On a Monday weighted with competing signals, oil markets registered a cautious exhale as Russia and Ukraine agreed to spare each other's energy infrastructure — a fragile truce brokered through a diesel-supply arrangement and announced by President Trump. Yet the relief was partial at best: Brent crude fell only modestly to $103.35 a barrel, held aloft by a Middle East still burning, tankers under attack in the Strait of Hormuz, and the enduring human truth that peace in one corridor rarely quiets the storms gathering in another.
Oil Slips on Russia-Ukraine Energy Deal, But Middle East Tensions Keep Brent Above $100
Houthi strike on Riyadh airport killed 13 people and wounded over 300; additional injuries reported from subsequent Sunday attack.
Without clearer evidence the ceasefire will hold, the pullback will stay limited
Mark
So oil fell on Monday, but only a little. What's the actual story here—is the ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine good news for prices or not?
Mimi
It should be good news in theory. More Russian oil flowing means more supply, which pushes prices down. And that's what happened—Brent dropped 1.31%. But the drop was small because traders aren't convinced the ceasefire will actually hold.
Luke
Right, and we should be clear about what we know: Trump announced it, Zelenskiy said he was waiting to see details, and Russia said nothing. That's not exactly a signed treaty.
Mimi
Exactly. Tim Waterer from KCM Trade said without clearer evidence the ceasefire will stick, the price pullback will stay limited. So the market is hedging its bets.
Mark
And the Middle East is keeping prices up?
Mimi
Yes. The Houthis attacked Riyadh's airport on Saturday, killing 13 people and wounding over 300. There was another attack on Sunday. Trump said the US might join Saudi strikes against them. Plus tankers are being hit in the Strait of Hormuz.
Luke
Those are real incidents with real consequences. But I want to be careful: are we saying the tanker attacks are definitely connected to the broader Iran-US conflict, or is that an inference?
Mimi
The reporting says the Houthis are backed by Iran and that the US-Israel conflict with Iran started in February. The tanker strikes are happening in the same region. It's reasonable to connect them, but you're right—the source doesn't explicitly state causation.
Mark
So what does Goldman Sachs think happens next?
Mimi
They raised their December Brent forecast to $90, up from $85. They think Middle East supply will eventually adapt and prices will fall. But they're pricing in a $20 risk premium for the possibility of escalation.
Luke
That's a significant cushion. It means they're saying there's real uncertainty about whether things get worse.
Mark
And the US Gulf of Mexico?
Mimi
Hurricane Isaias hit Saturday. Shell, Chevron, and BP are working to get their platforms back online. It's another supply disruption, though temporary.
Luke
So we have three separate supply stories: Russia potentially coming back online, Middle East under stress, and the Gulf of Mexico recovering from a hurricane. That's a lot of moving pieces.
Mimi
Which is probably why the market didn't overreact to the ceasefire news. There's too much else happening.
El Pulso
- A US-brokered energy ceasefire between Russia and Ukraine sent oil prices lower, but analysts warned the agreement could dissolve without verified implementation — Ukraine's president said he had not yet seen the details.
- Houthi strikes on Riyadh's international airport killed 13 people and wounded over 300, with a second attack the following day, keeping the threat of regional escalation viscerally alive.
- Drone and projectile strikes on tankers near Oman and through the Strait of Hormuz threatened to unravel September's hard-won gains in Middle Eastern crude exports and push shipping costs sharply higher.
- Goldman Sachs raised its December Brent forecast to $90 a barrel while embedding a $20 risk premium into its models — a quiet acknowledgment that the market is pricing in the possibility of something worse.
- Hurricane Isaias added a Western Hemisphere disruption to the mix, forcing Shell, Chevron, and BP to suspend Gulf of Mexico operations even as the world's attention was fixed on wars thousands of miles away.
On a Monday weighted with competing signals, oil markets registered a cautious exhale as Russia and Ukraine agreed to spare each other's energy infrastructure — a fragile truce brokered through a diesel-supply arrangement and announced by President Trump. Yet the relief was partial at best: Brent crude fell only modestly to $103.35 a barrel, held aloft by a Middle East still burning, tankers under attack in the Strait of Hormuz, and the enduring human truth that peace in one corridor rarely quiets the storms gathering in another.
Oil markets pulled in opposite directions on Monday. Brent crude slipped 1.31% to $103.35 a barrel and West Texas Intermediate fell to $90.55, both responding to President Trump's announcement that Russia and Ukraine had agreed to stop targeting each other's energy infrastructure — a deal tied to a US-brokered diesel-supply arrangement with Moscow. The prospect of Russian oil moving more freely through global markets offered some relief. But the relief was measured.
