New Study Confirms Annual COVID Vaccines Reduce Severe Disease Risk Across All Ages

COVID vaccines prevented deaths and severe hospitalizations across the entire population studied, with particular impact on reducing mortality risk by 64%.
The vaccine works across all ages, even for those without risk factors
A new study challenges the assumption that younger, healthier people don't need annual COVID vaccination.
Mark

Why does a 64 percent reduction in death sound less dramatic than it should?

Mimi

Because we've grown numb to COVID numbers. But think about it differently: if you're vaccinated, your chance of dying from COVID is roughly one-third what it would be unvaccinated. That's not incremental. That's the difference between going home and not.

Mark

The study shows the vaccine works across all ages, but the CDC only recommends it for older people and those with chronic conditions. Why the gap?

Mimi

Policy lags behind evidence. The CDC was being cautious, probably trying to manage expectations and supply. But this study suggests caution may have cost lives among younger, healthier people who thought they didn't need it.

Mark

If only 21 percent of adults got vaccinated last year, does this study change anything?

Mimi

It should. But changing behavior is harder than publishing data. People have made up their minds. The study is ammunition for doctors and public health officials to use in conversations, but it won't reverse the trend overnight.

Mark

The vaccines are less effective now than they were in 2019. Doesn't that undermine the whole thing?

Mimi

No. It's actually expected. You can't get 94 percent protection in a population that's already been exposed to the virus multiple times. The question isn't whether vaccines are perfect—it's whether they're worth taking. At 64 percent protection against death, they clearly are.

Mark

What about the difference between Moderna and Pfizer's antibody response?

Mimi

Moderna's numbers look better on paper, but Perlman is right that it probably doesn't matter much in practice. Both vaccines will prevent severe disease. The difference is academic.

  • A 64% reduction in COVID deaths among vaccinated participants signals that the stakes of skipping the annual shot remain genuinely high, not merely precautionary.
  • Current CDC guidance limits its strongest recommendations to older adults and those with chronic conditions — but this study's data suggest that boundary may be leaving younger, healthier people unnecessarily exposed.
  • Vaccine effectiveness has declined from the 94% of the original shots to a range of 29–64%, yet researchers frame this not as failure but as the predictable evolution of immunity in a population that has encountered the virus repeatedly.
  • Early lab results for the 2025–2026 vaccines show strong antibody responses against the newer LP.8.1 variant, with Moderna producing an eightfold increase and Pfizer a fourfold increase in neutralizing antibodies.
  • With vaccination rates falling steadily and only 21% of U.S. adults participating last season, scientists warn that a less-immunized population means more people stand to benefit — and more stand to lose — this coming season.

Each year, the question of who needs protection from COVID quietly reshapes itself, and a new study in the New England Journal of Medicine offers a clarifying answer: nearly everyone. Tracking close to 300,000 Americans through the 2024–2025 vaccination season, researchers found that updated COVID vaccines reduced emergency visits by nearly a third, hospitalizations by two-fifths, and deaths by nearly two-thirds — benefits that held across every age group and health status examined. At a moment when only one in five American adults chose to be vaccinated last year, the findings ask a quiet but urgent question about the gap between what science demonstrates and what public behavior reflects.

A study published this week in the New England Journal of Medicine tracked nearly 300,000 Americans who received the 2024–2025 COVID vaccine, producing results that were both clear and consequential. Vaccinated individuals visited emergency rooms 29% less often, were hospitalized 39% less frequently, and died 64% less often than their unvaccinated counterparts. The protection held across every age group and among people with and without underlying health conditions — a finding that carries direct implications for how vaccination guidance is written.

The CDC currently recommends annual COVID vaccination primarily for adults 65 and older and for younger people with chronic illnesses. But the new data challenge that boundary. UCLA physician Nisha Viswanathan noted that the study calls into question the assumption that younger, healthier individuals don't need the vaccine. The shot offers its greatest protection to older and sicker people, but the evidence shows it also meaningfully protected those without obvious risk factors.

