Australia's Labor government is drawing a firmer boundary around who may stay, and for how long, as it moves to close the gap between the letter of its migration law and the spirit it was meant to serve. Beginning in mid-2027, international students who wish to change courses will be required to apply for an entirely new visa — a structural shift designed to end the practice of using successive enrollments as a ladder to indefinite residency. The announcement arrives at a moment when more than 400,000 people sit on bridging visas, and when the government, unable to legislate its ambitions, mus
Labor targets 'visa hopping' students and dodgy migration agents in migration overhaul
Taking cash in those circumstances is not helping people—it's exploiting them
Mark
So the government is saying students can't just switch courses whenever they want anymore. What's actually changing on the ground?
Mimi
Starting now, if you want to transfer to a different course, you have to wait at least 12 months from when you started your current one. Then from July next year, you'll need to apply for a completely new student visa to make that move. It's meant to stop people using course transfers as a way to keep extending their time in Australia.
Luke
But how many students are actually doing this? The article doesn't give us a number for how prevalent "visa hopping" is. We know there are 400,000 people on bridging visas total, but we don't know how many of those are students switching courses versus other situations.
Mimi
That's fair. The government is clearly concerned about it, but you're right — they haven't quantified the problem. What we do know is they want to cut net migration from 300,000 to 225,000 annually by 2028, and this is part of that broader push.
Mark
And then there's the stuff about migration agents and lawyers. That sounds like a separate problem.
Mimi
It is, sort of. The government says agents and lawyers are helping people file visa applications they know won't succeed, just to extract fees. Hill gave examples of lawyers deliberately submitting applications designed to fail, then appealing them, then asking for ministerial intervention — basically keeping people in the system and paying for legal advice the whole time.
Luke
Those are dramatic examples, but again — how widespread is this? One lawyer submitting bad applications isn't necessarily evidence of a systemic problem. And the government is proposing to ban agents from helping with applications that "reasonably ought to know" lack a basis. That's a pretty subjective standard. What counts as reasonable?
Mimi
True. And migration lawyers operate under different rules than agents, so the government still has to figure out how to regulate them. They're consulting on that.
Mark
So what's the actual enforcement mechanism here?
Luke
That's the thing — we don't really know yet. The rules for agents are being proposed, but the details on how they'll be enforced, what the penalties are, how the Department of Home Affairs will actually police this — that's all still to come.
Mimi
The government is clearly frustrated with the current system. Hill's language about "bad actors" and "exploiting" vulnerable people suggests they see this as urgent. But you're right that the article doesn't tell us much about how they'll actually make it stick.
The Pulse
- Over 400,000 people are currently on bridging visas, many of them international students cycling through course changes to remain in the country — a backlog the government describes as both a practical crisis and a symbol of systemic failure.
- Migration agents and lawyers are accused of selling 'false hope' to vulnerable applicants, coaching some to fabricate protection claims or deliberately engineering rejections to trigger appeals that keep clients in legal limbo for years.
- Because Labor lacks parliamentary support from either the Coalition or the Greens, it cannot legislate these reforms and must instead act through administrative rules — a constraint that limits both the scope and the durability of what it can achieve.
- An interim rule blocking course transfers within the first 12 months of enrollment takes effect immediately, while the full requirement to apply for a new visa upon any course change is set for July 1, 2027.
- The government's stated target is to reduce net overseas migration from roughly 300,000 to 225,000 annually by 2028, framing tighter student visa rules as one lever in a broader effort to restore public confidence in the migration system.
Australia's Labor government is drawing a firmer boundary around who may stay, and for how long, as it moves to close the gap between the letter of its migration law and the spirit it was meant to serve. Beginning in mid-2027, international students who wish to change courses will be required to apply for an entirely new visa — a structural shift designed to end the practice of using successive enrollments as a ladder to indefinite residency. The announcement arrives at a moment when more than 400,000 people sit on bridging visas, and when the government, unable to legislate its ambitions, must instead reshape the system through administrative will. At its heart, the policy asks a perennial question of any open society: how to remain genuinely welcoming while insisting that welcome has a shape.
Australia's Labor government announced Friday a package of measures aimed at ending what officials call 'visa hopping' — the practice of international students repeatedly switching courses to extend their stay beyond the terms of their original visa. The centrepiece requires students to apply for a new visa whenever they transfer to a different course, a rule that takes effect from July 1, 2027. In the interim, transfers within the first 12 months of enrolment are blocked outright. These new restrictions build on earlier rules already barring students from downgrading their qualifications mid-study.
Assistant Minister for International Education Julian Hill framed the changes as a matter of basic fairness. Speaking to the Migration Institute of Australia, he argued that Australians travelling abroad do not expect to move freely between visa categories for years on end, and that guests in Australia should be held to the same standard. Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke reinforced the message, calling the reforms essential to restoring public trust in the migration system.
