Seoul's 'coolest neighbourhood' loses its soul to tourism and gentrification

Vulnerable residents including sex workers, elderly drinkers, LGBTQ+ patrons, and low-income merchants have been displaced by rising rents and gentrification.
The neighbourhood that had hidden people became a place to be displayed in.
After the pandemic, tourism transformed Jongno 3-ga from a refuge for marginalized communities into an Instagram destination.
Mark

So you nominated this place five years ago, and now it's ranked number one in the world. That's a remarkable arc. What changed between then and now?

Mimi

The pandemic ended, and tourism exploded. But it wasn't just tourism—it was a specific kind of tourism, the Instagram kind. Suddenly there were queues outside places that used to be quiet refuges. Rents started climbing. The people who actually lived there couldn't afford to stay.

Luke

When you say rents rose sharply, do you have numbers? The piece says they rose, but I'm not seeing specific figures on how much or over what timeframe.

Mimi

That's fair. I don't have exact percentages in the reporting. What I can say is that the displacement was real and visible—the sex workers left, the elderly drinkers left, the small merchants left. The mechanism was clear even if I didn't quantify every increase.

Mark

You mention over a hundred gay bars and karaoke rooms. That's a striking detail. Was that neighbourhood specifically known as a gay district, or was it more that it just happened to be a place where that community felt safe?

Mimi

It wasn't marketed as a gay district. It was just a place where, after 9pm, there was an unofficial handover from the older crowd to the younger gay scene. It worked because nobody was watching, nobody was judging. It was incidental safety, not branded safety.

Luke

You say the neighbourhood was a refuge for "society's rejects"—that's your phrase, not the source's. The source says it was a refuge for people with nowhere to go, the poorest in Seoul, people with disabilities. Those are specific categories. Why reframe it?

Mimi

You're right to push back. I was trying to capture the feeling of the place, but I should have stuck with the concrete categories. The source is more precise than my language was.

Mark

What strikes me is that you're blaming yourself for the gentrification. But you didn't cause it. You just named it. Doesn't the real blame lie with the landlords, the developers, the tourism industry?

Mimi

Yes, and no. I didn't cause it, but I accelerated it. I drew attention to a place that was valuable precisely because it was overlooked. Once it was seen, once it was ranked, the market moved in. I was part of the machinery, even if I didn't build it.

Luke

The piece says K-culture has never been more popular, and that's driving tourism. But is that actually the cause of gentrification in Jongno 3-ga specifically, or is it just the backdrop? Gentrification happens in cities everywhere, with or without global cultural trends.

Mimi

Fair point. The global interest in Korean culture created the conditions, but the actual mechanism was local—landlords raising rents, merchants being priced out, vulnerable people having nowhere else to go. The K-culture boom was the accelerant, not the fire itself.

  • A neighbourhood built on radical acceptance—where sex workers, elderly drinkers, LGBTQ+ Koreans, and low-income artists coexisted without judgment—has been declared the world's coolest, triggering a wave of tourism that is dismantling the very conditions that made it meaningful.
  • Post-pandemic crowds arrived with cameras and queues stretching down the block, transforming a place of quiet refuge into a stage set for social media consumption.
  • Rents surged in the wake of the tourism boom, and the most vulnerable residents—elderly patrons, sex workers, small merchants who had held their leases for decades—were the first to be displaced.
  • Claw-machine arcades, unmanned photo booths, and kitschy souvenir shops now occupy the spaces where humble rice-and-soup restaurants and gay bars once stood, leaving the neighbourhood curated rather than lived-in.
  • The writer who submitted the original nomination carries a quiet guilt, recognising that celebrating an overlooked place for its authenticity can be the very mechanism that erases it.

In the old heart of Seoul, a neighbourhood once defined by its willingness to shelter the forgotten—the elderly, the poor, the queer, the dispossessed—has been crowned the world's coolest, and in that crowning, something essential has been lost. Jongno 3-ga offered what few places dare to: the freedom to exist without performance, without judgment, without the pressure to be seen. The writer who first nominated it now watches as Instagram queues replace chess boards, and chain bakeries displace the humble soup kitchens that fed generations. It is a parable as old as human longing itself—that the act of naming a sanctuary beautiful is often the first step toward its destruction.

Five years ago, a writer casually nominated Jongno 3-ga for a Time Out list of cool city neighbourhoods. This week, it was named the coolest in the world. The response was not pride—it was grief.

