Stop the Lie: Final Fantasy VII Rebirth Demands Prior Games

Rebirth is unapologetically the middle of an ongoing story
The game's narrative structure makes it impossible for newcomers to understand without prior knowledge of Remake and the original Final Fantasy VII.
Mark

Why does Square Enix keep saying Rebirth is accessible to newcomers when it clearly isn't?

Mimi

Because admitting otherwise might cost them sales. If you tell someone they need to play a 40-hour game before buying your 40-hour game, some will walk away. The math is simpler if you just say everyone can jump in.

Mark

But doesn't that backfire when people actually play it?

Mimi

It does, but by then the purchase is made. The company gets its opening-week numbers. The player's frustration comes later, after the earnings call.

Mark

Is this unique to Final Fantasy, or is it industry-wide?

Mimi

It's everywhere. Mass Effect, Dragon Age, Assassin's Creed—they all do it. Developers design sequels that theoretically work standalone, which means nothing gets the full weight it deserves. Characters disappear. Choices feel hollow. The story becomes a compromise.

Mark

What's the alternative? Should sequels just accept they'll alienate newcomers?

Mimi

Yes, actually. Or at least be honest about it. A sequel that embraces what it is—a continuation—can tell a better story than one constantly hedging its bets on hypothetical new players who might never arrive.

Mark

But people do want to jump into series mid-way sometimes.

Mimi

They do, and that's fine. But they should know what they're getting into. The lie isn't that sequels exist—it's pretending they don't require context when they clearly do.

  • Square Enix's co-director publicly assured newcomers that Rebirth was accessible without Remake — a claim the game itself immediately and thoroughly contradicts.
  • Players who took the studio at its word found themselves mid-conversation in a decades-long narrative, armed only with a recap menu against thirty years of lore.
  • This is not an isolated failure — Mass Effect, Dragon Age, and Assassin's Creed have all marketed sequels as entry points while quietly depending on the emotional and narrative scaffolding of prior games.
  • The business logic is clear: studios fear that admitting a $70 game requires prior investment will cost them buyers, but the compromise hollows out the storytelling for everyone.
  • The industry is being called to stop treating narrative continuity as a liability to be hidden, and to trust that audiences can — and should — meet a story at its beginning.

In the long tradition of storytelling, sequels have always carried the weight of what came before — yet the games industry continues to insist otherwise, driven by market anxiety rather than narrative honesty. Square Enix's claim that Final Fantasy VII Rebirth can be enjoyed without its predecessor, Remake, represents a familiar and telling gap between commercial messaging and artistic reality. The game is, unapologetically, the middle chapter of an unfinished trilogy, and no recap menu can substitute for the experience of having lived through its beginning. This moment invites a broader reckoning: when industries fear the depth of their own stories, they risk diminishing the very thing that makes those stories worth telling.

Square Enix co-director Motomu Toriyama assured players that Final Fantasy VII Rebirth could be fully enjoyed without first playing Remake. After finishing the game, that assurance looks like a spectacular miscalculation. Rebirth is the second chapter of a planned trilogy, built on the direct foundation of its predecessor and saturated with nearly thirty years of Final Fantasy VII history. The studio's promised "preparations" for newcomers amount to a recap menu — a thin bridge over a very wide river.

This pattern is well-worn in gaming. BioWare made similar claims about Mass Effect 3, building dialogue variations for players without prior save data, yet the game remained structurally dependent on choices made across two earlier titles. Dragon Age presents itself as an anthology while leaving threads unresolved between entries. Assassin's Creed cycles through new protagonists but maintains a fractured present-day storyline that leaves both newcomers and veterans feeling shortchanged. The business logic is consistent: studios fear that admitting a sequel requires prior investment will shrink their potential audience. The consequence is equally consistent — storytelling shaped not by what the narrative needs, but by what marketing believes a first-time player can tolerate.

What makes Rebirth's case particularly sharp is that the game itself doesn't pretend to be something it isn't. Its design is openly, confidently a continuation. The dishonesty lives in the gap between what Square Enix says publicly and what the game actually demands — and that gap erodes trust. Remake was itself marketed as a modernised retelling of a classic, only to reveal itself as a narrative remix that left newcomers bewildered at its ending. Now those same newcomers are being told the sequel requires no homework.

