We can't just assume that someone from a high-risk group makes it to 90 without dementia and they're in the clear. We need to talk about risk reduction for everyone." The findings suggest that reaching 90 without dementia is not a guarantee of safety. It is a moment to intensify attention, not to relax it. As the population of the very old grows, that distinction could reshape how medicine approaches the final decades of life.

It is striking that the racial and ethnic disparities in dementia risk observed in younger adults continue into the tenth decade of life.
— Hilary Colbeth, UC Davis postdoctoral scholar and first author
Doctors need to know that certain groups are at higher or lower risk. We can't just assume that someone from a high-risk group makes it to 90 without dementia and they're in the clear.
— Rachel Whitmer, UC Davis Health professor and study senior author
Contact Us FAQ