South Sudan's Kiir dissolves government, consolidates power ahead of elections

The 2018 peace deal that this decree dissolves ended a five-year civil war that killed approximately 400,000 people and displaced millions.
Kiir will be the only person in power, without vice-presidents, without the executive, without the parliament.
A lawyer and former constitution drafter describes the concentration of authority after Kiir dissolved the government.
Mark

So Kiir dissolved the entire government structure in one decree. What exactly does that mean for how South Sudan is run right now?

Mimi

It means there are no vice-presidents, no cabinet ministers, no local administrators anymore. Just Kiir and a caretaker administration. The parliament is gone too. He's essentially the only person making decisions until the election.

Luke

But the judiciary and security forces are still there, right? So it's not total vacuum.

Mimi

Right, those institutions remain. But the executive branch—the part that actually governs day-to-day—is now just Kiir.

Mark

And this was legal? Parliament approved it?

Mimi

Yes, parliament changed the electoral law the day before. They removed the requirement for a permanent constitution and census before elections could happen. That cleared the path for Kiir to dissolve everything.

Luke

So parliament approved its own dissolution? That seems circular.

Mimi

It does. And analysts say the new law is vague enough that Kiir could theoretically delay elections indefinitely without anyone to check him.

Mark

What about the opposition? Can they campaign?

Mimi

Riek Machar, the main opposition leader, is under house arrest on treason and murder charges. He can't organize freely. And Kiir just replaced the head of the elections commission without explanation.

Luke

So we have an opposition leader detained, a new elections chief with no stated reason for the change, and a president with unchecked power. That's a lot of moving pieces that could go wrong.

Mark

This all came from a peace deal that was supposed to prevent exactly this kind of power concentration, didn't it?

Mimi

The 2018 peace deal ended a five-year civil war and set up power-sharing to keep rivals in check. Kiir's decree essentially ends that arrangement.

Luke

And we don't know if elections will actually happen in December?

Mimi

We don't. The legal language is ambiguous enough that it could be delayed again.

  • In one stroke, Kiir removed every vice-president, minister, and local administrator, collapsing eight years of negotiated power-sharing into a caretaker government he alone controls.
  • Parliament quietly rewrote the electoral law the day before the decree, stripping away the constitutional and census requirements that were meant to anchor any legitimate vote.
  • Riek Machar — Kiir's chief rival and the opposition's figurehead — sits under house arrest on treason charges, unable to campaign while Kiir has already replaced the head of the elections commission without explanation.
  • Legal analysts warn the new framework contains deliberate ambiguity, giving the president authority to delay elections by a year or more with no parliamentary or executive body left to challenge him.
  • Juba's streets have tightened with checkpoints and security alerts, as the capital holds its breath over whether December's vote will materialize or quietly recede into another postponement.

In a nation still bearing the wounds of a civil war that claimed 400,000 lives, South Sudan's President Salva Kiir has dissolved the power-sharing government born from the 2018 peace agreement, consolidating executive authority into his own hands ahead of December elections. The architecture of compromise — built to hold rivals together through a fragile transition — has been swept away by decree and legislative revision in a single week. What remains is a caretaker government answerable to one man, a jailed opposition leader, and a legal framework that may permit the indefinite postponement of the very elections it was designed to enable. History watches carefully when the scaffolding of peace is dismantled before the building is complete.

On a Tuesday in September, President Salva Kiir signed a decree that dismantled South Sudan's transitional unity government in a single stroke — removing all vice-presidents, ministers, and local administrators and replacing them with a caretaker administration answerable only to him. The power-sharing arrangement he dissolved had been the cornerstone of the 2018 peace agreement that ended five years of civil war, a conflict that killed roughly 400,000 people and scattered millions more across the region.

The move was made legally possible the day before, when parliament revised the National Elections Act to allow Kiir to remain in office through the election period and to remove longstanding requirements — a permanent constitution, a national census — that had been considered preconditions for any legitimate vote. Elections, originally due in 2022 and postponed twice since, are now scheduled for December 22. The national and state assemblies have been dissolved. The judiciary and security services remain, but the executive branch is now a single man and his appointees.

