For twenty-one years, Erik Slavin helped steward a newspaper that existed in a rare and fragile arrangement — funded by the military, yet pledged to independence. When he said publicly that censorship would be a line he would not cross, the Pentagon dismissed him for insubordination, along with his publisher and a colleague. The firing of Stars and Stripes' leadership is not merely an institutional dispute; it is a moment in the longer American story of who controls the narrative of war, and whether those who serve are permitted to be seen honestly.
Pentagon fires Stars and Stripes editor over censorship concerns
Sailors aboard USS Abraham Lincoln experiencing mental health crises after record 240+ days at sea, with some reportedly attempting suicide.
This is a time when we really need to hear what's happening
Mark
Why does it matter that the Pentagon fired the editor of its own newspaper? Isn't that just an internal personnel decision?
Mimi
Because Stars and Stripes isn't really the Pentagon's newspaper in the way a corporate newsletter belongs to a company. Congress mandated that it operate independently, even though the military funds it. The moment that independence disappears, service members lose their primary source of trustworthy information about their own institution.
Mark
But Slavin was fired for insubordination, not for publishing something. What did he actually do wrong?
Mimi
He said in an interview that censorship would be a red line. That's not insubordination in the traditional sense—it's a statement of principle about how journalism should work. The Pentagon interpreted it as disloyalty.
Mark
The USS Abraham Lincoln story—sailors attempting suicide after 240 days at sea. Did Stars and Stripes break that story, or was it already public?
Mimi
Stars and Stripes reported on the conditions. Whether that reporting triggered the firing or was simply the context for it, we don't know. Slavin wasn't given an official explanation. But the timing suggests the Pentagon wanted the story suppressed or controlled.
Mark
Is this just about Trump, or is this a longer institutional problem?
Mimi
The Trump administration has been aggressive—taking control of the presidential press pool, blocking outlets, creating new access restrictions. But the fact that Congress had to mandate independence for a military newspaper in the first place tells you the Pentagon has always wanted editorial control. This administration is just being more open about it.
Le Pouls
- Erik Slavin, editor for twenty-one years, was fired days after warning in a CBS interview that censorship would be a red line — a statement the Pentagon treated as grounds for insubordination.
- Publisher Max Lederer and Middle East reporter Lara Korte were dismissed the same day, signaling a coordinated purge rather than an isolated personnel decision.
- The firings land against a backdrop of sailors aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln enduring a record 240-plus days at sea, with reported suicide attempts and mental health crises that Stars and Stripes had begun to document.
- The Pentagon has held no press conference since May and has moved to restrict building access to journalists who report only officially authorized information — a policy major outlets have already rejected.
- Congress holds a legal mandate requiring Stars and Stripes to maintain editorial independence, but whether it will act to enforce that mandate now faces its most serious test.
For twenty-one years, Erik Slavin helped steward a newspaper that existed in a rare and fragile arrangement — funded by the military, yet pledged to independence. When he said publicly that censorship would be a line he would not cross, the Pentagon dismissed him for insubordination, along with his publisher and a colleague. The firing of Stars and Stripes' leadership is not merely an institutional dispute; it is a moment in the longer American story of who controls the narrative of war, and whether those who serve are permitted to be seen honestly.
Erik Slavin spent twenty-one years at Stars and Stripes, the military newspaper that occupies a peculiar and carefully balanced position in American journalism — funded by the Department of Defense, yet protected by congressional mandate to operate with editorial independence. That balance collapsed on a Tuesday in August, when the Pentagon fired him. The stated reason was insubordination. Slavin believes the real reason was a single sentence he spoke in a CBS interview: that censorship would be a red line.
On the same day, publisher Max Lederer — who had announced his retirement just the day before, citing a fundamental divergence from the Pentagon's vision — was also dismissed. So was Lara Korte, a reporter covering the Middle East. Both Slavin and Korte were told their firings stemmed from insubordination, both trace it to the CBS appearance. Slavin told the BBC he received no official explanation and was given no right of appeal.
