Square Enix's 'Adventures of Elliot' blends Zelda-like action with JRPG storytelling

Sometimes it's just the basics of storytelling that makes a game appeal
The reviewer reflects on why mechanical complexity matters less than narrative craft in determining player engagement.
Mark

So you spent days analyzing the mechanics, and the answer was just that the story is good?

Mimi

I know, it sounds obvious when you say it out loud. But I kept waiting for the mechanical depth to justify why I was having fun. I kept comparing it to other games, looking for what made it special.

Mark

But it wasn't special mechanically.

Mimi

Not particularly, no. The combat works fine. The upgrades exist but don't matter much. The time travel is neat but not revolutionary. What I missed was that none of that had to be revolutionary. The game just needed to be competent at those things and excellent at character and story.

Mark

Does that feel like a cop-out? Like the game is coasting on presentation?

Mimi

It would be if the presentation were hollow. But the characters are genuinely written well. Elliot feels like a real person, not a vehicle for mechanics. The princess isn't a prize; she's someone you care about saving.

Mark

Even Faie?

Mimi

Especially Faie. Yes, she's an exposition device. Yes, she tells you obvious things. But there's something charming about her earnestness. She believes in what she's saying.

Mark

So the game succeeds by being honest about what it is—a JRPG first, everything else second.

Mimi

Exactly. It doesn't pretend to be a deep action game or a mind-bending time-travel puzzle box. It's a story about good people saving the world across time, told with care and skill.

  • A genre identity crisis runs beneath the surface — the game promises Zelda-style mechanical discovery but quietly enforces JRPG plot gates, leaving players navigating two rule sets at once.
  • The magicite upgrade system hints at genuine strategic depth, yet the game rarely demands players use it, leaving a promising system underutilized against enemies that fall to basic tactics.
  • Time travel, the story's central device, moves the narrative across civilizational ages with thematic weight, but never achieves the mechanical ingenuity of predecessors like Chrono Trigger or Radiant Historia.
  • Boss encounters reveal the developers' true capability — blending skill and problem-solving in ways the regular gameplay consistently fails to replicate.
  • Despite its contradictions, the game lands on firm ground: likeable characters, a visually distinctive HD-2D presentation, and storytelling rooted in classic JRPG sincerity carry the experience across its rougher edges.

In the long tradition of games that dare to blend genres, Square Enix's The Adventures of Elliot: The Millennium Tales arrives in 2026 as a quiet reminder that mechanical ambition and narrative warmth need not always travel together. Developed alongside Claytechworks, it guides players across three ages of a fictional civilization — from safekeeping through magic to reconstruction — weaving time-travel and dungeon exploration into a story that ultimately succeeds not through innovation, but through the enduring power of well-crafted characters and a world worth caring about. It is a game that fractures its own identity at the seams, yet holds together where it matters most.

Square Enix's The Adventures of Elliot: The Millennium Tales, released in June 2026 alongside developer Claytechworks, is a game that resists easy categorization — and mostly gets away with it. Players guide Elliot and his fairy companion Faie across three distinct eras of a fictional civilization, battling monsters and untangling time paradoxes in a world rendered through Square Enix's signature HD-2D style, layering 2D sprites into richly painted 3D environments.

On the surface, it moves like a classic Zelda game — semi-open overworld exploration, dungeons, puzzles, and a suite of seven weapons, shield parrying, and five fairy powers. The action feels responsive and the presentation is genuinely distinctive. But the game's design philosophy fractures under scrutiny: where Zelda gates progression through earned abilities, Elliot relies on plot permissions — the old 'broken bridge' logic. It's a subtle inconsistency that grows more visible the longer you play.

The magicite upgrade system, which allows layered weapon customization, suggests strategic depth that the game rarely asks players to explore. Regular combat is forgiving enough that default tactics suffice, though boss fights demonstrate the developers know how to craft genuinely demanding encounters when they choose to.

Time travel serves the story more than the mechanics. Watching civilizations rise and fall across ages carries real thematic weight, but the concept never reaches the puzzle-solving ingenuity of Chrono Trigger or Radiant Historia — it works without dazzling.

