In the chambers of democratic accountability, the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption continues to examine whether the Liberal Party's internal factional warfare was financed by means the law expressly forbids. Shadow attorney general Damien Tudehope this week offered testimony that illuminated the blurred lines between political loyalty, personal generosity, and prohibited conduct — a reminder that the machinery of party politics often operates in spaces where legality and convenience are uncomfortable neighbours. The inquiry into Operation Rosny asks not merely whether rules were b
NSW Liberal questioned over branch stacking allegations as Icac inquiry intensifies
Not on your life would I expose a friend to that scrutiny
Why does it matter that Tudehope introduced O'Hara to the Reformers operatives if he disputes whether the payments were even illegal donations?
Because the inquiry is trying to establish knowledge and intent. If Tudehope knew O'Hara was prohibited from making political donations, and he knew the Reformers were recruiting members, and he introduced them anyway while knowing O'Hara was generous—that's a pattern that suggests he understood what was happening.
But Tudehope says he wouldn't have exposed his friend to that kind of scrutiny. Is that credible?
It's what he's claiming now. The inquiry has to weigh that against the evidence: the bank transfers, the messages, the fact that Ellis was fired after a newspaper article exposed the practice. The timing matters.
What does the 2018 message—"Scott and Damien are afraid"—actually tell us?
It suggests Perrottet and others knew there was risk in what they were doing. If they weren't worried about being caught, why would they be afraid? It's a window into how they understood the stakes.
Is Tudehope likely to be charged with anything?
The inquiry hasn't accused him of wrongdoing. But his testimony creates a record. Whether that becomes a basis for charges depends on what else the commission finds and how they interpret the Electoral Funding Act.
Why did Ellis get fired so quickly?
The newspaper article about staffers using ministerial hours for recruitment forced the issue. Tudehope's chief of staff reacted strongly enough that Ellis was terminated within weeks. That suggests the office understood it was a problem.
El Pulso
- A corruption inquiry is peeling back the inner workings of the NSW Liberal Party's Reformers faction, revealing a recruitment operation that may have been bankrolled by donors the law explicitly bars from political giving.
- Tudehope's own testimony placed him at the centre of the web — acknowledging payments to the faction, introducing a prohibited donor to its operatives, and employing key figures in his ministerial and electorate offices.
- A 2018 message suggesting senior Liberals were 'afraid' of the faction's activities surfaced in hearings, casting doubt on claims of ignorance and raising questions about how much was known and when.
- A retired businessman testified that Reformers operatives sought fifty thousand dollars to fund a call centre aimed at unseating a sitting Liberal MP — a request unusual enough that he walked away.
- The legal crux remains unresolved: whether payments to an unregistered internal faction constitute political donations under the Electoral Funding Act, a question with serious consequences for multiple senior figures.
- With Tudehope stood aside from shadow cabinet and the inquiry still in progress, the Liberal Party faces mounting pressure over governance standards and the conduct of its most powerful internal operators.
In the chambers of democratic accountability, the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption continues to examine whether the Liberal Party's internal factional warfare was financed by means the law expressly forbids. Shadow attorney general Damien Tudehope this week offered testimony that illuminated the blurred lines between political loyalty, personal generosity, and prohibited conduct — a reminder that the machinery of party politics often operates in spaces where legality and convenience are uncomfortable neighbours. The inquiry into Operation Rosny asks not merely whether rules were broken, but whether those entrusted with upholding the law understood, or chose to understand, where its boundaries lay.
The ICAC inquiry into branch stacking within the NSW Liberal Party sharpened its focus this week as Damien Tudehope, shadow attorney general and upper house leader, took the stand in Operation Rosny. Though not personally accused of wrongdoing, Tudehope has emerged as a recurring figure in testimony examining whether the Reformers — a conservative internal faction — used prohibited donations to fund membership recruitment.
Tudehope acknowledged that Jean-Claude Perrottet, younger brother of former premier Dominic Perrottet, had a genuine talent for mobilising people into the party — a skill he described as essential for surviving preselection. Perrottet had worked in Tudehope's electorate and parliamentary offices, and a 2018 message in which Perrottet told fellow Reformers that senior figures were 'afraid' emerged during testimony. Tudehope said he had no clear recollection of the concern, though his chief of staff later dismissed another Reformers operative, Christian Ellis, after a newspaper article exposed staffers using ministerial time for recruitment work.