The opposition has rejected the changes entirely. Kiir's longtime rival Riek Machar remains under house arrest on charges of treason and murder that he denies, unable to campaign or organize. Kiir also quietly replaced the head of the elections commission last week, installing a new figure with what state media described as a 'fresh mandate.' Analysts have been blunt about what this means in practice: one lawyer and former constitution drafter told AFP that Kiir is now 'the only person in power,' while an independent analyst warned the new law's ambiguities give the president authority to delay elections indefinitely without any institutional check.

In Juba, checkpoints have multiplied and security forces have been placed on heightened alert around the government complex. What was designed as a framework for shared governance and eventual democratic transition has become, through legal revision and executive decree, a consolidation of authority that leaves December's elections uncertain in both timing and integrity.

On Tuesday, South Sudan's President Salva Kiir signed a decree that dismantled the country's transitional unity government, removing all vice-presidents, ministers, and local administrators in a single stroke. The move cleared away the power-sharing architecture that had governed the nation since 2018, when a peace agreement ended five years of civil war that killed roughly 400,000 people and displaced millions more. Now, with elections scheduled for December 22, Kiir will remain in office as the sole executive authority until a new president is elected—if elections proceed as planned.

The decree came one day after parliament approved changes to the National Elections Act that made this consolidation legally possible. The revised law allows Kiir to stay in power during the election period and removes the requirement that South Sudan complete a permanent constitution or conduct a national census before voting. These had been longstanding conditions tied to the transition. The national and state assemblies have been dissolved. The judiciary and security institutions remain intact, but the executive branch now consists of a caretaker administration answerable to the president alone.

Elections were originally scheduled for 2022 but have been postponed twice. The 2018 peace deal that Kiir's decree now effectively ends was meant to hold the country together through a transition period while major tasks were completed: drafting a permanent constitution, registering voters, and unifying armed forces loyal to rival factions. None of these have been finished. The new legal framework sidesteps them entirely, allowing the country to move toward elections without resolving the underlying institutional questions that the peace agreement had deemed essential.

The main opposition alliance has rejected the changes outright. Riek Machar, Kiir's longtime rival and leader of the Sudan People's Liberation Movement-in-Opposition, remains under house arrest facing charges of treason and murder, which he denies. He will not be able to campaign or organize his party freely during the election period. Last week, Kiir also replaced the head of the elections commission without explanation, installing Gabriel Bol Deng Majok with what state media called a "fresh mandate" to oversee the polls.

Analysts and human rights observers have flagged the danger in what Kiir has done. Michael Wani, a lawyer and former member of the constitution drafting committee, told the AFP news agency that "Kiir will be the only person in power, without vice-presidents, without the executive, without the parliament." Independent analyst Machot Amuom pointed to what he called significant "ambiguity" in the legal changes. "The new law gives the president full powers," Amuom said. "He can decide even not to go for elections for another year or another two years." Amnesty International acknowledged the decree as a step toward holding elections but urged authorities to "ensure that a conducive environment exists for people to vote and stand in elections."

In the capital, Juba, security has tightened around the government complex. Checkpoints and road closures have been established, and security personnel were ordered to remain on heightened alert. The transition unfolds under conditions of restricted movement and heightened surveillance. What began as a peace agreement designed to distribute power among rivals has become, through legal revision and administrative decree, a concentration of authority in a single person's hands. Whether elections actually occur in December, and under what conditions, remains uncertain.

Kiir will be the only person in power, without vice-presidents, without the executive, without the parliament.
— Michael Wani, lawyer and former constitution drafting committee member
The new law gives the president full powers. He can decide even not to go for elections for another year or another two years.
— Machot Amuom, independent analyst
Quieres la nota completa? Lee el original en Al Jazeera ↗
Contáctanos FAQ