Modi's AI ambitions clash with Indian residents opposing data centre expansion

Residents face displacement concerns, health risks from noise pollution particularly affecting children and elderly, and property value depreciation in affected neighbourhoods.
If the data centre stops, we will stay. If it goes ahead, we will move.
A 62-year-old resident near Amazon's Mumbai facility expresses the choice facing thousands in affected neighbourhoods.
Mark

So Modi wants India to become the AI infrastructure hub for the world. That's a real pivot from India's traditional role in software services. What's the actual strategy here?

Mimi

He's betting that if India can't build the frontier models that OpenAI and Chinese labs are building, it can own the physical layer instead. The servers, the cooling systems, the power grids—all the unglamorous machinery that actually runs AI. Amazon, Google, Microsoft are pouring tens of billions into data centres across the country.

Luke

But here's the thing—that strategy only works if you have the resources to support it. And India doesn't. Four percent of the world's freshwater for 18 percent of the population. That's not a minor constraint.

Mark

So the residents near Mumbai who are protesting—they're not just complaining about noise and construction. They're worried about actual scarcity.

Mimi

Exactly. A woman named Vasudha Shetty bought a flat near the Amazon site expecting a quiet retirement. Now she's saying if the data centre goes ahead, she'll move. Hundreds of others are doing the same. And the water projections are stark—data centres used 150 billion litres in 2025. That's expected to more than double by 2030.

Luke

Though I should note—Amazon says they're using water-free cooling and dedicated power sources, so they're not drawing from the public grid. The question is whether that's technically true and whether it actually matters if the broader region is already water-stressed.

Mark

What does Modi's government say about all this?

Mimi

They're defending it as necessary infrastructure for India's digital future. Calling data centres "invisible engines powering India's digital life." But they haven't really engaged with the residents' concerns directly. The ministries didn't even respond to requests for comment.

Luke

And here's where it gets political. An opposition legislator joined the Mumbai protests in September, saying his party would move the project if they came to power. So this isn't just a local complaint anymore—it's becoming a wedge issue.

Mark

Do other countries have this problem?

Mimi

Yes. Virginia, Amsterdam, Dublin—residents everywhere are pushing back on data centre expansion. But the difference is those places have more water. India's constraint is real and immediate.

Luke

Even some data centre operators in India are saying this doesn't make sense. The CEO of Sify Infinit Spaces said publicly he would never build a data centre in a residential area because they need uninterrupted power and water, and near homes they risk being starved of both.

Mark

So Modi's ambition might run into a hard limit that's not political—it's physical.

Mimi

That's the tension. The strategy is sound in theory. But it depends on resources India doesn't have in abundance, and on communities accepting the trade-offs. Right now, those communities are saying no.

  • Hundreds of Mumbai residents gathered beside a 54-acre Amazon construction site in September, holding signs reading 'Data centres are energy vampires' — a protest that has since become a symbol of a nationwide unease.
  • India's water crisis gives the conflict a sharp edge: with only 4% of the world's freshwater for 18% of its population, data centre consumption is projected to surge from 150 billion to over 300 billion litres annually by 2030.
  • Amazon insists its facility draws from dedicated sources and uses water-free cooling, but residents report noise affecting children and the elderly, falling property values, and a consultation process they say never happened.
  • Political opposition is mobilizing — in Mumbai, legislator Aaditya Thackeray pledged to relocate the Amazon project if his party returns to power; in Andhra Pradesh, Google's $15 billion investment faces environmental and religious land-use challenges.
  • Internally, Amazon reportedly believes the protests will subside, while some industry leaders openly question whether data centres belong near homes at all — a fracture within the sector that could reshape where future facilities are sited.

In the shadow of India's ambition to become the world's AI infrastructure backbone, a quieter reckoning is unfolding at street level — where residents of Mumbai and Andhra Pradesh find their water, their sleep, and their sense of place disrupted by the physical weight of the digital age. Prime Minister Modi's vision of hosting the world's data, backed by over $56 billion in commitments from Amazon, Google, and Microsoft, now meets the oldest of human resistances: the defense of home. In a country where freshwater scarcity is already a lived emergency, the question of who bears the cost of progress has moved from policy papers into the streets.

Tushar Shetty bought his Mumbai apartment five months ago for the view — open green space, trees, the quiet that justifies a premium address. Today, a construction site has replaced it, as Amazon's data centre rises on 54 acres below his window. "I would not have bought the house if I had known," he said. His frustration is one thread in a widening resistance that is beginning to complicate India's most ambitious infrastructure bet.

Prime Minister Modi has wagered a significant part of his economic vision on a clear premise: if India cannot yet lead in building frontier AI, it can dominate the infrastructure that runs it. Amazon, Google, and Microsoft have responded with combined commitments exceeding $56 billion. The strategy is economically coherent — but it lands in neighbourhoods, on aquifers, and against the daily lives of people who were never asked.

The strain is sharpest around water. India holds only 4 percent of the world's freshwater while sustaining 18 percent of its population. Data centres already consumed roughly 150 billion litres in 2025; that figure is projected to more than double by 2030. Between 60 and 80 percent of India's data centres could face high water stress within this decade, according to S&P Global.

The Mumbai site has become the most visible flashpoint. More than a thousand residents say the project advanced without genuine consultation. Among those who want to leave is Vasudha Shetty, 62: "If the data centre stops, we will stay. If it goes ahead, we will move." Amazon has defended its approach — dedicated water and power sources, water-free cooling, noise mitigation, more saplings planted than trees removed — but the reassurances have not quieted the streets.