Vaccine effectiveness has fallen since the original formulas achieved 94% protection — the 2024–2025 shots ranged from 29 to 64%. Coronavirus researcher Stanley Perlman of the University of Iowa described this as expected: as populations accumulate immunity through infection and prior vaccination, the baseline shifts and vaccines perform differently. The virus has also evolved, though last year's and this year's vaccines both target variants close enough in character that researchers anticipate similar performance.

Manufacturers are already testing 2025–2026 formulas targeting a newer variant called LP.8.1. Early results show Moderna's updated vaccine producing an eightfold increase in neutralizing antibodies and Pfizer's a fourfold increase — both signals of strong immune response, though Perlman cautioned the gap is unlikely to translate into dramatically different real-world outcomes.

The findings land against a sobering backdrop: only 21% of American adults were vaccinated last year, a number that has been declining. Perlman observed that with fewer people carrying vaccine-induced immunity, the potential benefit of this season's shot is, if anything, larger. The vaccines may not prevent infection entirely, but the study reinforces what prior years have shown — they remain effective at preventing the outcomes that matter most.

A large study published this week in the New England Journal of Medicine offers fresh evidence that annual COVID vaccination works—and works across the board, regardless of how many times someone has been infected or vaccinated before.

Researchers tracked nearly 300,000 Americans who received the 2024–2025 COVID vaccine and measured what happened next. The numbers were straightforward: vaccinated people made 29 percent fewer emergency room visits for COVID, were hospitalized 39 percent less often, and died 64 percent less frequently than their unvaccinated counterparts. About a third of the study participants received Pfizer's vaccine; roughly two-thirds got Moderna's. The protection held steady across every age group examined and among people with and without chronic illnesses.

This finding matters partly because it challenges a narrower view of who needs the shot. The CDC currently recommends annual COVID vaccination for adults 65 and older and for younger people with underlying health conditions. The new data suggest that recommendation may be too limited. Nisha Viswanathan, an internal medicine physician at UCLA who studies long COVID, noted that the study "calls into question the idea that younger individuals and those without risk factors don't need the vaccine." While the vaccine does offer the most protection to older people and those already dealing with other diseases, she said, the evidence shows it also protected healthier, younger people—a detail that matters when deciding who should roll up their sleeve.

Scientists expected vaccine effectiveness to decline over time, and it has. The 2024–2025 shots offered 29 to 64 percent protection against symptomatic infection, a step down from the 94 percent the original vaccines provided in 2019. But that decline is normal, according to Stanley Perlman, a coronavirus researcher at the University of Iowa. As more people encounter the virus through infection or prior vaccination, their immune systems change, and vaccines naturally perform differently in a population with existing immunity. The virus itself has also evolved. Last year's vaccines and this year's both target variants descended from a single precursor strain called JN.1, and the two are similar enough in severity that researchers expect the current season's shots to perform much like last year's did.

Manufacturers have already begun testing the 2025–2026 vaccines, which target a newer variant called LP.8.1. Early lab work suggests both Pfizer and Moderna's updated formulas generate strong immune responses. Moderna's version produced an eightfold increase in neutralizing antibodies—the immune system's protective proteins—compared to baseline levels, while Pfizer's showed a fourfold increase. Perlman cautioned that the difference between the two is unlikely to translate into meaningfully better real-world protection for most people, though the higher antibody levels generally signal stronger defense against severe disease.

One striking fact underscores why these findings matter: only 21 percent of American adults received a COVID vaccine last year, a proportion that has been falling steadily. Perlman observed that with fewer people carrying vaccine-induced immunity, more people would benefit from getting vaccinated this season. The study's authors declined to comment on their findings, but the research aligns with what scientists have observed in previous years—that while COVID vaccines may not stop infection entirely, they remain effective at preventing the outcomes that matter most: the ones that land people in hospitals or morgues.

The vaccine is efficacious, particularly against severe disease
— Stanley Perlman, coronavirus researcher, University of Iowa
The data show that while the shot is most effective for older individuals and those with comorbidities, it was also protective in those without risk factors
— Nisha Viswanathan, internal medicine doctor, UCLA Long COVID program
Fale Conosco FAQ