Lululemon expects fiscal 2026 revenue to drop 5-7% to $10.35-10.5B USD, a sharp reversal from June guidance predicting flat-to-1% decline. Leggings sales plummeted 20% in Q2 as consumers shift to wider-leg styles; North America comparable sales fell 12%, far below analyst expectations.
Lululemon slashes revenue forecast again as activewear competition intensifies
Leggings sales fell 20%, customers want wider legs
So Lululemon cut its forecast twice in three months. What actually changed between June and now?
The company saw the trends accelerate in the third quarter. Product launches weren't landing the way they hoped, and the pressure in North America and China got worse, not better.
But we should be careful here—Frank is describing what she observed, not necessarily what caused it. We know comparable sales fell 12 percent in North America, but we don't know if that's because of one specific thing or a dozen small things compounding.
What about the leggings? That seems like a concrete problem.
Yes—leggings sales dropped 20 percent in Q2. That's a real shift. Customers are moving to wider-leg styles. Lululemon is betting on new products like Groove pants to capture that demand.
That's fair, but it's worth noting that's a Q2 number. We don't have Q3 data yet on whether those new styles are actually working. The forecast cut suggests they're not confident they will.
And the competition—Alo, Vuori, Gymshark—is that new?
The competition itself isn't new, but it's clearly intensifying. Lululemon's loss of relevance is real. Customers are trying other brands.
The source doesn't quantify how much market share Lululemon has lost to those competitors, though. We know Lululemon is struggling, but we don't know the exact size of the shift.
What does the new CEO inherit?
A company that needs to prove it can adapt. Cost-cutting is underway, but the real test is whether Heidi O'Neill can make the product line feel fresh again.
And we won't know that for months. The forecast cut is real and concrete. Everything else—whether the turnaround works—is still ahead of us.
Il Polso
- Fiscal 2026 revenue expected to decline 5-7% to $10.35-10.5B USD, revised from June guidance of flat-to-1% decline
- Leggings sales down 20% in Q2; North America comparable sales fell 12%, well below analyst expectations
- Q2 net revenue $2.4B (down 4% YoY); net income fell to $329.2M from $370.9M year-over-year
- New CEO Heidi O'Neill from Nike arrives next week amid competition from Alo, Vuori, Gymshark
Lululemon expects fiscal 2026 revenue to drop 5-7% to $10.35-10.5B USD, a sharp reversal from June guidance predicting flat-to-1% decline. Leggings sales plummeted 20% in Q2 as consumers shift to wider-leg styles; North America comparable sales fell 12%, far below analyst expectations.
Lululemon cuts its annual revenue forecast for the second time in three months, now expecting a 5-7% decline as the activewear maker struggles with inconsistent product launches and intensifying competition.
Lululemon Athletica is bracing for a sharper downturn than it predicted just three months ago. On Thursday, the Vancouver apparel maker announced it now expects fiscal 2026 revenue—the year ending January 31, 2027—to fall between 5 and 7 percent compared to the prior year, landing somewhere in the range of $10.35 billion to $10.5 billion in U.S. dollars. The revision marks a dramatic shift from the company's June guidance, when executives had signaled revenue would be essentially flat or decline by only about 1 percent. In the span of a single quarter, the outlook darkened considerably.
The deterioration reflects what Meghan Frank, the company's chief financial officer and interim co-chief executive, described as "challenging dynamics" that continue to weigh on both sales and profitability. Speaking on a conference call Thursday to discuss second-quarter results, Frank acknowledged that while the company has seen positive customer response to certain activations and newer styles, the overall reception to product launches remains uneven. More troubling, she noted, is sustained pressure on the brand in its two largest markets: North America and mainland China. The company had initially banked on international growth to offset modest declines in North America, but that calculus has shifted.
The second quarter itself delivered disappointing numbers. Net revenue came in at $2.4 billion, down 4 percent year-over-year, or 5 percent when adjusted for currency fluctuations. More strikingly, comparable sales—the metric that strips out the noise of store openings and closures to show true underlying demand—fell 9 percent, or 10 percent on a constant-currency basis. In North America alone, comparable sales dropped 12 percent, a result that fell far short of analyst expectations of roughly 5.8 percent growth. Net income declined to $329.2 million, or $2.92 per share, from $370.9 million, or $3.10 per share, in the same quarter the previous year.
At the heart of the struggle is a fundamental shift in consumer preference. Leggings, the category that built Lululemon's reputation and drove its early growth, have become a liability. Sales in that category alone fell roughly 20 percent in the second quarter. The culprit is not a loss of interest in activewear itself, but rather a move away from the skintight silhouettes that once defined the brand. Shoppers are gravitating toward wider-leg styles instead. Frank pointed to products like the Groove wide-leg pants, Align joggers, and Dance Studio pants as offerings expected to gain traction in the second half of the year, suggesting the company believes it can recalibrate its product mix to match evolving tastes.
But the challenge extends beyond fit and silhouette. Lululemon faces an increasingly crowded competitive landscape. Brands like Alo, Vuori, and Gymshark have captured market share from customers seeking fresh alternatives to Lululemon's offerings. The company's efforts to reverse course—including increased marketing spending, store renovations, and faster product cycles—have not yet moved the needle. Frank acknowledged that the company is now taking an "even more aggressive stance" on cost reduction, a tacit admission that revenue growth alone will not solve the problem.
The timing of these challenges coincides with a leadership transition. Heidi O'Neill, a veteran from Nike, is set to assume the role of chief executive next week. She inherits a company that must simultaneously defend its core market position, adapt to shifting consumer preferences, and prove it can compete against a wave of newer, nimbler rivals. The two consecutive forecast cuts in as many quarters underscore the urgency of that task.
Citazioni salienti
The overall response to our product launches remains inconsistent, and we've continued to see pressure on the brand in both of our largest markets.— Meghan Frank, CFO and interim co-CEO, Lululemon