The industry's anxiety around long continuities is understandable. Kingdom Hearts and The Legend of Heroes have both lost potential players unwilling to commit the time and money required to catch up. But the answer to that anxiety is not to misrepresent what a sequel is. Sequels are extensions of prior work — they build on established worlds, characters, and consequences. Pretending otherwise doesn't democratise storytelling; it diminishes it. The industry needs to stop treating continuity as a problem worth hiding, and trust that a story experienced whole is worth more than one quietly hollowed out to seem approachable.

Square Enix has a problem with the truth. When asked whether players could enjoy Final Fantasy VII Rebirth without first playing Remake, co-director Motomu Toriyama gave a definitive answer: yes, the studio had made preparations so newcomers could have a complete experience. After finishing the game, that claim reads like a spectacular lie.

Rebirth is not a standalone entry point. It is the second installment of a three-game story, structured as an unbroken narrative that demands you know what came before. The "preparations" Square Enix mentions amount to a recap menu—insufficient for understanding a game that builds directly on Remake's events and assumes familiarity with nearly three decades of Final Fantasy VII lore. To play Rebirth cold is to walk into the middle of a conversation and pretend you've been there from the start.

This isn't a new problem in gaming. The pattern repeats across franchises: developers claim their sequels are accessible entry points, marketing teams amplify the message, and players who take the bait end up confused and frustrated. BioWare did this with Mass Effect 3, even building dialogue variations for players without imported saves from earlier games, yet the third game still felt structurally dependent on choices made in the first two. Dragon Age positions itself as an anthology while leaving narrative threads dangling between entries. Assassin's Creed cycles through protagonists and settings but maintains a present-day storyline so fractured that characters disappear without resolution, leaving newcomers and veterans alike feeling shortchanged.

The business logic is transparent: companies fear telling potential buyers that their new game requires dozens of hours of prior investment. A $70 purchase feels less appealing when you learn it demands catching up on previous titles. But this fear has consequences. When developers design sequels to theoretically work as standalone products, they water down the storytelling. Characters and plot threads get underserved because the game must operate under the assumption that some players may not know they exist. Consequences feel hollow. Payoffs feel muted. The narrative becomes a lowest-common-denominator version of itself, shaped not by what the story needs but by what marketing thinks new players can tolerate.

Final Fantasy VII Rebirth is unapologetic about what it is—a continuation of a meta-narrative spanning nearly thirty years. The game doesn't pretend otherwise in its actual design. But Square Enix's public statements do, and that gap between what the company says and what the game actually demands creates a betrayal of trust. Remake itself was marketed as a modernized retelling of the classic PlayStation RPG, and when it turned out to be something else entirely—a narrative remix that plays with player expectations—newcomers reached its ending bewildered. Now they're being told the sequel needs no prior reading.

The industry's obsession with making every sequel an entry point stems from a legitimate market anxiety: long continuities can feel intimidating. Kingdom Hearts and The Legend of Heroes have both faced dismissal from potential players unwilling to invest the time and money required to catch up. That hesitation is fair. Video games demand more from consumers than most media—dozens of hours, significant expense, sustained attention. Watching Dune: Part Two requires one night of viewing. Playing through Remake takes substantially longer.

But the solution isn't to lie about what sequels are. Sequels are extensions of what came before. They build on worlds, characters, and themes established in earlier work. Treating them as if they should be approachable at any entry point doesn't democratize storytelling—it diminishes it. It's not gatekeeping to say that people should experience a readily available, long-running story from the beginning rather than have it capitulate to a watered-down version of itself. The Marvel Cinematic Universe faced criticism for Avengers: Infinity War feeling like an advertisement for other films, with meanings outsourced to previous entries. But that film was explicitly billed as a culmination, a grand finale. Meeting it on those terms means accepting that it depends on what came before.

Square Enix wants players to think Rebirth stands alone. The company's fear of proclaiming that a $70 product might benefit from context found in other games has led to bad advice and broken trust. The industry needs to stop treating continuity as a problem worth hiding. Not every story needs MCU-level baggage, but not everyone needs to be scared of experiencing something whole.

We have made preparations so that players who did not get a chance to play the first game can fully enjoy Final Fantasy VII Rebirth.
— Motomu Toriyama, Final Fantasy VII Rebirth co-director
One of the goals we set out for at the beginning of Mass Effect 3 was to treat this like it was a movie... We really want people who are just picking this up for the first time to be able to just jump in.
— Mac Walters, Mass Effect 3 lead writer
Möchten Sie die ganze Geschichte? Das Original lesen bei Kotaku Australia ↗
Kontakt FAQ