At a Warsaw security conference, NATO's Supreme Commander prepares to deliver a carefully calibrated message to Moscow — one that is as much about reassurance as it is about resolve. General Alexus Grynkewich's 'theory of victory' arrives at a moment when Russia's shadow war of sabotage is testing the alliance's patience, and when America's own commitment to European defense has become an open question. The gathering of allies in Poland reflects an old truth: that deterrence is never purely military — it is also a performance of unity, and unity is precisely what is now most fragile.
NATO commander to warn Russia of alliance's readiness to counter any attack
NATO is the stronger force, but Europe is bracing for American hesitation.
Mark
So Grynkewich is going to Warsaw to basically tell Russia, "We're ready for you." But what does that actually mean? Is he going to say how NATO would fight?
Mimi
No, that's the thing — NATO keeps those details locked down. The speech is more about signaling. It's meant to reassure the eastern members and warn Moscow that NATO has thought this through.
Luke
But here's what we don't know: what exactly is in this "theory of victory"? We're getting the framing from a spokesman, not the actual strategy. And we don't know if it's new or if it's just repackaging existing plans.
Mimi
Fair point. The real news is that NATO is trying to look unified and strong right now, because there's genuine worry about Russian hybrid attacks — the drones, the sabotage. That's concrete.
Mark
These hybrid attacks — are they actually getting worse, or does it just feel that way because people are paying attention now?
Luke
The source says Western officials report they're escalating, but we're not seeing independent verification of that. We know about the drone at the German airport. Beyond that, it's mostly attribution to unnamed officials.
Mimi
But the concern is real among NATO members. And the timing is real — Russia is stuck in Ukraine, so the theory goes that it's lashing out in other ways.
Mark
And then there's the Trump question hanging over everything.
Luke
Exactly. The Pentagon is reviewing troop levels in Europe, results due by year's end. That's a concrete fact. But we don't know what the review will recommend. European countries are already spooked and spending more on defense, which is measurable. But the actual U.S. commitment — that's still in flux.
Mimi
So Grynkewich's message about NATO being strong and ready — it lands differently when people are wondering if America will actually show up.
Mark
Is NATO equipped to handle these gray-zone attacks? The sabotage, the interference — that's not traditional warfare.
Luke
The source says NATO has "struggled to work out how to cope" with that. So the honest answer is: not really, not yet. That's the real vulnerability.
O Pulso
- Russia's hybrid campaign — drones at German airports, covert sabotage, gray-zone provocations — is edging closer to the kind of incident that could cost lives and demand a formal response.
- NATO's eastern members, living in Russia's geographic shadow, are watching Washington with as much anxiety as they watch Moscow.
- General Grynkewich's Warsaw address is designed to serve two nervous audiences simultaneously: the Kremlin, which must be warned, and allied governments, which must be steadied.
- European nations are accelerating military buildups, racing to reduce dependence on American forces before a potential US troop drawdown is announced later this year.
- The alliance projects strength outward while quietly absorbing the destabilizing uncertainty of Trump-era US foreign policy from within.
At a Warsaw security conference, NATO's Supreme Commander prepares to deliver a carefully calibrated message to Moscow — one that is as much about reassurance as it is about resolve. General Alexus Grynkewich's 'theory of victory' arrives at a moment when Russia's shadow war of sabotage is testing the alliance's patience, and when America's own commitment to European defense has become an open question. The gathering of allies in Poland reflects an old truth: that deterrence is never purely military — it is also a performance of unity, and unity is precisely what is now most fragile.
NATO's top military commander is traveling to Warsaw this week carrying a message aimed squarely at Moscow: the alliance has a plan, it is ready, and it is not bluffing. General Alexus Grynkewich will present what his office calls a 'theory of victory' — a framework for deterring Russian aggression and, if deterrence fails, for winning the fight that follows.
