Netflix's Apex fuels Hollywood's obsession with Australia's deadly outback

The most dangerous creatures in the outback wear human skin
A theme that runs through fifty years of Australian cinema, from Rabbit-Proof Fence to Apex.
Mark

So Apex is just the latest in a long line of films using the outback as this kind of moral testing ground?

Mimi

That's one way to see it. But what's interesting is how consistent the message is across fifty years of cinema. The outback isn't dangerous because of what lives there—it's dangerous because of what people do.

Luke

Though I'd push back a bit. The source says the outback "has found favour" in both Hollywood and Australian films, but it doesn't really explain why. Is it just the landscape, or is there something about Australia's actual history that makes it compelling?

Mimi

That's fair. The films that work best—Wake in Fright, Picnic at Hanging Rock, Evil Angels—they're dealing with real Australian anxieties. Isolation, the frontier, the relationship with Indigenous people, the gap between what the law says and what actually happens.

Mark

And Apex fits that pattern even though it was originally set in America?

Mimi

Yes, but the director chose Australia for practical reasons—he needed a warm climate at a specific time. So it's not like he was drawn to the outback's mythology. He just needed the location.

Luke

Which is worth noting. We don't actually know if Apex engages with any of those deeper themes the other films do. We know it's about a woman and a serial killer. That could be anywhere.

Mark

So the outback is becoming just a backdrop? A place that looks good on screen?

Mimi

Maybe. Or maybe it's both—a practical location that also carries cultural weight. The fact that it's the outback matters to the viewer even if it didn't matter to the director's original vision.

Luke

The source doesn't tell us whether audiences are drawn to Apex because of the setting or despite it. That's a real gap in understanding what this "obsession" actually is.

  • Netflix's Apex exploded onto global screens, accumulating 2.54 billion minutes of viewing and claiming the top spot on the platform's worldwide English-language chart within weeks of release.
  • The film's director originally conceived the story for an American setting, but a logistical need for warmth redirected the production to Australia — a shift that inadvertently tapped into one of cinema's most potent and recurring anxieties.
  • From Wolf Creek's torture-inflected horror to Wake in Fright's psychological unravelling, a lineage of films has made the outback synonymous with human cruelty rather than natural danger, and some — like Wolf Creek — may have genuinely frightened tourists away from the country.
  • Beneath the genre variety — thriller, horror, historical drama, revisionist Western — a single conviction holds: isolation does not create monsters so much as it reveals them, stripping away the social contracts that ordinarily keep violence in check.
  • The appetite for these stories, measured in billions of streaming minutes and decades of cultural staying power, shows no sign of fading — suggesting the outback continues to function as a mirror for anxieties that are anything but uniquely Australian.

For decades, filmmakers from around the world have returned to Australia's outback not merely for its vast and punishing landscape, but for what that landscape permits human beings to become. From Peter Weir's unexplained vanishings to Greg McLean's brutal predators, cinema has long understood that the red interior of a continent is most terrifying when it strips away the conventions that keep people civil. Netflix's Apex — watched for 2.54 billion minutes and counting — is only the latest chapter in a story that has been told since at least 1971: in the outback, the most dangerous animal is always the one that walks upright.

When Netflix's Apex landed in late April, it moved through the platform like a weather event. Within weeks the action thriller — starring Charlize Theron as a grieving woman hunted by a serial killer across the Australian wilderness, alongside Eric Bana and Taron Egerton — had logged 2.54 billion minutes of viewing and reached number one on the Global Top 10 English movies list. Director Baltasar Kormákur had originally written the script with America in mind; the move to Australia was a practical one, driven by climate and scheduling. But the choice landed with a kind of cultural inevitability, because the outback has long been cinema's preferred stage for a very specific kind of dread.

The pattern runs deep. Wake in Fright, from 1971 and frequently named the greatest Australian film ever made, follows a city schoolteacher who stops overnight in a remote town and loses himself entirely — to gambling, to the locals, to his own suppressed nature. Picnic at Hanging Rock, Peter Weir's 1975 masterpiece, offers four schoolgirls who vanish during an outing and no explanation whatsoever; the mystery was never resolved even in the source novel. Wolf Creek, released in 2004 and drawing on the real crimes of Ivan Milat and Bradley Murdoch, proved so viscerally effective that it is said to have discouraged international tourists more than any other single film.

