Journalist's investigation keeps serial offender in prison after four men report assaults

Four men came forward as victims of sexual assault by Grimson in the 1990s; two young men were murdered by him in 1997-1998, with another sailor missing since 1986.
How would I feel if he reoffended and harmed another young man
Astengo explains why she pursued the investigation despite the personal risk of exposing a dangerous man.
Mark

What made you decide to pursue this? You were already working on another story entirely.

Mimi

I was researching Simon Parkes, the sailor who went missing in Gibraltar in 1986. Grimson was there at the time. But while I was digging into that, I found something else—admissions he'd made to police about other assaults, offences that were never charged. That's what stopped me.

Mark

And you knew he was about to be released.

Mimi

Yes. The Parole Board had already recommended he move to an open prison. I kept thinking: what happens when he walks out? Does he think he got away with it? Does he reoffend? I couldn't sit with that.

Mark

But you were afraid.

Mimi

Absolutely. I was putting myself in the crosshairs of a killer. That wasn't abstract. But the alternative—doing nothing—felt worse. How would I live with myself if he harmed someone else?

Mark

So you found one of the men he'd assaulted.

Mimi

I tracked him down and travelled to meet him. He was angry, still hurt. He'd never seen justice. But he was also older now, a parent himself. He understood things he didn't back then—that he'd been groomed. When I told him he could file a complaint, I warned him it would open everything up again. He did it anyway.

Mark

And the others followed.

Mimi

Once one man came forward, the detectives found the rest. Four men in total. They were brave. They brought it all back into their lives, stood in court, and were heard. That's what this was really about.

  • A parole recommendation in 2020 set a clock ticking: a man convicted of murdering two young Navy sailors was moving toward release, while four other victims had never seen a courtroom.
  • Grimson's original prosecutors had quietly shelved the sexual assault allegations, reasoning that a life sentence made further charges unnecessary — a logic that left real harm unacknowledged and real people unheard.
  • Astengo tracked down one survivor still carrying decades of unprocessed trauma, told him he had the right to be heard, and when police were slow to act, escalated to a national child sexual abuse review panel.
  • The month-long trial exposed how profoundly the justice system has shifted — sexual offences are now pursued regardless of existing sentences — and how the ban on openly gay service members had once kept Grimson's victims silent out of fear of discharge.
  • The defence accused Astengo of manufacturing a case for book profits; the prosecutor called it a conspiracy theory and reminded the jury that good journalism and justice are not enemies.
  • The jury returned 13 guilty verdicts; the judge called Grimson extremely dangerous and ordered risk assessments before November sentencing, meaning the man who thought he had outrun accountability may remain imprisoned for years more.

When a parole board's recommendation signaled that a convicted killer might soon walk free, a journalist in Gibraltar chose to follow the thread of an incomplete justice rather than let it unravel quietly. Ros Astengo's investigation into Allan Grimson — a man whose original prosecution had left a trail of uncharged sexual offences — brought four survivors forward after decades of silence, resulting in 13 new convictions. The case stands as a reminder that justice is not always delivered in a single moment, and that the public interest sometimes requires one person to carry a weight the system has set down.

In 2020, when the Parole Board recommended moving Allan Grimson toward open prison conditions, journalist Ros Astengo was already deep in research on a separate case — a sailor who had vanished in Gibraltar in 1986 when Grimson was stationed there. What she found in the original case files disturbed her: during his police interviews, Grimson had admitted to sexual contact with four other young men and boys. The Crown Prosecution Service had never charged him for those offences, reasoning that his life sentence for the murders of two young Navy men in Portsmouth made further prosecution unnecessary.

Astengo knew that staying silent while a serial offender approached release was a choice she couldn't make. She tracked down one of the four men, found him still carrying the weight of what had happened — only now, as an adult and a parent, beginning to understand he had been groomed. She told him he could file a complaint. When police were slow to respond, she contacted the child sexual abuse review panel, which agreed the case warranted re-examination. Detectives found the other three men. Grimson was charged in February 2025.

The trial lasted a month and became a study in how much the justice system has changed. In the 1990s, serious sexual allegations were routinely dropped when defendants already faced lengthy sentences. The case also surfaced a darker history: until the turn of the century, gay people could not serve openly in the armed forces, and some of Grimson's victims had stayed silent fearing discharge if their assaults became known.