Elsewhere in the hearings, retired businessman Frits Maré described being approached by Perrottet and Ellis in 2020 for fifty thousand dollars to fund a call centre aimed at unseating sitting MP Alex Hawke. He declined, finding the request unusual.
Tudehope admitted he may have made payments to the Reformers, including contributions toward a factional event, and acknowledged introducing Ellis and operative Robert Assaf to Michael O'Hara — a hotelier, former business partner, and known generous supporter. O'Hara is a prohibited donor under electoral law due to his ties to the liquor and gambling industries. When asked whether he would knowingly have exposed his elderly, seriously ill friend to the scrutiny O'Hara subsequently faced, Tudehope was unequivocal: 'Not on your life.'
Both Tudehope and O'Hara have disputed whether payments to an unregistered internal faction legally constitute political donations. That question — and what senior Liberals knew about the operation they were financing — remains at the heart of an inquiry that shows no sign of narrowing.
The Independent Commission Against Corruption's investigation into branch stacking within the NSW Liberal Party intensified this week as Damien Tudehope, the party's shadow attorney general and leader in the upper house, took the stand to answer questions about his connections to a factional operation that may have used illegal donations to recruit party members.
Tudehope, who has stepped back from his shadow cabinet duties while the inquiry proceeds, is not himself accused of wrongdoing. But his name has surfaced repeatedly during the first two weeks of hearings into Operation Rosny, which is examining whether the Reformers—a conservative faction within the Liberal Party—solicited or accepted prohibited donations to fund their membership recruitment efforts. Branch stacking itself is not illegal, but accepting donations to finance it is.
On Tuesday, Tudehope acknowledged that Jean-Claude Perrottet, the younger brother of former premier Dominic Perrottet, possessed a genuine "talent" for recruiting and renewing party members. Perrottet had worked in Tudehope's electorate office in 2018 and later in his parliamentary office when Tudehope served as finance minister. Tudehope described Perrottet as someone with "a fairly wide connection of friends, which he was able to marshal together and exploit"—then caught himself, softening the language. He said this ability to mobilize people was essential for any Liberal member hoping to survive preselection challenges.
When pressed about a 2018 message in which Perrottet wrote to fellow Reformers that "Scott and Damien are afraid," Tudehope said he did not recall being aware that Perrottet might have been using his hours as an electorate officer to recruit Liberal members. He acknowledged the message "may have potentially arisen" as a concern, but claimed no clear recollection. Later, his chief of staff had become upset enough about a newspaper article detailing staffers spending ministerial time on recruitment to trigger the dismissal of Christian Ellis, another Reformers operative, after just three months in Tudehope's ministerial office in July 2019.
The inquiry also heard testimony from Frits Maré, a retired businessman and Liberal Party member, who described a 2020 meeting in which Perrottet and Ellis approached him seeking fifty thousand dollars to fund a call centre operation. The goal, Maré said, was to sign up enough new Liberal members to challenge and unseat the sitting member for Mitchell, Alex Hawke. Maré found the request unusual and declined.
Tudehope admitted under questioning that he may have made payments to the Reformers, including what appeared to be contributions toward a venue and a five-thousand-dollar table at a factional event. He also acknowledged introducing Ellis and another Reformers operative, Robert Assaf, to Michael O'Hara, a hotelier and Tudehope's former business partner. Tudehope knew O'Hara was "generous" and likely to support their factional work financially. O'Hara, however, is a prohibited donor under electoral law because of his involvement in the liquor and gambling industries.
When counsel assisting the inquiry, Peggy Dwyer SC, pressed Tudehope on whether he would have knowingly exposed an eighty-three-year-old friend with stage four cancer to the scrutiny O'Hara had faced, Tudehope responded firmly: "Not on your life." Like O'Hara before him, Tudehope disputed whether payments to the Reformers—an unregistered party—would legally constitute political donations under the Electoral Funding Act. The inquiry continues, with the central question remaining whether senior Liberals facilitated prohibited donations to finance membership recruitment operations.
Citas Notables
Jean-Claude had a fairly wide connection of friends, which he was able to marshal together and exploit—or sort of get to do things for him.— Damien Tudehope, describing Jean-Claude Perrottet's recruitment abilities
I found it strange. I thought the sitting member was doing a good job in parliament.— Frits Maré, on being asked to fund a campaign to unseat Alex Hawke