The writer had first come to this part of Seoul two decades earlier, when South Korea was still unfamiliar to most travellers. The shopfronts were worn, the alleys purposeless, the atmosphere entirely without pretence. What kept them there was not the aesthetics but the people: Jongno 3-ga had become a refuge for those the rest of Seoul preferred to ignore. The very poor lived in its cramped rooming houses. Elderly women sold sexual services in Tapgol Park while pensioners played chess on the pavement outside. Musicians and artists worked without venues or galleries. And for Seoul's LGBTQ+ community—in a country where being queer still carried genuine social cost—the neighbourhood's hundred-odd gay bars and street-food tents offered something rare: the freedom to exist without hiding. None of this was cool in any magazine's sense of the word. That was precisely what made it valuable.

Then the pandemic ended, and everything accelerated. The same food tents that had once fed the neighbourhood quietly now had hour-long queues of visitors photographing their meals. Landlords raised rents. The elderly drinkers left first, then the sex workers were pushed out, then the long-standing small merchants surrendered their leases. In their place arrived claw-machine arcades, photo booths, and an endless rotation of coffee shops and bakeries—a neighbourhood redesigned for consumption, stripped of the qualities that had made it a sanctuary.

The writer does not blame the visitors, who came because they were told the place was worth seeing and found exactly what they were sold. The guilt is more personal: in nominating a beloved, overlooked neighbourhood, they helped create the conditions for its erasure. The vulnerable people who gave Jongno 3-ga its character have been priced out or pushed away. What remains is a curated surface where a living community once stood. Being named the world's coolest neighbourhood, the writer concludes, is not a celebration—it is an epitaph.

Five years ago, I nominated my neighbourhood for a list. Time Out was asking writers around the world to suggest the coolest places in their cities, and I offered up Jongno 3-ga, the old heart of Seoul where I had chosen to live. The submission felt casual, almost throwaway. I didn't expect much to come of it. Then, this week, the same neighbourhood was named the coolest in the world. I should have felt vindicated. Instead, I felt something closer to grief.

I first arrived in this part of Seoul two decades earlier, fresh from school, when South Korea itself was still unfamiliar to most travellers. People warned me against the trip, sometimes confusing the country with its neighbour to the north. There were no English menus in the restaurants, but the owners welcomed me anyway. The shopfronts were worn, their windows full of handmade goods. The alleys twisted and led nowhere, and there was something deeply comfortable about that purposelessness. Men drank soju late into the evening. The place was humble, raw, utterly without pretence. I stayed.

What drew me most was who lived here. Jongno 3-ga had become a refuge for people the rest of Seoul wanted to forget: the very poor, residents of the city's cramped rooming houses, people with disabilities, musicians and artists working without galleries or venues. In Tapgol Park, elderly women sold sexual services to older men in the open air. Outside the park, pensioners played janggi, Korean chess, on the pavement. The neighbourhood asked nothing of anyone and judged no one. For the LGBTQ+ community in a deeply conservative country where being queer still carried real social cost and real danger, it was something rarer: a place to exist without hiding. On weekend nights, hundreds of men came to the street-food tents and the more than a hundred gay bars and karaoke rooms scattered through the area, finally able to be themselves.

None of this was cool in the way magazines understand cool. That was precisely the point. People could move through the neighbourhood unmolested by the need to perform, to consume, to be seen. In a culture obsessed with status and appearances, it was a pocket of genuine refuge.

Then the pandemic ended, and everything accelerated. The street barbecues and food tents remained, but now they had lines stretching down the block, people waiting an hour for a seat so they could photograph their meal and post it online. The neighbourhood that had hidden people became a place to be displayed in. With the crowds came the landlords. Rents climbed. The older drinkers left first, then the sex workers were pushed out. The chess boards disappeared from outside the park. One by one, the small merchants who had run the same shops for decades gave up their leases. In their place came claw-machine arcades, kitschy tourist shops, unmanned photo booths, and an endless succession of bakeries and coffee shops. The humble rice-and-soup restaurants that had fed the neighbourhood for generations became harder to find. What had been shabby and unremarkable was now heavily curated, designed for consumption, no longer recognisably Korean.

I don't blame the visitors. They came because they were told this place was worth seeing, and they bought exactly what they were sold. K-culture is everywhere now—BTS, Squid Game, the whole world watching South Korea. The crowds were inevitable. But standing in the neighbourhood now, watching it transform into something unrecognisable, I feel complicit. I highlighted a place I loved precisely because it was overlooked, and in doing so, I helped create the conditions for its erasure. The vulnerable people who made this neighbourhood what it was—the elderly, the queer, the poor, the artists—have been priced out or pushed away. Their refuge is gone. And I helped sell it.

Jongno 3-ga being named the world's coolest neighbourhood is not a victory. It's a loss. If I could take back the word, I would.

In Jongno 3-ga, everyone was welcome. It was a place where people could be themselves, without fear of being outed, harassed or judged.
— The author, describing the neighbourhood before gentrification
I highlighted a place I loved for being overlooked, and feel I helped create a monster.
— The author, reflecting on nominating the neighbourhood for the 'coolest' list
Contact Us FAQ