Analysts cautioned against optimism. Tim Waterer of KCM Trade noted that without proof the ceasefire would hold, price declines would remain limited. Ukrainian President Zelenskiy said he was still waiting to see what had actually been agreed. Russia said nothing publicly.
What kept prices from falling further was the Middle East. Houthi forces claimed a Saturday strike on Riyadh's international airport that killed 13 and wounded more than 300, followed by another attack the next day. President Trump said the United States was weighing direct involvement in Saudi military operations against the Houthis — a group backed by Iran — framing it as part of a broader conflict the US and Israel had entered in February.
Shipping lanes compounded the anxiety. A drone struck a vessel near Oman's Sohar anchorage, and another tanker was damaged by an unknown projectile in the Strait of Hormuz. The incidents threatened to reverse September's gains in regional crude exports and raised the prospect of tightening supply and climbing freight costs.
Goldman Sachs raised its December Brent forecast to $90 a barrel — up from $85 — while flagging a risk premium of just over $20 built into current prices to account for potential escalation. The bank projected WTI averaging $81 in December 2026 and $73 in 2027, noting that high transatlantic shipping costs had pushed the US benchmark unusually low relative to Brent.
In the Gulf of Mexico, Shell, Chevron, and BP were working to restore offshore production after Hurricane Isaias made landfall Saturday. The storm was one more variable in a global energy picture shaped equally by geopolitics, fragile diplomacy, and the weather — all of it ultimately arriving at the same place: what people pay to fill a tank.
Oil markets moved in two directions at once on Monday. Brent crude fell $1.37 to $103.35 a barrel—a 1.31% decline—while West Texas Intermediate dropped $1.30 to $90.55, both responding to news that might have suggested relief. President Trump announced on Sunday that Ukraine and Russia had agreed to halt attacks on each other's energy infrastructure, a development tied to a diesel-supply arrangement the US had brokered with Moscow. The prospect of Russian oil flowing more freely into global markets eased some immediate pressure on prices.
Yet the pullback was modest, and analysts were cautious about reading too much into it. Tim Waterer, chief analyst at KCM Trade, noted that questions lingered about whether any ceasefire would actually hold. Without concrete evidence that the agreement would stick, he said, the downward movement in prices would likely remain limited. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy said he was still waiting to see the details of what had been agreed to. Russia offered no public comment.
What kept crude prices from falling further was the Middle East. The Houthis claimed responsibility for a Saturday strike on Riyadh's international airport that killed 13 people and wounded more than 300. Saudi authorities reported additional injuries from another attack on the airport the following day. President Trump said on Saturday that the United States was considering joining Saudi military operations against the Houthis, a group backed by Iran, in what he framed as part of a broader conflict that the US and Israel had launched in February.
Tanker traffic through critical shipping lanes added another layer of risk. The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations reported over the weekend that one vessel had been struck by a drone near Sohar anchorage in Oman, while another was damaged by an unknown projectile while passing through the Strait of Hormuz. These incidents, accumulating through October, threatened to reverse the gains in Middle Eastern crude exports that had materialized in September. Each attack raised the possibility that shipping costs would climb and supply would tighten.
Goldman Sachs responded to this mixed picture by raising its December forecast for Brent crude to $90 a barrel, up from $85. The bank's analysts, led by Daan Struyven, said they still expected Middle Eastern supply adjustments to eventually push prices lower over time. But they also flagged what they called a risk premium of just over $20 a barrel—the extra cost built into prices to account for the possibility that Middle East tensions could escalate further. For West Texas Intermediate, Goldman projected an average of $81 in December 2026 and $73 in 2027, noting that WTI had been trading unusually low relative to Brent because of high shipping costs between the US and Europe.
In the Gulf of Mexico, the picture was one of disruption and recovery. Shell, Chevron, and BP were working to redeploy staff and restore production at offshore platforms after Hurricane Isaias made landfall early Saturday. The storm added another variable to an already complex global energy landscape—one where geopolitical risk in the Middle East, fragile ceasefires in Eastern Europe, and weather events in the Western Hemisphere were all competing to shape what consumers would eventually pay at the pump.
Citas Notables
Questions remain over the validity and longevity of any such ceasefire, and without clearer evidence that it will actually hold, the extent of the pullback is likely to stay limited.— Tim Waterer, KCM Trade chief analyst
We maintain our base case that continued adaptation of Mideast supply will eventually reduce crude oil prices, while potential renewed escalation still poses significant net upside risk.— Goldman Sachs analysts led by Daan Struyven
Quieres la nota completa?
Lee el original en The Economic Times ↗