In the volatile intersection of geopolitics and global energy, oil prices eased Friday after President Trump signaled the United States would not strike Iran before November's midterm elections — a statement that briefly quieted markets that had spent the week anticipating the opposite. Yet the calm was partial and provisional: the Strait of Hormuz remains a contested corridor, fresh sanctions continue to tighten around Iranian oil networks, and Hurricane Isaias has shuttered nearly two-thirds of Gulf of Mexico production. The world's energy markets are learning, once again, that relief and ri
Oil prices fall as Trump eases Iran attack concerns ahead of elections
The election calendar had bought some breathing room.
Mark
Why did oil prices fall if there are still so many threats to supply?
Mimi
Trump's statement removed one specific threat—the possibility of a US military strike before the elections. That was weighing on prices all week. The market was pricing in worst-case scenarios.
Luke
But he didn't say no attack would happen after the elections, right? And the sanctions continued on Thursday. So what actually changed?
Mimi
The timing changed. The market cares about immediate risk. A strike in November is different from a strike in October when you're trying to price crude for the next few weeks.
Mark
What about the Strait of Hormuz? That's still a chokepoint for 20% of global oil.
Mimi
It is. And shipping attacks did spike earlier in the week, which is why prices had climbed so much. But the diplomatic signal—Iran reviewing a US response to reopen it within seven days—suggested maybe there's a path forward.
Luke
Suggested. But we don't know what Iran's review will conclude, or whether the US will accept whatever they propose. That's still completely open.
Mark
And the hurricane in the Gulf of Mexico—that's shutting down over 60% of production there?
Mimi
Yes, 1.3 million barrels a day. That's real supply loss happening right now, not a future threat.
Luke
So you have immediate supply pain from the hurricane, but the market is focused on the geopolitical risk that just got slightly smaller. That's why prices fell even though the actual disruptions are ongoing.
Mark
What happens next?
Mimi
We wait to see what Iran says about reopening the strait, and whether the US finds that acceptable. And the hurricane moves through or doesn't.
El Pulso
- Oil had surged 4% on Thursday alone as reports of a possible pre-election US strike on Iran sent traders scrambling — then Trump's reassurance unwound much of that fear in a single statement.
- The Strait of Hormuz, once the passage for one-fifth of the world's oil, has become a war-era gauntlet of shipping attacks, keeping supply anxiety simmering beneath any diplomatic calm.
- Iran's Foreign Minister is reviewing a US response to a proposal that could reopen the strait within seven days — a narrow window of potential de-escalation that markets are watching closely.
- Even as diplomacy flickered, Washington imposed new sanctions Thursday on seventeen vessels and the networks moving Iranian crude, signaling that economic pressure is running parallel to any talks.
- Hurricane Isaias compounded the week's disruptions by forcing the shutdown of 1.3 million barrels per day — nearly 63% of Gulf of Mexico output — reminding markets that nature, too, sets the price of oil.
In the volatile intersection of geopolitics and global energy, oil prices eased Friday after President Trump signaled the United States would not strike Iran before November's midterm elections — a statement that briefly quieted markets that had spent the week anticipating the opposite. Yet the calm was partial and provisional: the Strait of Hormuz remains a contested corridor, fresh sanctions continue to tighten around Iranian oil networks, and Hurricane Isaias has shuttered nearly two-thirds of Gulf of Mexico production. The world's energy markets are learning, once again, that relief and risk can occupy the same moment.
Oil prices pulled back Friday after a week of sharp swings driven by fear of military escalation in the Middle East. Brent crude settled at $103.53 a barrel, down 0.7%, while West Texas Intermediate fell to $90.97 — modest retreats after Thursday's 4% surge, which had been fueled by reports that President Trump was weighing a strike on Iran before the November midterm elections. When Trump clarified that no such attack was imminent and that diplomatic talks were progressing, markets exhaled — if only partially.
The underlying tensions remained very much alive. The Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly a fifth of the world's oil once flowed freely, has become a dangerous passage since the conflict began eight months ago, with attacks on commercial shipping intensifying through the week. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi was said to be reviewing a US response to a proposal that could reopen the strait within seven days — a sliver of diplomatic possibility that traders were monitoring carefully.
At the same time, Washington imposed new sanctions Thursday on individuals, networks, and seventeen vessels tied to Iranian oil transport, making clear that economic pressure would continue alongside any negotiations. The dual-track approach — talking and squeezing simultaneously — left the market's longer-term outlook uncertain.
A separate crisis added to the week's volatility: Hurricane Isaias forced producers to shut in nearly 1.3 million barrels per day in the Gulf of Mexico, roughly 63% of regional output. For a market already stretched by geopolitical risk, the weather disruption was a reminder that supply shocks rarely arrive one at a time.
As the week closed, Brent was still positioned for a net gain while WTI edged slightly lower. The election calendar had bought a few weeks of reduced military risk — but with Iran's response pending, sanctions tightening, and shipping lanes still contested, the breathing room felt borrowed rather than earned.
Oil prices retreated on Friday as the immediate threat of military escalation in the Middle East receded. Brent crude fell 72 cents to settle at $103.53 a barrel—a 0.7% decline—while West Texas Intermediate dropped 52 cents to $90.97. The pullback came after President Donald Trump stated that the United States would not launch an attack on Iran before the November 3 midterm congressional elections, and indicated that productive diplomatic discussions were underway between the two countries.
The statement mattered because oil markets had been bracing for the opposite. Earlier in the week, media reports suggested Trump was considering military action against Iran before the elections, and that prospect had sent prices climbing. On Thursday alone, Brent crude had settled 4% higher, driven by a spike in attacks on commercial shipping carrying crude out of the Middle East. The Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly one-fifth of the world's oil and refined products flowed before the war began eight months ago, had become an increasingly dangerous corridor. Trump's reassurance that no strike was imminent provided enough relief to trim those gains, at least for a day.
Yet the broader picture remained unsettled. Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araqchi, according to the Tasnim news agency, was reviewing the American response to a proposal that would reopen the Strait of Hormuz within seven days. Simultaneously, the United States imposed fresh sanctions on Thursday targeting individuals, networks, and seventeen vessels involved in transporting Iranian crude, oil products, and petrochemicals. The economic pressure campaign continued even as diplomatic channels appeared to be functioning.
The oil market was also contending with a second major disruption unrelated to geopolitics. Hurricane Isaias was bearing down on the Gulf of Mexico, forcing producers to shut in approximately 1.3 million barrels per day—nearly 63% of current production in that region as of Thursday, according to the US Marine Minerals Administration. The Gulf of Mexico remains the world's largest oil-producing region, so the hurricane's impact was substantial.
When the week was tallied, Brent crude was positioned for gains despite Friday's decline, while West Texas Intermediate was tracking slightly lower. The volatility reflected the competing pressures: diplomatic signals that reduced the risk of immediate conflict, but persistent threats to shipping lanes and ongoing supply disruptions from weather. The market was waiting to see whether Iran's review of the American response would lead to a genuine de-escalation or whether the next few weeks would bring fresh shocks. For now, the election calendar had bought some breathing room.
Citas Notables
Washington was having productive discussions with Iran and no attack was planned before the November 3 midterm congressional elections— President Donald Trump, Thursday
Quieres la nota completa?
Lee el original en MarketScreener ↗
Politics & Governance