Across England's great metropolitan corridors, a quiet but consequential redistribution of authority is underway. Thirteen elected mayors will soon hold the power to override local councils on major housing and commercial developments, a shift the government frames as a necessary response to a housing crisis that has left nearly 180,000 children in temporary accommodation. The move reflects an enduring tension in democratic governance — between the speed that large-scale problems demand and the local voice that legitimacy requires. Whether this new architecture of power builds homes or merely
Mayors gain power to overrule councils on major planning decisions
Nearly 180,000 children live in temporary accommodation
Mark
Why does the government think mayors are better positioned than councils to approve housing?
Mimi
The theory is that councils are too close to local opposition—they hear from residents who don't want change and become risk-averse. Mayors are elected at a larger scale and can think about regional housing needs rather than neighborhood objections. London's mayor already has this power.
Mark
But doesn't that just move the problem up a level? Won't people still object?
Mimi
Yes, but the government's bet is that mayors have more political cover to say no to objections because they're not answerable to the same local councillors. Whether that actually works depends on whether mayors face their own electoral consequences.
Mark
What about areas that don't have mayors? Are they just stuck?
Mimi
That's the core complaint from the opposition. If you live in a place without a Combined Authority, you keep the old system. If you live in Manchester or Liverpool, your local council loses power. It creates two different systems running in parallel.
Mark
Is the 1.5 million home target realistic?
Mimi
The government says it has to be. Nearly 180,000 children are in temporary housing. But housebuilders are already warning the target will be missed, and London's housebuilding has actually fallen in recent years despite the mayor's call-in powers.
Mark
So this might not solve the problem?
Mimi
It might not. But the government is betting that removing one layer of approval will help. They're also giving mayors control over funding and sending civil servants to mayoral offices to build capacity.
Mark
What's the real risk here?
Mimi
That you end up with powerful mayors who can push through development that communities genuinely don't want, without the local accountability that councils provide. Or that nothing changes and the housing crisis persists anyway.
Le Pouls
- Labour's pledge to build 1.5 million homes by decade's end is already under pressure, with housebuilders warning the target is slipping out of reach.
- Mayors in thirteen combined authorities will gain the power to override local council planning decisions on developments exceeding 150 homes, 15,000 square metres of commercial space, or 30 metres in height.
- Opposition parties are sounding alarms from multiple directions — Conservatives cite democratic erosion, Liberal Democrats warn of a two-tier England, Greens call it a distraction, and Reform UK sees centralisation dressed as devolution.
- The government is cushioning the shift by insisting councils retain authority over the vast majority of applications and that all decisions must still comply with existing planning law.
- A government consultation launches next week, but the deeper test will be whether mayors can unblock stalled housing sites without inheriting — and inflaming — the local resistance that has long buried development projects.
Across England's great metropolitan corridors, a quiet but consequential redistribution of authority is underway. Thirteen elected mayors will soon hold the power to override local councils on major housing and commercial developments, a shift the government frames as a necessary response to a housing crisis that has left nearly 180,000 children in temporary accommodation. The move reflects an enduring tension in democratic governance — between the speed that large-scale problems demand and the local voice that legitimacy requires. Whether this new architecture of power builds homes or merely relocates conflict remains the open question of the decade.
England's elected mayors are on the verge of acquiring a significant new instrument of power. Across thirteen metropolitan areas — from Manchester and Liverpool to the West Midlands, South Yorkshire, and beyond — mayors will be able to override local council planning decisions on major developments: anything involving more than 150 homes, more than 15,000 square metres of commercial space, or buildings taller than 30 metres.
Housing minister Matthew Pennycook positioned the change as essential to Labour's 1.5 million homes target, a promise made in the 2024 election that housebuilders are already warning may be in jeopardy. He pointed to the human cost of inaction — nearly 180,000 children currently living in temporary accommodation — and cited London mayor Sadiq Khan's existing call-in powers as a working model, even as housebuilding in the capital has recently declined.
Beyond the override authority, mayors will also gain 'up-front permission' powers allowing development to proceed without formal applications, and greater influence over how national housing funding is directed in their regions. Prime Minister Andy Burnham, himself a former mayor of Greater Manchester, has championed the shift as a necessary check on local decision-making, arguing the relationship between councils and mayors must run in both directions.
