In the highlands and river valleys of Myanmar, war has become inseparable from commerce — armed factions and the military junta alike have discovered that controlling the earth beneath the fighting is as consequential as controlling the fighting itself. A documented 'conflict economy' now binds illegal mineral extraction to sustained military violence, creating a self-reinforcing cycle in which jade, rubies, and tin fund the very weapons that secure their extraction. Civilians living above these mineral deposits bear the compounded weight of airstrikes, forced displacement, and exploitation, c
Myanmar's Conflict Economy: Illegal Mining Fuels Violence as Military Targets Civilians
Civilians face ongoing abuse, displacement, and death from airstrikes conducted by military forces and armed groups operating in mineral-rich conflict zones.
Violence secures the mines, the mines fund the violence.
Mark
Why does the military bother with mining when it's already in control of the state?
Mimi
Because controlling a state doesn't guarantee revenue. International sanctions have crippled formal government finances. Mining offers immediate, tangible income—cash that doesn't require approval from anyone, that flows directly to whoever controls the territory.
Mark
So the armed groups opposing the junta are doing the same thing?
Mimi
Exactly. Both sides discovered the same solution to the same problem: you need money to wage war, and minerals are money. It's created a perverse alignment of interests. The junta and its opponents are competitors in violence but partners in extraction.
Mark
What happens to the people living there?
Mimi
They become obstacles or resources, depending on the moment. If you're in the way of a mine, you're cleared. If you're able-bodied, you might be forced to work. If you're neither useful nor easily moved, you're at risk from airstrikes meant for armed groups nearby.
Mark
Can this be stopped?
Mimi
Only if the minerals stop being profitable or if someone makes the cost of extraction higher than the revenue it generates. Right now, the incentive structure is perfectly aligned toward continued violence. The minerals flow out, the money flows in, and the war continues.
Mark
Who's buying these minerals?
Mimi
That's the obscured part. They enter global supply chains with minimal tracking. A phone, a piece of jewelry, industrial equipment—any of it could contain material extracted under conditions of systematic abuse. Most buyers have no idea.
Mark
Does that matter to the people being harmed?
Mimi
Not in the immediate sense. But it means there's leverage that isn't being used. If the minerals couldn't be sold, the mining would stop. If the mining stopped, one major engine of the violence would shut down.
El Pulso
- Illegal mining operations across Myanmar's mineral-rich zones continue without pause even as military airstrikes fall on nearby villages, revealing that extraction and destruction are not competing forces but coordinated ones.
- Both the military junta and the armed groups opposing it have converged on the same model: seize the minerals, sell them across borders, and reinvest the profits into weapons — a closed loop that makes peace economically inconvenient for all armed parties.
- Civilians face a layered catastrophe — bombed when they are near armed group positions, displaced when mining operations expand, and sometimes forced into the mines themselves, their land treated as inventory rather than home.
- International sanctions exist on paper, but Myanmar's conflict minerals continue to move through global supply chains into electronics, jewelry, and industrial goods, sustaining the financial incentive that keeps the violence alive.
- Analysts warn that without targeted disruption of the revenue streams flowing from illegal extraction, no political negotiation or military intervention will be sufficient to break the cycle — the economy of the conflict must be addressed as directly as the conflict itself.
In the highlands and river valleys of Myanmar, war has become inseparable from commerce — armed factions and the military junta alike have discovered that controlling the earth beneath the fighting is as consequential as controlling the fighting itself. A documented 'conflict economy' now binds illegal mineral extraction to sustained military violence, creating a self-reinforcing cycle in which jade, rubies, and tin fund the very weapons that secure their extraction. Civilians living above these mineral deposits bear the compounded weight of airstrikes, forced displacement, and exploitation, caught not merely in a war but in an industrial system that requires their suffering to function. Until the economic architecture sustaining this violence is dismantled alongside the violence itself, Myanmar's instability will remain structurally immune to resolution.
In Myanmar's mountains and river valleys, a machinery of destruction has taken hold that is as much economic as it is military. Armed groups and the junta are not merely fighting over territory — they are systematically extracting jade, rubies, tin, and other minerals from the earth while terrorizing the civilians who live above it. A new report documents how this conflict economy has become the engine of ongoing violence, with illegal mining generating the revenue that sustains both sides of the war.