Not all the danger is human in origin — Razorback's marauding wild pig and the dingo at the centre of Evil Angels, based on the Chamberlain case at Uluru, remind audiences that the landscape itself is indifferent to survival. Walkabout sends two English children in school uniforms into the wilderness until an Indigenous man guides them out. Rabbit-Proof Fence opens a window onto the Stolen Generations and the violence of colonial administration. Quigley Down Under and Road Games each import American stars into a landscape that quickly makes clear the rules of civilisation do not apply.

What holds all of these films together is a shared and quietly disturbing argument: the outback's most dangerous element is not heat, distance, or wildlife, but what human beings permit themselves to become when the structures of society fall away. The landscape is the condition; the horror is always the people. That Apex drew 2.54 billion minutes of attention suggests the world's appetite for that particular truth remains, for now, insatiable.

Netflix's Apex arrived in late April and moved through the streaming service like a dust storm. Within weeks, the film had accumulated 2.54 billion minutes of viewing time and claimed the number one spot on Netflix's Global Top 10 English movies list. The action thriller, starring Charlize Theron alongside Welsh actor Taron Egerton and Australian Eric Bana, tells the story of a woman grieving in the wilderness who becomes trapped in a predatory game with a serial killer. It is, by any measure, a major hit. Yet what makes Apex notable is not merely its viewership but what it represents: the latest evidence of Hollywood's deepening fascination with Australia's outback as a setting for stories about danger, isolation, and the particular terror that comes from other people.

Director Baltasar Kormákur originally wrote the script with an American setting in mind. The shift to Australia came down to practical necessity—the production needed a warm climate at a specific time of year. But the choice reveals something deeper about how filmmakers now think about the Australian landscape. The outback has become a character itself, a place where the wilderness is less threatening than what humans do within it. This is not new. The pattern runs through decades of cinema, from international productions to homegrown Australian films, across genres from horror to revisionist Westerns to historical drama.

Take Rabbit-Proof Fence, released in 2002, which opened many viewers' eyes to the Stolen Generations and the machinery of state power that separated Indigenous children from their families. Or Road Games from 1981, where director Richard Franklin drew inspiration from Hitchcock's Rear Window to craft a cross-country thriller featuring American stars Stacy Keach and Jamie Lee Curtis encountering a serial killer on the long stretch across the Nullarbor. In Quigley Down Under, Tom Selleck's character confronts a landowner played by Alan Rickman who has hired a gunman to exterminate the local Indigenous population. The message is consistent: the most dangerous creatures in the outback wear human skin.

The landscape itself has starred in stranger stories. Razorback, a 1984 film by Russell Mulcahy, centers on a wild pig terrorizing the region—a creature so absurd and over-the-top that it becomes almost funny, shot with visual flair by future Oscar-winner Dean Semler. Walkabout, Nicolas Roeg's 1971 film, follows two English children wandering the outback in school uniforms until rescued by an Indigenous man in his film debut. Evil Angels, based on the Chamberlain case from 1980 when a dingo took a baby at Uluru, became one of Australia's most famous legal stories, transformed into cinema by director Fred Schepisi. Picnic at Hanging Rock, Peter Weir's 1975 masterpiece, offers no explanation for why four schoolgirls vanish during an outing—the mystery remains unsolved even in the novel's later chapters.

But the films that have most shaped the world's anxiety about the Australian outback are the ones that weaponize human violence. Wolf Creek, released in 2004 and inspired partly by real killers Ivan Milat and Bradley Murdoch, became so effective at depicting brutality that it may have deterred tourists from visiting Australia more than any other film. John Jarratt's character, Mick Taylor, became legendary—though the film itself, with its graphic depiction of suffering, reads as torture cinema. Wake in Fright, from 1971 and often called the greatest Australian film ever made, tells of a city teacher at an isolated outback school who stays overnight in a town resembling Broken Hill, hoping to win enough at a two-up game to escape his contract. Instead, he confronts his own demons and the locals who introduce him to the outback's horrors, including a notorious kangaroo shoot. The film was retitled Outback for international release.

What connects these films—from Burke & Wills, the 1985 account of two ill-prepared explorers who died of thirst crossing the continent, to Apex's contemporary thriller—is a shared conviction that the outback reveals something true about human nature. The landscape is vast and unforgiving, yes. But the real danger emerges from what people do to each other when civilization falls away. This is the obsession that keeps drawing filmmakers back: not the wildlife or the heat or the distance, but the question of what happens when humans are left alone with their worst impulses. Apex, with its 2.54 billion minutes watched, suggests that appetite shows no sign of diminishing.

The film was actually set in the United States in the script, but they needed a warm climate at a specific time of year.
— Director Baltasar Kormákur, on why Apex was relocated to Australia
Contact Us FAQ