Even voices within the industry are uneasy. Sharad Agarwal, CEO of a company operating 14 data centres, said plainly at a September industry event that he would never site a facility in a residential area, warning that homes and data centres compete for the same scarce resources. In Andhra Pradesh, Google's $15 billion project faces opposition over wildlife, water, and allegations of improper use of temple land. Opposition politician Aaditya Thackeray joined Mumbai protesters in September, pledging relocation if his party returns to power.

Modi's government has promoted data centres as "the invisible engines powering India's digital life," but key ministries have not responded to press inquiries. Internally, Amazon is said to believe the protests will pass — while quietly developing community outreach plans. "For now there is no other option but to live with protests," one person familiar with the company's planning said.

The data centres are already here. What remains unresolved is whether they can share space — water, power, quiet, and trust — with the people whose neighbourhoods they are permanently changing.

Tushar Shetty, 46, bought his apartment on Mumbai's 21st floor five months ago for the view. What stretched beyond his window was open green space—trees, earth, the kind of quiet that justifies a premium address. Today, that view is gone. In its place is a construction site, red earth scarred where an Amazon data centre is rising as part of the company's planned $21 billion investment in AI infrastructure across India by 2030. "I would not have bought the house if I had known," Shetty said. He is one voice in a growing chorus of resistance that is reshaping how India's government and its tech partners think about the physical backbone of artificial intelligence.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi has staked a significant portion of his economic vision on a simple premise: if India cannot yet compete with the United States and China in building frontier AI models, it can dominate something equally valuable—the infrastructure that runs them. Data centres are the invisible machinery of the digital age, and Modi's government has positioned India as the place where the world's data will live. Amazon, Google, and Microsoft have responded with commitments totaling more than $56 billion in combined investments. The strategy is ambitious and, on paper, economically sound. But it collides directly with the lived reality of people who live near where these facilities are being built.

The tension is not unique to India. From Virginia's suburbs to the edges of Amsterdam and Dublin, residents have mounted increasingly vocal campaigns against data centre expansion, citing noise, electricity consumption, water depletion, and the sudden industrialization of neighbourhoods that were once residential. What makes India's situation acute is the underlying scarcity. The country holds only 4 percent of the world's freshwater while supporting 18 percent of its population. Data centres are clustering in cities already experiencing water stress. According to S&P Global, between 60 and 80 percent of India's data centres could face high water stress within this decade. In 2025 alone, data centres consumed approximately 150 billion litres of water. That figure is projected to more than double by 2030, according to research from Mordor Intelligence.

The Amazon project near Mumbai has become the most visible flashpoint. Reuters interviews with more than two dozen residents and a review of official correspondence reveal deepening anxiety about strain on local power and water supplies and noise that residents say poses particular risks to children and the elderly. On September 8, hundreds of residents gathered beside the 54-acre site holding signs that read "Data centres are energy vampires." Among them was Vasudha Shetty, 62, who purchased a flat near the facility but now wants to leave. "If the data centre stops, we will stay," she said. "If it goes ahead, we will move." More than 1,000 residents say the project was advanced without genuine community consultation.

Amazon has defended the facility, stating that water and power will come from dedicated sources separate from public utilities, and that water-free cooling technology and noise-mitigation measures are in place. The company noted that more saplings were planted than trees removed. Yet even some industry leaders question the logic of placing data centres in residential areas. Sharad Agarwal, CEO of Sify Infinit Spaces, which operates 14 data centres, said bluntly at an industry event in September: "I will never set up a data centre in a residential area. Centres need abundant, uninterrupted power and water, and near homes they risk being starved of both in a shortage."

The political dimension is sharpening. In Andhra Pradesh, environmentalists are opposing Google's $15 billion data centre project, citing threats to wildlife and water supplies and alleging that temple land was used without permission. Google and state officials deny wrongdoing. In Mumbai, opposition legislator Aaditya Thackeray joined protesters in September, pledging that his party would relocate the Amazon project if returned to power. Property broker Atul Jadhav reported that buyer concerns over views and property values may already be depressing resale prices in affected neighbourhoods.

Modi's government has mounted a public defence, promoting data centres online as "the invisible engines powering India's digital life" and arguing that modern technologies use water and electricity more efficiently than older infrastructure. The Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology, the Prime Minister's Office, and Maharashtra's chief minister's office did not respond to requests for comment. Internally, according to a person familiar with Amazon's planning, the company is not deeply concerned because government officials have indicated the protests will eventually subside. Still, Amazon is developing community outreach plans to address noise, water, and power concerns. "Building data centres comes at a cost," the person said. "For now there is no other option but to live with protests."

What unfolds in Mumbai and Andhra Pradesh will likely shape how India pursues Modi's ambition to host the world's data. The strategy depends on both government support and community tolerance. As water stress intensifies and residents organize, that tolerance is visibly thinning. The question is no longer whether data centres will come to India—they are already here. The question is whether they can coexist with the people whose neighbourhoods they are transforming.

I would not have bought the house if I had known
— Tushar Shetty, 46-year-old engineer whose Mumbai apartment overlooks the Amazon construction site
I will never set up a data centre in a residential area. Centres need abundant, uninterrupted power and water, and near homes they risk being starved of both in a shortage.
— Sharad Agarwal, CEO of Sify Infinit Spaces, speaking at an industry event in September
Contattaci Domande frequenti