The opposition has responded with force. Conservatives accused the government of stripping councils of authority while easing approvals for traveller sites. The Liberal Democrats warned of a two-tier England that disadvantages areas without mayors. The Greens called it surface-level tinkering that ignores austerity-hollowed local authorities. Reform UK labelled it centralisation in disguise.
The government insists councils will still handle the overwhelming majority of planning decisions, and a formal consultation on implementation begins next week. The harder question — whether concentrating planning power in mayoral hands will finally unblock England's housing pipeline, or simply relocate its political battles — will take years to answer.
England's mayors are about to gain a significant new lever over housing and development. Starting with thirteen metropolitan areas—Manchester, Liverpool, the West Midlands, and others stretching from the North East to the East Midlands—elected mayors will soon be able to override local council planning decisions on major projects. The threshold is clear: any proposal involving more than 150 homes, more than 15,000 square metres of commercial space, or buildings exceeding 30 metres in height will fall within this new mayoral authority.
Housing minister Matthew Pennycook framed the shift as necessary infrastructure for the government's ambition. Labour promised during the 2024 election to build 1.5 million homes across England by the end of the decade, and housebuilders have already signalled that target is at risk. Pennycook acknowledged the goal was "really stretching" but pointed to the scale of the crisis: nearly 180,000 children currently live in temporary accommodation. He argued that the new powers would help mayors "unblock strategic growth sites" and that London's mayor, Sadiq Khan, had already demonstrated the value of similar authority, despite recent declines in housebuilding in the capital.
The mayors gaining these "call-in" powers will operate in Combined Authorities across the country: North East England, South Yorkshire, West Yorkshire, York and North Yorkshire, Hull and East Yorkshire, Greater Lincolnshire, Cambridgeshire and Peterborough, East Midlands, and Tees Valley. Beyond the ability to override councils, mayors will also receive "up-front permission" authority, allowing development to proceed without developers having to submit formal applications—a mechanism designed to accelerate the approval process further. The government has also committed to giving mayors greater influence over how housing funding flows into their regions, directing the national agency Homes England to align its priorities with local mayoral preferences.
Prime Minister Andy Burnham, who spent nearly a decade as mayor of Greater Manchester, has been a vocal advocate for this devolution of power. He told the Sunday Times that the relationship between local authorities and mayors needed to be bidirectional: sometimes councils propose projects harmful to communities, sometimes mayors do. He framed it as a necessary check on local decision-making. Burnham has also announced plans to give all mayors a share of income tax revenue and is sending high-performing civil servants to work in mayoral offices, part of a broader push to consolidate power at the mayoral level.
The opposition has been swift and pointed. Conservative shadow housing secretary Sir James Cleverly accused the government of stripping councils of planning authority while simultaneously making it easier to approve traveller sites against local opposition. The Liberal Democrats, led by housing spokesperson Gideon Amos, warned that the change creates a "two-tier system" that disadvantages areas without elected mayors and removes decision-making power from local residents and councillors. The Greens' deputy leader Mothin Ali dismissed the move as "tinkering" that ignores the real problem: local authorities starved of resources by government austerity budgets. Reform UK called it "centralisation in disguise," arguing that Westminster is extending control rather than genuinely devolving power.
The government has sought to soften the blow by insisting that councils will still decide the vast majority of planning applications and that all decisions must comply with existing planning rules. A consultation on how the new powers will function is scheduled to launch next week. What remains to be seen is whether mayors can use this authority to accelerate housing delivery without triggering the kind of local backlash that has historically derailed development projects—or whether the concentration of power will simply shift conflict from council chambers to mayoral offices.
Citations marquantes
Nearly 180,000 children are in temporary accommodation, and any smaller target wouldn't match the scale of the challenge.— Housing minister Matthew Pennycook
Taking powers away from communities and local councillors is taking powers away from local people.— Gideon Amos, Liberal Democrat housing and planning spokesperson
Envie de l'histoire complète ?
Lire l'original sur BBC News ↗
Politics & Governance