In a Los Angeles federal courtroom, Grammy-winning rapper Lil Durk was acquitted of murder-for-hire charges that could have cost him his freedom for life — a verdict that closes one legal chapter while another, darker one remains open. The case drew its origins from the 2020 killing of Chicago rapper King Von, whose death set in motion a chain of retaliation that ultimately claimed the life of an uninvolved 24-year-old, Saviay'a Robinson. The jury's decision reflects the enduring difficulty of prosecuting conspiracy in the shadow of grief, loyalty, and the violent economies of fame — yet Durk
Lil Durk acquitted in murder-for-hire plot; faces separate racketeering trial
Saviay'a Robinson, 24, was killed in a 2022 shooting near Beverly Center in Los Angeles when gunfire intended for Quando Rondo missed its target.
The jury rejected all of it.
Mark
So Durk walked on the murder-for-hire charges entirely—that's a complete acquittal, not a hung jury or mistrial?
Mimi
Yes, the jury found him not guilty on all counts. He faced murder, stalking, conspiracy—charges that could have meant life in prison. The jury rejected all of it.
Luke
But we should be clear: two of his co-defendants were convicted of stalking charges. So the jury wasn't saying nothing happened. They just didn't find Durk guilty of his specific charges.
Mark
What was the prosecution's actual evidence that Durk ordered the hit?
Mimi
They relied on testimony from two men who pleaded guilty—Keith Jones and Kavon Grant. Both testified that Durk had offered to pay a bounty to kill Quando Rondo. But the jury didn't find that convincing enough to convict.
Luke
And that's the thing: we don't know exactly why the jury acquitted him. Was the evidence weak? Was the testimony not credible? Did they think the bounty claim wasn't proven? The verdict doesn't tell us.
Mark
The shooting that killed Saviay'a Robinson—that actually happened, right? That's not in dispute?
Mimi
Right. In 2022, someone shot at Quando Rondo near Beverly Center in LA. They missed Rondo but hit and killed his cousin, Robinson, who was 24. Keith Jones pleaded guilty to that murder.
Luke
So the underlying crime—the actual killing—is established. What's unclear is whether Durk ordered it or paid for it.
Mark
And now he's facing a racketeering trial in October?
Mimi
Yes. Different charges, different trial. Racketeering, murder, firearms offenses. He's still in custody.
Luke
So this acquittal doesn't end his legal exposure. It's one trial down, one to go.
Mark
Does the acquittal help him in the racketeering case, or are they completely separate?
Mimi
They're separate prosecutions with separate evidence. The acquittal doesn't directly affect the racketeering trial, though it might influence how prosecutors approach it or how a jury perceives the government's case.
Luke
We should note: the government said they're disappointed but ready to proceed. They're not backing down.
The Pulse
- A murder-for-hire plot allegedly born from grief over a fallen friend ended with a young woman dead and a rapper facing life in prison.
- Two cooperating witnesses who admitted to their own roles in the conspiracy testified against Durk, making the prosecution's case rest heavily on the credibility of men who had already pleaded guilty.
- The jury acquitted Durk on all counts but convicted two co-defendants on stalking-related charges, drawing a fractured line of accountability across the same alleged scheme.
- Federal prosecutors, visibly unsatisfied, signaled they are not finished — a separate racketeering trial involving murder and firearms charges is set to begin October 5.
- Despite the not-guilty verdict, Durk walks away from one courtroom only to remain behind bars, his legal reckoning unresolved and his future still uncertain.
In a Los Angeles federal courtroom, Grammy-winning rapper Lil Durk was acquitted of murder-for-hire charges that could have cost him his freedom for life — a verdict that closes one legal chapter while another, darker one remains open. The case drew its origins from the 2020 killing of Chicago rapper King Von, whose death set in motion a chain of retaliation that ultimately claimed the life of an uninvolved 24-year-old, Saviay'a Robinson. The jury's decision reflects the enduring difficulty of prosecuting conspiracy in the shadow of grief, loyalty, and the violent economies of fame — yet Durk remains in custody, with a racketeering trial still ahead.
