More than sixteen years after the Fort Hood massacre claimed thirteen lives, the United States government is preparing not only to execute the man responsible, but to do so before a global audience — a decision that reopens ancient questions about whether justice is best served in public or in solemnity. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has announced that Nidal Hasan's December firing squad execution at Fort Hood will be livestreamed, marking the first military execution since 1961 and the first public execution in America since 1936. The choice to broadcast what has long been a witnessed-but-pr
Pentagon plans to livestream execution of Fort Hood shooter Nidal Hasan
echoes of the past we seem to have put behind us
So the Pentagon is going to broadcast an execution. That's the headline here?
That's the headline. Hasan killed 13 people at Fort Hood in 2009, was convicted in 2013, and now Hegseth has announced the firing squad will be livestreamed in early December. It's the first public execution in the U.S. since 1936.
Why is Hegseth doing this? What's the stated reason?
He says people need to see the consequences. He told a media outlet that the public should understand there are serious repercussions for these kinds of acts. It's framed as transparency and accountability.
But is it? Or is it spectacle? Because there's a reason we stopped doing public executions nearly a century ago. The last one drew 20,000 people in Kentucky.
That's exactly what the law professor from Texas Tech said—Geoffrey Corn. He called it an echo of a past we'd moved beyond. He said executions normally have restricted galleries for a reason: it acknowledges the gravity of what's happening.
Has Hasan's case been through appeals?
Yes. He represented himself at trial, which was unusual. He admitted to the shooting and claimed he was protecting Islamic insurgents. His attorneys were actually worried he wanted the death penalty. He petitioned the Supreme Court in 2024 on procedural grounds—said the judge cleared the courtroom during some legal discussions, violating his right to a public trial.
And the Supreme Court?
Declined to hear it last year.
So this is the first military execution since when?
1961. And the first firing squad in the military since 1945—Private Eddie Slovik, desertion during World War II.
I want to be clear: we're talking about one person's execution here, not a broader policy shift, right? This is Hegseth's decision for this case?
That's what the reporting shows. Hegseth recommended it, Trump approved it. There's no indication this is a new military protocol.
What do we know about the victims?
Thirteen people were killed in the 2009 shooting. More than 30 were wounded. The source material doesn't name them individually or describe their circumstances.
So we know the scale of the harm but not the human detail of it.
Correct. The focus of the reporting is on the execution method and its public nature, not on the victims' stories or families' positions on the livestream.
El Pulso
- A nation that quietly moved executions behind closed doors nearly a century ago is now being asked to watch one unfold in real time, and the discomfort is immediate and widespread.
- Legal scholars warn that livestreaming a firing squad execution does not merely bend modern protocol — it shatters it, evoking the carnival atmosphere of public hangings that American justice deliberately left behind.
- Hegseth frames the broadcast as a moral statement, arguing that visible consequences are necessary for acts of mass violence against fellow soldiers, while critics argue spectacle and justice are not the same thing.
- Hasan's own legal journey has been labyrinthine — he represented himself, appeared to seek death, and exhausted appeals up to the Supreme Court — leaving the execution itself as the last unresolved question.
- The decision, approved by President Trump and announced publicly, is already reshaping the national conversation around capital punishment, military justice, and the government's power to define what accountability looks like.
More than sixteen years after the Fort Hood massacre claimed thirteen lives, the United States government is preparing not only to execute the man responsible, but to do so before a global audience — a decision that reopens ancient questions about whether justice is best served in public or in solemnity. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has announced that Nidal Hasan's December firing squad execution at Fort Hood will be livestreamed, marking the first military execution since 1961 and the first public execution in America since 1936. The choice to broadcast what has long been a witnessed-but-private act of state force invites a society to reckon with what it believes punishment is truly for — accountability, deterrence, closure, or something older and less comfortable.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced this week that the Pentagon will livestream the execution of Nidal Hasan, the former Army major who killed thirteen people and wounded more than thirty at Fort Hood in 2009. Scheduled for early December and carried out by firing squad, the execution will be made available for public viewing — a decision that has drawn immediate scrutiny from legal experts and historians alike.
Hasan was court-martialed in 2013, represented himself at trial, and admitted to the attack, claiming he acted to protect Islamic insurgents from U.S. military operations. He was sentenced to death. His subsequent appeals, including a 2024 petition to the Supreme Court arguing that a judge had improperly cleared the courtroom during proceedings, were ultimately unsuccessful.
