NASA's Spacesuit Delays Threaten 2028 Moon Landing Timeline

The original timelines were never realistic, and they know it now.
NASA's Inspector General found that the 2025-2026 demonstration schedule for next-generation spacesuits was fundamentally unachievable from the start.

NASA's Inspector General found original 2025-2026 spacesuit demonstration timelines were unrealistic, with delays of at least 18 months already documented. Axiom Space, the sole remaining contractor after Collins Aerospace contract cancellation, is developing revolutionary AxEMU suits designed by Prada for extreme lunar conditions.

  • NASA canceled Collins Aerospace's spacesuit contract in 2024 after the company failed to meet deadlines
  • Axiom Space's AxEMU suits, designed by Prada, weigh 130 kilograms and are built for lunar south pole conditions of minus-50 degrees Celsius
  • The Inspector General's report found delays of at least 18 months already, with potential further slippage to 2031 if typical aerospace delays occur
  • The 228 million dollar contract is now entirely dependent on a single contractor founded in 2016
  • Two lunar landings are scheduled for early and late 2028, but the spacesuits needed for surface operations may not be ready

NASA warns that Axiom Space may miss deadlines for next-generation spacesuits critical to 2028 lunar missions, with inspector general report suggesting delays could push demonstrations to 2031.

NASA's ambitious plan to return humans to the Moon in 2028 is colliding with a hard reality: the spacesuits designed to get them there may not be ready. An internal report from the agency's Inspector General, released this month, lays out the problem with clinical precision. The original timeline for demonstrating next-generation lunar suits and microgravity suits—2025 and 2026 respectively—was never realistic. Both programs are already running at least eighteen months behind schedule, and if Axiom Space, the sole contractor now responsible for the work, experiences delays typical of recent aerospace projects, the demonstrations could slip all the way to 2031.

The stakes are high. The White House has made returning to the Moon before the end of the current presidential term in early 2029 a priority, with two landings planned for early and late 2028. The geopolitical backdrop is unmistakable: the United States is racing against China to maintain dominance in space exploration. But that race depends on equipment that may not arrive on time.

The path to this bottleneck began in 2022, when NASA contracted with two companies—Collins Aerospace and Axiom Space—to develop the next generation of spacesuits for the Artemis lunar missions and operations aboard the International Space Station. Two years later, NASA terminated Collins Aerospace's contract, citing the company's inability to meet the demonstration schedule. The decision was pragmatic but risky. Collins Aerospace, despite being founded in 2018, carried the legacy of companies that had built the suits Neil Armstrong wore on the Moon and the radio through which he spoke to Earth. Canceling its contract meant betting everything on a single company with a much shorter track record. Axiom Space, founded in 2016 to build a private space station, had conducted several private spaceflights to the ISS and counted Spanish astronaut Miguel López Alegría among its staff. The contract was worth 228 million dollars.

That risk has materialized. The Inspector General's thirty-eight-page report is unsparing. NASA faces serious challenges in ensuring that next-generation spacesuits will be available in time for the 2028 Artemis landing and before the ISS is decommissioned in 2030. The original timelines were too optimistic and ultimately unachievable. The analysis suggests that if Axiom encounters design and testing delays consistent with the historical average of recent spaceflight programs, the demonstrations for both Artemis and the ISS could not occur before 2031.

The technical challenge is substantial. The suits worn by the four astronauts on the recent lunar orbit mission—Wiseman, Hansen, Koch, and Glover—serve only for launch, reentry, and emergencies. They are useless for spacewalks and entirely inadequate for walking on the Moon. The suits currently used on the ISS are essentially updated versions of designs from the 1970s. Axiom's new Extravehicular Mobility Unit, or AxEMU, is meant to change that. Designed by the Italian fashion house Prada, the suits represent what the company calls a revolutionary advance in engineering. They are built to withstand the extreme conditions of the lunar south pole, where temperatures plunge to fifty degrees below zero in the sparse sunlight, and to resist the abrasive lunar dust. Each suit, including its life-support backpack, weighs 130 kilograms—significantly heavier than the eighty-four kilograms of the Apollo-era suits, though more flexible and adaptable, with 4G connectivity. Early testing has revealed problems: the suits have caused bruising and abrasions.

Axiom Space has pushed back against the pessimism. The company insists it remains on track for a first flight test in 2027 and says it is working with the urgency the Artemis campaign demands. It has logged more than nine hundred fifty hours of pressurized testing with crew, completed the first thermal vacuum test of the pressure garment, and delivered more than thirteen hundred components for critical design review. The company says it is confident in its path toward a 2027 demonstration and toward supporting the American return to the lunar surface in 2028. But the Inspector General's report suggests that confidence may be misplaced. If the pattern holds, the Moon landing that was supposed to happen in 2028 could be waiting until 2031—a delay that would reshape not just NASA's timeline but the entire calculus of the space race.

Axiom Space is working on the most advanced spacesuit ever built for human lunar exploration, and we are doing it with the urgency the Artemis campaign demands. We remain confident in our path toward a 2027 demonstration and supporting the return of the United States to the lunar surface in 2028.
— Axiom Space statement
If Axiom experiences delays in design and testing similar to the historical average of recent spaceflight programs, demonstrations for Artemis and the ISS could not occur before 2031.
— NASA Inspector General report
The Hearth Conversation Another angle on the story
Inventor

Why did NASA put all its eggs in one basket by canceling Collins Aerospace's contract?

Model

It wasn't a choice made lightly. Collins was falling behind, and NASA had to decide: keep funding a contractor that couldn't meet deadlines, or consolidate around the one that seemed more promising. Axiom had momentum, private sector backing, and a clearer vision. But it meant there was no backup plan.

Inventor

And Axiom has never built spacesuits at this scale before?

Model

Not for lunar missions, no. They've done private spaceflights, station work. But a suit that has to function in minus-fifty-degree temperatures while protecting an astronaut from abrasive dust? That's a different order of complexity. The Apollo suits weighed eighty-four kilograms. Axiom's weigh one hundred thirty. More capability, but also more to go wrong.

Inventor

The Inspector General's report suggests delays could push everything to 2031. What does that actually mean for the mission?

Model

It means the political timeline collapses. The White House wants boots on the Moon before the current term ends in early 2029. If the suits aren't ready until 2031, that's not happening. And it gives China more time to move forward with its own lunar program.

Inventor

Is there any way Axiom actually delivers on time?

Model

They say they will. They've completed significant testing, they're confident in their design. But the Inspector General looked at the historical pattern of aerospace programs and found that delays like this—eighteen months already—tend to compound. If Axiom hits the average, 2027 becomes 2031.

Inventor

What happens to the ISS if the suits aren't ready?

Model

The station is scheduled to be decommissioned in 2030. If the new suits aren't certified by then, you're operating with equipment designed in the seventies. That's not sustainable for a facility that's supposed to be cutting-edge.

Inventor

So this is really about whether one company can deliver on a promise that's become politically essential?

Model

Exactly. Axiom is carrying the weight of American space ambitions right now. If they slip, everything slips.

Contact Us FAQ