A federal jury in Los Angeles acquitted rapper Lil Durk — born Durk Devontay Banks — of all charges in a murder-for-hire conspiracy on Friday, sparing him from a potential life sentence. The charges had grown from an alleged plot to kill rapper Quando Rondo in retaliation for the 2020 shooting death of King Von, a Chicago artist closely affiliated with Durk's collective, OTF. That scheme, prosecutors argued, led to a 2022 shooting near the Beverly Center in Los Angeles that missed its intended target entirely and instead killed Saviay'a Robinson, 24, Rondo's cousin.
Two co-defendants — OTF Dede and Browneyez — were convicted of stalking and stalking conspiracy but cleared of the murder-for-hire charges. The government's case leaned heavily on testimony from two men who had already pleaded guilty: Keith Jones, who admitted to Robinson's killing, and Kavon Grant, both of whom testified against Durk and his co-defendants.
The acquittal arrives at an unlikely intersection of legal peril and professional recognition — Durk won a Grammy in 2024 for Best Melodic Rap Performance and has received three additional nominations. Yet the verdict offers only partial relief. Durk remains in federal custody and faces a separate racketeering trial beginning October 5, where prosecutors plan to pursue charges involving racketeering, murder, and firearms. First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli expressed disappointment with Friday's outcome but made clear the government intends to press forward. The legal story, for now, is far from finished.
A federal jury in Los Angeles cleared Grammy-winning rapper Lil Durk of all charges in a murder-for-hire conspiracy on Friday, delivering an acquittal that came as the Chicago artist faced potential life imprisonment if convicted. Durk, whose legal name is Durk Devontay Banks, had been charged with multiple felonies including murder, stalking, and conspiracy as part of an alleged plot connected to Chicago's rap underworld and a deadly cycle of retaliation between rival figures.
The case centered on an alleged scheme to kill Quando Rondo, a rapper whose real name is Tyquian Bowman. Authorities contended that Durk had offered to pay a bounty to anyone willing to carry out the killing. In 2022, a shooting targeting Rondo near the Beverly Center in Los Angeles missed him entirely but struck his cousin, Saviay'a Robinson, who was 24 years old. Robinson died from the gunfire. Investigators traced the plot's origins to an earlier killing: the 2020 death of King Von, a Chicago rapper affiliated with Durk's collective, Only the Family, known as OTF. Von was shot during an early morning confrontation outside the Monaco Hookah Lounge in Atlanta. The alleged murder-for-hire scheme, authorities said, was retaliation for Von's death.
Two co-defendants tried alongside Durk—Deandre Wilson, known as OTF Dede, and David Lindsey, known as Browneyez—were convicted of stalking and stalking conspiracy but acquitted of murder-for-hire charges. Five other people associated with OTF faced accusations in the broader case. The prosecution's case relied significantly on testimony from two men who pleaded guilty: Keith Jones, known as Flacka, who admitted to Robinson's murder, and Kavon Grant, known as OTF Vonnie. Both testified against Durk, Wilson, and Lindsey during the trial.
Durk's acquittal comes at a moment of professional recognition. In 2024, he won a Grammy Award for Best Melodic Rap Performance for his single "All My Life," featuring J. Cole, and has received three additional Grammy nominations. Yet the legal proceedings are far from over. Despite the jury's not-guilty verdict on the murder-for-hire charges, Durk remains in federal custody. He faces a separate racketeering trial scheduled to begin on October 5, where prosecutors plan to present charges related to racketeering, murder, and firearms offenses.
First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli issued a statement expressing disappointment with the jury's decision regarding the murder-for-hire acquittal while signaling the government's readiness to proceed with the second trial. The racketeering case represents a distinct legal front, one that could carry its own serious consequences. For now, Durk's acquittal on the initial charges stands, but the broader legal reckoning continues.
Notable Quotes
While we are disappointed with the jury's decision regarding Durk Banks, we look forward to presenting our evidence at his second trial, scheduled for October 5, when he will face racketeering murder and firearms charges.— First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli
Want the full story?
Read the original at CBS News ↗
Crime & Justice