Hegseth defended the livestream decision on the program Real America's Voice, framing it as a matter of public accountability. 'People need to understand that there are serious consequences for these types of things,' he said. The plan was recommended by Hegseth and approved by President Trump.
The historical weight of the decision is considerable. The last public execution in the United States occurred in 1936, when Rainey Bethea was hanged before an estimated crowd of 20,000 in Kentucky. Since then, executions have been conducted with restricted access — typically limited to victims' families, media witnesses, and official observers. Geoffrey Corn, a Texas Tech law professor and former Army Judge Advocate General, told CBS News the plan 'raises significant moral questions' and warned that broadcasting the execution carries 'echoes of the past we seem to have put behind us.'
If carried out as planned, Hasan's execution will be the first military execution of an American service member since 1961 and the first military use of a firing squad since Private Eddie Slovik was executed for desertion in 1945. The case has always carried unusual legal dimensions — Hasan's own defense attorneys once worried he was deliberately seeking a death sentence — and its final chapter now promises to be no less contested.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth announced this week that the Pentagon will livestream the execution of Nidal Hasan, the former Army major convicted of killing 13 people at Fort Hood in 2009. The execution, scheduled for early December at 1 p.m. at Fort Hood, will be carried out by firing squad and made available for public viewing—a decision that marks a striking departure from modern American practice and has already drawn scrutiny from legal experts.
Hasan was court-martialed in 2013 and convicted of murdering 13 people and wounding more than 30 others in the 2009 shooting. At trial, he represented himself and admitted responsibility for the attack, claiming he opened fire on fellow soldiers to protect Islamic insurgents from U.S. military operations. A military judge sentenced him to death. The case has moved through a lengthy appeals process; Hasan petitioned the Supreme Court in 2024 to review his conviction on grounds that a judge had cleared the courtroom during discussions of certain legal issues, violating his right to a public trial. The high court declined to hear the case last year.
Hegseth, speaking on the program Real America's Voice, framed the public execution as a matter of accountability. "He's gonna get a firing squad of soldiers, as it should be," Hegseth said. "We'll make sure that people are able to watch it, that it's public—because people need to understand that there's serious consequences for these types of things." The plan was recommended by Hegseth and approved by President Trump, according to Pentagon spokesman Sean Parnell.
The decision to livestream a capital execution is virtually without precedent in recent American history. The last public execution in the United States took place in 1936, when Rainey Bethea was hanged for rape in Kentucky before a crowd estimated at around 20,000 people. Since then, executions have been conducted with restricted access, typically limited to victims' family members, media representatives, and official witnesses. Geoffrey Corn, a Texas Tech University law professor who served as an Army Judge Advocate General, told CBS News the livestream plan "raises significant moral questions, above and beyond the questions related to the death penalty generally." He noted that the traditional protocol limiting observers reflects "an acknowledgment of the gravity of the penalty to be imposed" and warned that broadcasting the execution "echoes of the past we seem to have put behind us."
If carried out, Hasan's execution would mark the first military execution of an American service member since 1961, when a soldier was hanged for raping and attempting to murder an 11-year-old girl. It would also represent the military's first use of a firing squad since 1945, when Private Eddie Slovik was executed for desertion during World War II. Hegseth cited that historical gap in his public remarks. In the civilian sphere, firing squads have seen limited recent use; South Carolina carried out three executions by firing squad last year. The federal government typically relies on lethal injection for civilian death penalty cases, though the Justice Department has indicated openness to alternative methods including firing squads and electrocution.
Hasan's path to execution has been marked by unusual legal circumstances. During his trial, his own military attorneys expressed concern that he was deliberately pursuing a death sentence, a worry that shaped how the proceedings unfolded. His subsequent appeals, including the Supreme Court petition, centered on procedural fairness rather than challenging the conviction itself. CBS News reached out to Hasan's attorney for comment on the livestream announcement but had not received a response at the time of reporting.
Citas Notables
People need to understand that there's serious consequences for these types of things.— Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth
Turning the execution into a public spectacle echoes of the past we seem to have put behind us.— Geoffrey Corn, Texas Tech University law professor