What ultimately holds the game together is something simpler: the characters. Elliot is earnest and likeable, the kingdom is populated with warmly archetypal figures, and even Faie — the chatty exposition fairy — earns genuine affection. The illustrated portraits and voice acting elevate every interaction. After all the genre analysis and mechanical comparison, the revelation is almost disarming: The Millennium Tales succeeds because it tells a good story, populates it with people worth following, and builds a world you want to stay in. For a game pulling in several directions at once, that foundation proves more than enough.

Square Enix's latest release, The Adventures of Elliot: The Millennium Tales, arrives as a peculiar hybrid—one that resists easy categorization yet somehow works. Released in June 2026 by Square Enix and Claytechworks, the game asks you to guide Elliot and his fairy companion Faie across multiple ages of human history, from the shielded Kingdom of Huther in the Age of Safekeeping through the prosperous Age of Magic and into the post-apocalyptic Age of Reconstruction, all while battling monsters and untangling time paradoxes to save humanity's last kingdom.

On the surface, it plays like a classic Zelda game. You explore a semi-open overworld, descend into dungeons, solve puzzles, and collect new abilities that theoretically expand where you can go and what you can do. The presentation alone justifies the journey—Square Enix's signature HD-2D style, which layers 2D sprites into 3D environments, combines with painted artwork and voice acting to create something visually distinctive. The moment-to-moment action feels responsive too. You wield seven different weapons, parry with a shield, jump through platforming sections, and deploy five fairy powers for both combat and puzzle-solving. It all clicks.

But here's where the game's identity fractures. Unlike classic Zelda titles, where progression is gated by the tools you find—you can't cross a river until you've beaten the dungeon that grants you magical swimming trunks—Elliot's advancement follows traditional RPG logic. You can't access the volcanic region not because you lack a magical ability, but because someone hasn't given you the volcano key yet. It's the old "broken bridge" design: plot gates, not mechanical gates. The distinction matters less than it sounds until you're halfway through and realize the game is playing by two different rule sets simultaneously.

The combat system includes an intriguing magicite upgrade mechanic that lets you customize weapons with layered effects—imagine a bow that shoots homing arrows that ignite on impact and then explode. The potential for strategic depth exists. Yet in practice, the game rarely demands it. Whacking enemies with a sword or bow works almost universally. Boss fights prove the developers understand how to craft genuinely interesting challenges that blend skill with problem-solving, but the regular gameplay rarely pushes you to think beyond your default tactics.

Time travel, the game's central narrative device, serves storytelling rather than mechanical purposes. You watch human civilization rise and fall across the ages, witness generations passing legacies to their distant descendants, and experience the weight of history. It's effective thematically. Yet compared to what other games have done with the concept—Chrono Trigger's sweeping scope from 65 million BC to 2300 AD, or Radiant Historia's clever exploitation of time mechanics to solve puzzles and quests—Elliot's approach feels more restrained. The time travel works, but it doesn't dazzle.

What actually makes the game compelling is simpler and more fundamental: the story and characters. Elliot himself is straightforward and likeable, a protagonist with genuine heroic instincts. The human kingdom is populated with decent people—a wise king, a charming princess, an obviously villainous advisor. It reads like a throwback to early JRPGs, where good triumphs over evil in its purest form, except executed with the craft and resources of developers who've spent decades learning from the genre. Even Faie, the chatty exposition fairy who announces every cracked wall you encounter, becomes endearing rather than annoying. The art style and illustrated character portraits elevate every interaction.

The game's true power, then, isn't mechanical innovation or narrative ambition—it's the mastery of fundamentals. After spending considerable effort analyzing the action systems, comparing time-travel implementations, and categorizing the game's genre identity, the revelation is almost embarrassing: what makes it work is simply good storytelling, likeable characters, and presentation that makes you want to spend time in this world. Everything else—the solid action, the time-travel framework, the upgrade systems—is seasoning on top of a narrative foundation that holds firm. For a game that could have been a confused mess of competing design philosophies, that's enough.

The best JRPGs' true ultimate final power has never been their gameplay mechanics, but instead it's all the stories they tell, the characters we get attached to, and the narrative themes they explore.
— The reviewer's analysis of what drives JRPG appeal
Vuoi la storia completa? Leggi l'originale su The Star ↗
Contattaci Domande frequenti