SCO emerging as Global South power, Pakistani scholar says

Positive framing of SCO through single expert voice; implicit criticism of Western powers as 'flexing muscles'; presents Global South autonomy narrative without examining potential SCO limitations or alternative perspectives on its effectiveness.

SCO emerging as alternative multilateral framework challenging Western-dominated international order. Shift toward multipolarity with Global South nations gaining agency in resource management and policy formulation outside traditional Western-led institutions. China-Russia axis strengthened through SCO expansion.

Similar to Non-Aligned Movement (1961) positioning Global South as independent bloc, though SCO has stronger institutional mechanisms and great power backing (China-Russia).

Potential long-term effects on consumer prices through alternative supply chains and trade routes; increased competition in global markets could moderate inflation but may create short-term supply chain uncertainties for consumers in Western economies.

Western governments may respond with trade policy adjustments, sanctions frameworks, or counter-alliance building. SCO members may pursue coordinated monetary policies, alternative payment systems, and reduced dollar-dependence. Potential for increased protectionism and fragmentation of global economic governance.