In the autumn of 2021, a science fiction card game called Parallel secured $50 million from crypto venture firm Paradigm at a half-billion-dollar valuation — before a single hand had been played. The moment crystallizes a broader question haunting the NFT era: whether blockchain-based ownership can transcend speculation and become the substrate of genuine play. Paradigm's bet is not merely financial; it is a philosophical wager that the most enduring crypto games will be those that empower communities rather than extract from them.
TechCrunch
· Oct 21, 2021
· technology
· 2 min read
High
Sourcing: Verified
NFT card game Parallel raises $50M at $500M valuation from Paradigm
◉
Economy & Finance
4773 related articles
Wall Street Slides as AI Spending Concerns and $100 Oil Weigh on Marke…
Google News · 100% match
Indian Markets Poised for Weak Open as Geopolitical Tensions Weigh
The Hindu Business Line · 99% match
Nvidia's AI Surge Powers Global Stock Records as Bond Yields Rise
Devdiscourse · 99% match
Asian shares surge on chip rally as oil gains stoke inflation fears
The Economic Times · 99% match
Stock Markets Tumble as Strong Jobs Data Stokes Fed Rate Hike Fears
Devdiscourse · 99% match
Related Coverage
The Guardian · Jul 25
UK savers seize competitive moment as banks push rates to 8%
UK savers face a competitive market with banks offering up to 8% interest on regular savings accounts and 5% on easy-acc…
The Guardian · Jul 25 Paraquat herbicide pulled from Australian market after new safety restrictionsSyngenta will cease selling paraquat herbicide in Australia following new regulatory restrictions, citing commercial unv…
KuCoin · Jul 25 AI Video Market Splits Into Premium and Budget Tiers as Price War Reaches Computing Cost FloorAI video generation market fractures into competing strategies: ByteDance raises consumer prices while cutting B2B rates…
The Japan Times · Jul 25 Seven & i Abandons Poland Expansion Bid, Refocuses European StrategyJapan's Seven & i Holdings ended investment talks with Poland's Zabka Group, citing inability to reach mutually benefici…
Bias & Framing
⚖
Article exhibits moderate crypto-industry bias with dismissive language toward critics while presenting optimistic investor narratives uncritically.
Bias Direction
center-right
Confidence
HIGH
Legitimacy through association (major investors, YouTube co-founder) combined with dismissive framing of skeptics ('shill bad art to suckers'). Presents speculative metrics (transaction volume, single high-value sales) as indicators of sustainable value.
shill bad art to suckers
meteoric rise
caught fire
fervent early community
nailed the mechanics
earn the spoils
Skeptical analysis of NFT gaming sustainability beyond speculation
Voices questioning the $500M valuation rationale
Regulatory or consumer protection concerns
Failed NFT gaming projects or cautionary examples
Independent game developers' perspective on blockchain gaming viability
Analysis of whether transaction volume indicates actual gameplay adoption vs. speculation
Geopolitical Impact
🌎
This is a technology/finance story, not geopolitical. NFT gaming funding reflects crypto market dynamics but has no direct international relations, sovereignty, or power balance implications.
Escalation Risk
low
Confidence
HIGH
Not applicable - this concerns private sector technology investment within the crypto ecosystem, not state actors or international relations.
Economic Lens
📈
NFT gaming startup Parallel secures $50M funding at $500M valuation, reflecting speculative investor confidence in blockchain gaming despite volatile NFT market fundamentals.
Market Signal
mixed
Confidence
MED
Cryptocurrency and blockchain
Gaming and entertainment
Digital collectibles/NFTs
Venture capital and crypto VC
Art and digital assets
Consumers face high-risk speculative opportunities in NFT gaming with extreme price volatility (e.g., $1.1M card sales followed by 90% volume drops); potential for significant financial losses if treating NFTs as investments rather than entertainment.
Likely to trigger regulatory scrutiny around speculative crypto assets, consumer protection in digital markets, and potential classification of NFT gaming as gambling or securities depending on mechanics; may prompt SEC/FTC guidance on NFT disclosures and fraud prevention.