The backdrop is a Russian hybrid campaign that Western officials say has been quietly escalating against NATO members supporting Ukraine. Sabotage operations, interference, and incidents like an explosive-laden drone discovered at a German airport have raised fears that Moscow, frustrated by its stalled war in Ukraine, is growing more reckless — and that someone could eventually get killed.
Grynkewich's speech is unlikely to reveal classified strategy. NATO has never advertised how it would actually fight. The point is the signal itself — to remind the Kremlin that the alliance has thought this through, and to reassure Poland, the Baltic states, and other eastern members that they will not be abandoned.
NATO's civilian chief Mark Rutte has urged allies to hold their nerve, insisting the alliance remains the stronger force. But a deeper anxiety runs beneath the surface. The United States is reviewing its troop presence in Europe, with results expected before year's end, and President Trump has repeatedly cast doubt on America's commitment to collective defense. European governments are now rushing to build independent military capacity — not because Russia has moved, but because Washington has grown uncertain.
The sharpest irony of the Warsaw moment is this: as NATO works to project unity and resolve toward Russia, its most powerful member is the source of its most unsettling vulnerability.
NATO's Supreme Commander is heading to Warsaw this week with a message meant for Moscow: the alliance knows how to fight back, and it's ready. General Alexus Grynkewich, the top military officer in the alliance, will lay out what his office calls a "theory of victory" — a framework for how NATO would respond if Russia attacked, and how it plans to deter that attack from happening in the first place.
The timing matters. Western officials say Russia has been running what they describe as a "hybrid" campaign against NATO members who are backing Ukraine in the war — a mix of sabotage, interference, and other operations that fall short of outright military action. The incidents have become harder to ignore. A drone loaded with explosives was found at a German airport. There have been other high-profile discoveries. The worry in NATO capitals is that Moscow, frustrated by its stalled offensive in Ukraine, is becoming more reckless with these operations, and that people could die.
Colonel Martin O'Donnell, a spokesman for Grynkewich, described the theory of victory in stark terms last week. The core idea is simple: NATO keeps its edge. The alliance maintains the military advantage it has built through its deterrence and defense plans. But the world is messy and unpredictable now, O'Donnell said, so NATO needs to be ready to deter aggression before it starts, and to win if it comes to a fight. The theory, he suggested, gives the alliance a roadmap for doing both.
NATO was built after World War II specifically to counter the Soviet threat, and it has always kept its defense plans close to the chest. Grynkewich's speech in Warsaw is unlikely to reveal much new strategy — the alliance doesn't advertise how it would actually fight Russia. Instead, the move serves two audiences at once. One is the Kremlin: a signal that NATO has thought this through and is not bluffing. The other is the nervous members on NATO's eastern edge — Poland, the Baltics, and others who live closest to Russian territory. They need to hear that the alliance will protect them.
NATO's civilian leader, Mark Rutte, has tried to strike a balance between vigilance and calm. He has told member countries not to be naive about Russia, but also to remember that NATO is the stronger force. "We should not be naive about Russia, but they know we are stronger," Rutte said last month. He has urged allies to stay steady and keep supporting Ukraine.
But there is a shadow over all of this. The United States is reviewing how many troops it keeps in Europe, and the results will come out toward the end of the year. European countries are already worried that those numbers could shrink. President Donald Trump has raised questions about whether the U.S. will stay committed to defending Europe, and that uncertainty has spooked allied governments. They are now racing to build up their own militaries, trying to reduce how much they depend on American forces. The irony is sharp: just as NATO is trying to look unified and strong against Russia, its most powerful member is under new leadership that has cast doubt on the alliance's future. Grynkewich's message to Moscow will land in a Europe that is bracing for a different kind of vulnerability — not from Russian tanks, but from American hesitation.
Citações Notáveis
We should not be naive about Russia, but they know we are stronger.— Mark Rutte, NATO civilian head
NATO needs to set conditions now to deter aggression and, if necessary, win if attacked.— Colonel Martin O'Donnell, spokesman for General Grynkewich
Quer a matéria completa?
Leia o original em AFP.com ↗
War & Conflict