The student visa rules are one part of a wider effort to bring net overseas migration down from nearly 300,000 to 225,000 annually by 2028 — a target driven by significant political pressure at home. The government has been forced to pursue these goals through administrative action rather than legislation, lacking the parliamentary numbers to pass formal law.
The scale of the problem is visible in the bridging visa figures: more than 400,000 people currently hold these temporary documents, issued when an existing visa expires while a new application is pending. A substantial share of that population consists of students in transition between visa types.
The government is also moving against migration agents and lawyers it accuses of exploiting vulnerable applicants. Hill described a pattern in which practitioners pursue claims they know to be baseless — sometimes deliberately engineering refusals in order to trigger appeals and ministerial interventions, keeping clients in legal limbo while collecting fees. He cited examples of online advertising that appeared to coach applicants on fabricating protection claims. Proposed rules would ban migration agents from assisting with applications they know, or reasonably should know, lack any sound legal or factual basis, with similar standards under consultation for migration lawyers.
'Taking cash in those circumstances is not helping people,' Hill said. 'It's exploiting them and selling false hope.' Whether the measures will meaningfully reduce visa hopping, shrink the bridging visa backlog, and rebuild confidence in the system remains an open question — but the government has signalled it intends to keep tightening the architecture of the rules it can control.
Australia's Labor government is tightening the rules around international student visas, announcing Friday a package of measures designed to prevent what officials call "visa hopping" — the practice of students repeatedly switching courses to extend their stay in the country. The centerpiece of the overhaul requires students to apply for an entirely new visa when transferring to a different course, a requirement that takes effect from July 1, 2027. Until then, an interim rule blocks course transfers within the first 12 months of enrollment. These restrictions sit atop earlier rules already in place that bar students from downgrading their qualifications — moving, for instance, from a bachelor's degree to a vocational certificate.
The government is explicit about its intent. Julian Hill, the assistant minister for international education, framed the changes as a matter of fairness and system integrity. "When Australians go to another country they do not believe they have some God-given right to hop around from visa to visa for years or decades and game other nations' appeals and courts systems," he said in a speech to the Migration Institute of Australia. "Neither should guests in our country." Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke echoed the message on social media, calling the new rules essential to restoring public confidence in Australia's migration system.
The student visa measures are part of a larger effort to reduce net overseas migration. The government wants to bring annual arrivals down from nearly 300,000 to 225,000 by 2028. That target reflects political pressure at home, where migration has become a contentious issue. The government has been forced to implement these changes through administrative action rather than legislation because it lacks the support of either the Coalition or the Greens in Parliament — a constraint that has shaped what is actually possible.
One immediate consequence of the current system is visible in the numbers. More than 400,000 people are now on bridging visas, temporary documents issued when someone's existing visa has expired and they are waiting for a decision on their next application. A significant portion of that population consists of international students in the process of applying for different visas. The government sees reducing this backlog as both a practical and symbolic priority.
Beyond student visas, the government is also moving against migration agents and lawyers it accuses of exploiting vulnerable applicants. Hill described a pattern of misconduct: agents and lawyers helping people pursue visa claims they know have no reasonable factual or legal basis, extracting fees in the process. "Taking cash in those circumstances is not helping people," Hill said. "It's exploiting them and selling false hope." The government is proposing rules that would ban migration agents from assisting with applications they know, or reasonably ought to know, lack a sound legal or factual foundation. The Department of Home Affairs will consult on how to apply similar standards to migration lawyers, who currently operate under a different regulatory framework.
Hill offered specific examples of the conduct he wants to curtail. One lawyer, he said, had submitted an application with the explicit intention that it would be refused, then appealed to the administrative appeals tribunal where it would be refused again, and finally submitted for ministerial intervention — a strategy that consumes government resources and keeps the applicant in legal limbo. He also cited online advertising by lawyers that appeared to coach applicants on how to falsely claim they were bisexual or being persecuted in order to strengthen protection visa claims. "The current system for lawyers authorises and arguably requires them to act for clients in ways that damage the administration of and public confidence in Australia's migration system," Hill said.
The government frames these changes as necessary to restore integrity to a system it says has been gamed by both applicants and the agents advising them. Whether the measures will achieve their stated goals — reducing visa hopping, cutting net migration, and restoring public confidence — remains to be seen. The interim restrictions take effect immediately, while the full visa transfer requirement waits until mid-2027, giving the government time to implement the administrative machinery required to process separate applications for course changes.
Notable Quotes
When Australians go to another country they do not believe they have some God-given right to hop around from visa to visa for years or decades and game other nations' appeals and courts systems—and neither should guests in our country.— Julian Hill, assistant minister for international education
Increasingly sophisticated forms of migration-related misconduct and a small number of bad actors cause disproportionate harm, often targeting people at vulnerable points in their lives when they are highly susceptible to misleading claims, false promises and unrealistic assurances.— Julian Hill
Want the full story?
Read the original at The Guardian ↗