A large study of 124,000 British adults has quietly dismantled one of modern nutrition's most comfortable assumptions: that choosing diet over regular fizzy drinks is a meaningful act of self-care. Whether sweetened with sugar or artificial substitutes, a single daily can appears sufficient to raise the risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease by 50 to 60 percent — a finding that arrives at a moment when one in five UK adults already carry some form of liver damage. The research does not indict an occasional indulgence, but rather the slow accumulation of habit, and it points toward a simple,
Single daily fizzy drink linked to 60% higher liver disease risk, study finds
One in five UK adults have liver disease; untreated cases can lead to permanent organ scarring and failure.
The safest approach is to limit both sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened drinks.
Mark
So the study looked at 124,000 people. How did they actually measure who was drinking what and who developed liver disease?
Mimi
They used health records—so they had documented consumption patterns and medical diagnoses. It's observational data, which means they can show correlation but not prove causation in the way a controlled experiment could.
Luke
Right, and that matters. We know people who drink a lot of fizzy drinks might also eat worse in other ways, exercise less, carry more weight. The study controlled for some of those factors, but we can't be certain the drinks themselves are the sole cause.
Mark
Fair point. But the 60 percent figure for diet drinks—that's striking because people think they're safe.
Mimi
Exactly. That's the real news. Most people assume diet drinks are harmless because they have no sugar. This suggests the artificial sweeteners or something else in the formulation might be driving liver fat accumulation through a different mechanism.
Luke
Though we should note: the mechanism they propose—disrupted gut bacteria, altered insulin—is still somewhat speculative. They have evidence the correlation exists, but the exact biological pathway isn't fully proven.
Mark
What about the people who already have liver disease? Does this mean they should panic?
Mimi
Not panic, but it's a clear signal to stop. If you have fatty liver disease, removing these drinks entirely could help prevent progression to scarring.
Luke
And for people without it, the message is preventive. One can a day isn't an immediate death sentence, but it's a daily risk factor that compounds over years.
Mark
So water really is the answer?
Mimi
According to this study, yes. People who switched to water saw their risk decline. It's not complicated—it's just not what the beverage industry wants you to believe.
Luke
The one caveat: we don't have long-term data on what happens to someone who drinks one can a day for 30 years versus someone who never does. The study captures a snapshot of risk at a given time.
Le Pouls
- A study of 124,000 Britons has shattered the assumption that diet fizzy drinks are a safe substitute — they may actually carry slightly higher liver disease risk than the sugary versions they were meant to replace.
- The danger is not dramatic but insidious: one can a day, consumed routinely, is enough to raise the risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease by up to 60 percent.
- Sugar-laden drinks flood the liver with fat directly, while diet alternatives may quietly destabilise gut bacteria and distort the body's insulin response — two different roads to the same destination.
- The disease is especially treacherous because it advances in silence, with vague fatigue its only early signal, before hardening into permanent scarring and, eventually, organ failure.
- Researchers identified one clear exit from the risk: replacing soft drinks with water measurably reduces the likelihood of liver disease, making hydration not a lifestyle choice but a clinical recommendation.
A large study of 124,000 British adults has quietly dismantled one of modern nutrition's most comfortable assumptions: that choosing diet over regular fizzy drinks is a meaningful act of self-care. Whether sweetened with sugar or artificial substitutes, a single daily can appears sufficient to raise the risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease by 50 to 60 percent — a finding that arrives at a moment when one in five UK adults already carry some form of liver damage. The research does not indict an occasional indulgence, but rather the slow accumulation of habit, and it points toward a simple, if unglamorous, alternative: water.
A study tracking 124,000 British adults has overturned a widely held belief about diet soft drinks: they are not the safer option. Researchers found that consuming as little as one can of fizzy drink daily — whether full-sugar or artificially sweetened — significantly raises the risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Those drinking 250 millilitres or more of sugar-sweetened beverages each day were 50 percent more likely to develop the condition; for diet drink consumers, that figure rose to 60 percent.