The logic is brutally circular. Violence secures the mines, the mines fund the violence. Military operations have grown more aggressive in mineral-rich regions, with documented abuse tied directly to extraction zones. Civilians face airstrikes, forced displacement, and in some cases conscription into the mines themselves. Their land is not a place to inhabit — it is a resource to be liquidated.
What distinguishes Myanmar's situation is the simultaneity of it all. The junta uses military force to protect mining operations; armed groups opposing the junta have adopted the identical model. Controlling minerals has become as strategically vital as controlling territory, and both sides are willing to inflict whatever violence is necessary to maintain that control.
The international response has been inadequate. Sanctions exist but enforcement is inconsistent, and Myanmar's conflict minerals continue to flow into global supply chains with minimal scrutiny. The economic incentive to keep mining — and to keep fighting for the right to mine — remains intact.
For civilians, there is no visible exit. The report's conclusion is stark: addressing Myanmar's instability requires a direct assault on the economic structures sustaining the conflict. Without making illegal extraction costly, without disrupting the revenue that arms both sides, the cycle will only deepen. The minerals will keep coming out of the ground, and civilians will keep paying the price.
In the mountains and river valleys of Myanmar, a peculiar machinery of destruction has taken hold. Armed groups and military forces are not simply fighting for territory or ideology—they are systematically extracting minerals from the earth while simultaneously terrorizing the civilians who live above it. A new report documents how this 'conflict economy' has become the engine of ongoing violence, with illegal mining operations generating the revenue that sustains both the junta's military apparatus and the armed groups challenging its control.
The scale is difficult to overstate. Across mineral-rich zones, mining operations continue uninterrupted even as airstrikes rain down on nearby villages. The military and various armed factions have discovered that controlling territory means controlling access to jade, rubies, tin, and other valuable minerals. These resources are extracted, sold across borders, and the profits flow back into weapons, ammunition, and the machinery of war. It is a closed loop: violence secures the mines, the mines fund the violence.
What makes this arrangement particularly brutal is its indifference to civilian life. People living in areas where mining is concentrated face a compounded threat. They endure airstrikes conducted by military forces seeking to eliminate rival armed groups. They witness the displacement of entire communities as mining operations expand. They watch their land become a resource to be liquidated rather than a place to live. The violence is not incidental to the mining—it is integral to it. Armed groups use force to clear populations, secure supply routes, and prevent interference with extraction operations.
The report details how this system has intensified in recent months. Military operations have grown more aggressive in mineral-rich regions, with documented cases of abuse linked directly to resource extraction zones. Civilians caught between competing armed factions face not only the threat of combat but also systematic exploitation. Some are forced to work in mines. Others are displaced to make room for operations. Still others are killed in airstrikes that target armed group positions near populated areas.
What distinguishes Myanmar's conflict from other resource-driven wars is the simultaneity of it all. The junta is not simply using mining revenue to fund a broader military agenda—it is using military force to protect and expand mining operations. Armed groups opposing the junta have adopted the same model. Both sides have realized that controlling minerals is as important as controlling territory, and they are willing to inflict whatever violence is necessary to maintain that control.
The international response has been muted. Sanctions exist, but enforcement is inconsistent. The minerals extracted from Myanmar's conflict zones flow into global supply chains with minimal scrutiny. Electronics manufacturers, jewelry makers, and industrial producers may unknowingly be purchasing materials extracted under conditions of systematic abuse. The economic incentive to continue mining—and the violence that protects it—remains strong.
For civilians in these zones, the situation appears to have no exit. As long as minerals remain valuable and armed groups remain willing to fight for control of them, the violence will persist. The report suggests that addressing Myanmar's instability requires not only military intervention or political negotiation but a direct assault on the economic structures sustaining the conflict. Without disrupting the flow of revenue from illegal mining, without making it costly for armed groups to continue extraction, the cycle of violence will deepen. The minerals will keep coming out of the ground, and the civilians will keep paying the price.
Citas Notables
A thriving 'conflict economy' is extracting minerals while the military and armed groups inflict abuse on civilians— New report on Myanmar's recent violence
Quieres la nota completa?
Lee el original en The New York Times ↗
War & Conflict