The dismissals arrived as Stars and Stripes had been reporting on conditions aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln, a carrier deployed in the Gulf for more than 240 consecutive days — a record. Families of sailors had raised alarms about deteriorating mental health. Some sailors had reportedly attempted to jump overboard. The Pentagon, meanwhile, had not held a press conference since May.
The firings fit a recognizable pattern. The Trump administration had already broken with tradition by taking direct control of the White House press pool, and a federal judge had been required to order the restoration of the Associated Press's access to presidential events. Major outlets including the BBC, CNN, the New York Times, and the Washington Post had rejected a Pentagon policy that would have conditioned building access on reporting only officially authorized information. Now the military was asserting the same logic over its own newspaper.
Korte called the dismissals a shame for service members who had sworn to defend the Constitution and deserved a free press. The National Press Club demanded Slavin's firing be reversed immediately. The Pentagon declined to comment. The question left standing was whether Congress would move to protect the editorial independence it had written into law — or whether that law would quietly become a relic.
Erik Slavin had worked at Stars and Stripes for twenty-one years. On a Tuesday in August, the Pentagon fired him. The official reason was insubordination. The real reason, Slavin believes, was something he said in an interview: that censorship would be a red line, even in a hypothetical situation.
Stars and Stripes is not an ordinary newspaper. It is funded partly by the Department of Defense, yet Congress and Pentagon rules have long required it to operate with editorial independence. It reaches roughly 1.4 million people daily, mostly online, though it still prints physical editions for service members stationed overseas in places where internet is unreliable. For decades, this arrangement has held: the military pays, but the newsroom decides what to publish.
On the same day Slavin was dismissed, the paper's publisher, Max Lederer, was also fired. Lederer had announced his retirement the day before, stating that his vision of the newspaper's mission and value had diverged from the Pentagon's in fundamental ways. A reporter named Lara Korte, who covers the Middle East, was terminated as well. Both Slavin and Korte were told their dismissals were for insubordination. Both trace the decision back to an interview they gave to CBS's Sunday Morning program the previous month.
Slavin told the BBC he had received no official explanation for his firing and was not permitted to appeal. He said he did not know whether the dismissal stemmed from the paper's reporting on conditions aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln, a carrier that had been deployed in the Gulf for more than 240 consecutive days—a record stretch. Family members of sailors aboard the ship had raised alarms about mental health deterioration. Some sailors had reportedly attempted to jump overboard. Stars and Stripes had covered these conditions. The Pentagon had not held a press conference since May.
What troubled Slavin most was the broader climate. Pentagon officials, he told the BBC, seemed increasingly unwilling to speak on the record. This is a time when the public needs to know what is happening, he said. The dismissals arrived amid a larger pattern of tension between the Trump administration and independent news outlets. In October, major outlets including the New York Times, Washington Post, CNN, and the BBC had rejected a new Pentagon policy that would have barred journalists from entering the building unless they reported only information officially authorized by the Department of Defense. The administration said the restrictions were necessary for national security.
Korte responded to her firing on social media, writing that the dismissals were a shame for the institution and for service members who had sworn to defend the Constitution and deserved access to a free and independent press. Mark Schoeff Jr., president of the National Press Club, called Slavin's firing another brazen attempt by the Pentagon to control military coverage and demanded it be reversed immediately.
The Pentagon declined to comment to the BBC. But the pattern was clear. In April 2025, a federal judge had ordered the administration to restore the Associated Press's access to presidential events after it was blocked over a dispute about terminology. Months before that, the White House had broken with tradition and taken direct control of the press pool covering the presidency. Now the military was moving in the same direction, asserting control over its own official newspaper. The question was whether Congress would intervene to protect the editorial independence that had been written into law.
Citations marquantes
In a hypothetical situation, censorship would be a red line— Erik Slavin, in CBS interview
Service members who swore to defend the Constitution deserve the right to a free and independent press— Lara Korte, Middle East reporter, on social media
Envie de l'histoire complète ?
Lire l'original sur BBC News ↗
Politics & Governance