National Treasure 3 Director Says Political Climate Will Shape Upcoming Sequel

We have to include that idea somehow without making someone feel put off
Turteltaub on the challenge of weaving political division into the third film's narrative.
Mark

Why did it take nineteen years to make this third film? That's not a normal gap for a franchise.

Mimi

Turteltaub pointed to the political climate. He said the country became so divided that even a movie about American history and patriotism became something people couldn't agree on. Democrats and Republicans started viewing the franchise through completely different lenses.

Mark

That's striking. What exactly did he mean by that?

Mimi

He gave an example: Kevin McCarthy was surprised Democrats had made the original film at all. There's this assumption now that patriotism belongs to one side. Meanwhile, each side has harsh caricatures of the other. That toxicity made it hard to develop a story that felt honest.

Mark

So the new film is going to address politics directly?

Mimi

Not directly, exactly. Turteltaub said they have to include the idea of political division somehow, but carefully. They want to acknowledge the chasm without making people feel attacked or excluded.

Mark

That sounds nearly impossible.

Mimi

It does. He's essentially saying: we can't pretend the division doesn't exist, but we also can't let it destroy the movie. It's threading a needle that might not have a thread.

Mark

What did critics say about this approach?

Mimi

Mixed. Some saw it as a sign of how fractured things have become—that a historical adventure film is now seen as politically fraught. Others thought if he could pull it off, it might be the best film in the franchise.

Mark

And production? When does it actually start?

Mimi

That's the Hollywood part. He joked that things could still fall apart. A bus accident, scheduling conflicts, studio decisions—nothing is guaranteed until it's actually filmed.

  • After 19 years of false starts, Turteltaub confirmed the script is approved and the franchise is moving — but Hollywood's 'real' is not the same as certain.
  • The director revealed that political polarization, not creative drought, was the true obstacle: both parties had claimed patriotism as their exclusive property, leaving little common ground for a film built on shared national mythology.
  • A conversation with former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy laid bare the fracture — the assumption that a patriotic film couldn't possibly come from the other side of the aisle.
  • Turteltaub now faces a razor-thin creative challenge: weave contemporary political tensions into a historical adventure without triggering the very divisions he's trying to bridge.
  • Film critic Christian Toto warned that the mere need to thread a political needle signals cultural fracture — yet conceded that success could make this the franchise's finest entry.

Nearly two decades after its last installment, the 'National Treasure' franchise is inching toward revival — not merely delayed by Hollywood logistics, but by something more revealing: a nation that can no longer agree on what patriotism means. Director Jon Turteltaub, speaking in Philadelphia, confirmed a finished script and Disney's approval, while candidly acknowledging that the country's deepening political fractures made it nearly impossible to tell a story about shared American identity. The film's long silence, it turns out, was less a production problem than a cultural one.

Jon Turteltaub arrived in Philadelphia last Friday with long-awaited news: 'National Treasure 3' is officially moving forward, with Disney having approved a completed script. The director, who led the franchise's first two films in 2004 and 2007, made the announcement during a podcast recording — though he was careful to remind the audience that in Hollywood, certainty only arrives when cameras are rolling.

What gave the announcement its real weight wasn't the confirmation itself, but Turteltaub's explanation for the nearly two-decade gap. He pointed to the country's political polarization as a central obstacle. A conversation with former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy illustrated the problem vividly: McCarthy was genuinely puzzled that Democrats had made the original film, as though patriotism were a partisan inheritance. Democrats, Turteltaub observed, carried their own distortions of the other side. The franchise had stalled, in part, because the nation had lost a shared language for what loving one's country even looks like.

The third film, Turteltaub made clear, cannot sidestep this reality. It will need to engage with contemporary political tensions while telling a story about American history and adventure — without alienating the broad audience the franchise depends on. It is, as he framed it, a balance that must be attempted even if it cannot be guaranteed.

Film critic Christian Toto offered a measured response: reviving a nostalgic franchise makes commercial sense, but he found it troubling that a film rooted in American history required such careful political navigation at all. The need to thread that needle, he suggested, is itself a symptom of how fractured the culture has become. Still, he allowed that if Turteltaub pulls it off, the result could be the strongest 'National Treasure' yet. Disney has not commented, and the path from approved script to finished film remains, as ever in Hollywood, uncertain.

Jon Turteltaub stood in front of a Philadelphia audience last Friday with news that felt overdue: "National Treasure 3" is finally happening. The director, who helmed the first two films in 2004 and 2007, confirmed during a live recording of the "National Treasure Hunt" podcast that Disney has approved a finished script. After nearly two decades of false starts and industry whispers, the Nicolas Cage-led franchise is moving toward production—though Turteltaub was careful to note that in Hollywood, nothing is truly certain until cameras roll.

What made the announcement noteworthy wasn't just the confirmation itself, but what Turteltaub said about why it took so long. The director attributed the delay, in part, to the country's deepening political divisions. He recounted a conversation with former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy that crystallized the problem: McCarthy and others were baffled that Democrats had made the original film at all, operating from the assumption that patriotism was a Republican possession. Meanwhile, Turteltaub observed, Democrats had their own caricatures—that Republicans wanted to hoard resources and harbor contempt for everyone else. The gap between the second and third films, he suggested, reflected a nation increasingly unable to agree on what patriotism even meant.

The real challenge, Turteltaub explained, is that the new film cannot simply ignore this reality. "We have to be very careful, but I don't feel we are allowed to ignore it," he said. The third installment will need to weave contemporary political tensions into its narrative about American history and treasure hunting, all while avoiding the trap of alienating half the potential audience. It's a delicate calculation: acknowledge the chasm without widening it.

Turteltaub offered few specifics about the story itself, and he tempered expectations with characteristic Hollywood candor. "Now, it's Hollywood real, meaning things could happen," he said, joking that a bus accident involving either himself or Cage could derail everything. The franchise has been in development limbo for years, with Turteltaub and producer Jerry Bruckheimer periodically hinting at progress without delivering concrete results.

Film critic Christian Toto, founder of Hollywood in Toto, saw both promise and peril in Turteltaub's comments. He acknowledged that reviving older franchises for nostalgic appeal makes commercial sense, but he expressed concern about the politicization of a historical adventure film. Toto suggested that a franchise centered on American history shouldn't be controversial in the first place—that the need to thread a political needle was itself a symptom of cultural fracture. Yet he also noted that if Turteltaub could pull off the balance, it might produce the strongest film in the series.

Disney did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the project. What remains unclear is whether the studio will greenlight production, when filming might begin, and how exactly Turteltaub plans to weave political themes into a story about hunting for historical artifacts. The director has signaled his intention to try, but the execution—and whether audiences on both sides of the political divide will accept it—remains an open question.

We have to be very careful, but I don't feel we are allowed to ignore it. I think we have to include that idea in the story somehow without making someone feel put off.
— Jon Turteltaub, director
It's actually a sad sign of the times—a franchise about U.S. history is now seen as problematic or challenging, when it should be nothing of the kind.
— Christian Toto, film critic
Quer a matéria completa? Leia o original em Fox News ↗
Fale Conosco FAQ