The two drink types cause harm through different mechanisms. Sugar-sweetened beverages work directly, with the body converting excess sugar into fat that accumulates in liver tissue. Diet drinks appear to disrupt gut bacteria and interfere with insulin production, and may also trigger cravings for calorie-dense foods. Lead researcher Lihe Liu of Soochow University was unambiguous: both categories of sweetened drink share a common capacity for harm.
The condition is particularly dangerous because it progresses quietly. Early stages may produce only mild fatigue or vague discomfort, but over time the accumulated fat drives inflammation and scarring. That scarring — cirrhosis — is irreversible, gradually stripping the liver of its ability to filter blood and sustain the body's chemistry. Left untreated, it leads to organ failure.
The study's most actionable finding was also its simplest: people who replaced soft drinks with water saw their liver disease risk fall. Liu's recommendation was direct — limit both sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened drinks, and choose water instead. The research lands at a moment when non-alcoholic fatty liver disease is recognised as a growing global crisis, no longer associated only with heavy drinking. In Britain, where one in five adults already carry some degree of liver damage, the message is stark: between regular and diet soft drinks, there is no genuinely safer choice.
A study tracking 124,000 British adults has upended a widely held assumption about diet soft drinks: they are not the safer choice. Researchers found that people who consumed as little as one can of fizzy drink daily—whether full-sugar or artificially sweetened—faced a substantially elevated risk of developing non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Those drinking at least 250 milliliters of sugar-sweetened beverages per day were 50 percent more likely to develop the condition. The figure climbed to 60 percent for people consuming the same volume of diet alternatives, a finding that challenges the common marketing narrative that zero-sugar options represent a healthier path.
The implications matter because liver disease is already widespread in Britain. One in five adults are estimated to carry some form of liver disease, and the prevalence continues to climb. Lihe Liu, the study's lead author from Soochow University in China, emphasized that both categories of sweetened drink—the obvious culprits and the supposedly innocent ones—share a common mechanism of harm. Sugar-sweetened beverages work through a direct route: the body stores excess sugar as fat, which accumulates in liver tissue. Diet drinks operate through a different pathway, potentially disrupting the bacteria that live in the gut and interfering with how the body produces and responds to insulin. Some evidence also suggests artificially sweetened beverages may trigger cravings for calorie-dense foods, compounding the problem indirectly.
What makes this progression dangerous is its long arc. In the early stages, fatty liver disease often produces no symptoms at all, or only vague ones—fatigue, a sense of low energy, mild discomfort in the upper right abdomen. But over time, the accumulated fat can trigger inflammation and scarring. That scarring, called cirrhosis, is permanent. It stiffens the organ and prevents it from filtering blood, processing nutrients, and performing the hundreds of chemical tasks the liver handles every second. Eventually, untreated cirrhosis leads to organ failure, which is fatal.
Liu's team found one clear path to risk reduction: people who replaced soft drinks with water saw their liver disease risk decline. Water, Liu noted, both prevents fat from accumulating in the liver and provides the hydration the body needs. He was direct about the implications: "The safest approach is to limit both sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened drinks." The study does not suggest that one occasional can of cola will cause cirrhosis. Rather, it documents what happens when consumption becomes routine—when reaching for a fizzy drink is a daily habit rather than an occasional indulgence.
The findings land at a moment when liver disease is increasingly recognized as a global public health concern, no longer confined to people who drink heavily. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease now affects hundreds of millions worldwide, driven by diet, sedentary behavior, and metabolic factors. For people in Britain, where one in five already carry some degree of liver damage, the message is straightforward: the choice between regular and diet soft drinks is not really a choice at all. Both carry risk. The only meaningful alternative is to choose something else entirely.
Citations marquantes
Our findings challenge the common perception that these drinks are harmless. They highlight the need to reconsider their role in diet and liver health, especially as liver disease emerges as a global health concern.— Lihe Liu, study author from Soochow University
Envie de l'histoire complète ?
Lire l'original sur The Sun ↗
Science & Space