Grimson's defence argued the prosecution was a tactic to block parole, and attacked Astengo as motivated by book profits. The prosecutor urged the jury to see through what he called conspiracy theories, noting that good journalism serves justice. The jury found Grimson guilty on all 13 counts. The judge described him as extremely dangerous and ordered risk assessments before sentencing in November.

Astengo paid for every trip to the UK herself, taking unpaid leave. She said she would make little from her book. The four men who came forward had reopened wounds that had never fully healed and stood in court to be heard. Because they did — and because one journalist decided the public interest outweighed her own safety — a man who believed he had escaped full accountability will likely spend years more behind bars.

Ros Astengo is a journalist in Gibraltar who writes about politics and social issues. In 2020, when the Parole Board recommended that Allan Grimson be moved to an open prison—a step toward his eventual release after serving more than two decades for murder—she found herself facing a choice that would reshape the trajectory of a case everyone thought was closed.

Grimson had been locked away since 2001 for the sexual abuse and murder of two young Navy men, Nicholas Wright and Sion Jenkins, both in their late teens and early twenties, killed in Portsmouth in the late 1990s. The sentencing judge had called him a serial killer in nature if not by number. But there was something else in the file that troubled Astengo as she began researching a book about another missing sailor, Simon Parkes, who had vanished in Gibraltar in 1986 when Grimson was there. During his original police interviews, Grimson had admitted to sexual contact with four other young men and boys—three sailors and a teenager. The Crown Prosecution Service had never charged him for those offences, reasoning that he was already facing a life sentence and would serve decades regardless.

Astengo was disturbed by what she found. Here was a man about to walk free, having never faced justice for a string of other assaults. She knew the risks. She was putting herself, as she later said, in the crosshairs of a dangerous man. But the alternative—remaining silent while a serial offender returned to the community—felt worse. "It would have been so easy for me to have just done nothing," she said. "But I thought to myself, how would I feel if as soon as they let him out he reoffended and harmed another young man."

She tracked down one of the four men Grimson had assaulted decades earlier. When they met, she found someone still carrying the weight of what had happened—angry, hurt, and only now, as an adult and a parent, beginning to understand that he had been groomed. Astengo told him he could file a fresh complaint. She warned him it would not be easy. He went to the police anyway. When initial inaction followed, Astengo contacted the child sexual abuse review panel, which examines allegations of non-recent offences. The panel agreed the case warranted re-examination. Detectives then tracked down the three other men. In February 2025, Grimson was charged.

The trial that followed, which lasted a month, became a window into how far the criminal justice system has moved. In the 1990s and early 2000s, it was routine for serious sexual allegations to be dropped if a defendant already faced a lengthy sentence for more serious crimes. Now the state considers it its duty to pursue them. The case also illuminated a darker history: until the turn of the century, gay people could not serve openly in the armed forces, meaning some of Grimson's victims had stayed silent out of fear they would be discharged if their assaults became known.

Grimson's legal team argued that charging him now, a quarter-century later, was unfair—a tactic to keep him imprisoned and block his parole. They also attacked Astengo, suggesting she was motivated by profit from her forthcoming book. The prosecutor, John Price KC, urged the jury to disregard what he called conspiracy theories and reminded them that good journalism serves justice. On Monday, the jury found Grimson guilty of 13 sexual offences. Judge Dugdale described him as an extremely dangerous man in the 1990s and ordered reports to assess whether he remains a serious risk today. Sentencing is set for November.

Astengo said the defence's suggestion that she was chasing money was false. Every trip to the UK came out of her own pocket, taken as unpaid leave. She would make little, if anything, from her book. "For me, it was about justice and to prevent a serial offender from being released," she said. The four men who came forward were, in her words, incredibly brave. They had reopened wounds that had never fully healed, brought their trauma back into the light, and stood in court to be heard. Because they did, and because one journalist decided the public interest mattered more than her own safety, a man who thought he had escaped accountability will likely spend years more in prison.

It would have been so easy for me to have just done nothing. But I thought to myself, how would I feel if as soon as they let him out he reoffended and harmed another young man.
— Ros Astengo, journalist
For me, it was about justice and to prevent a serial offender from being released.
— Ros Astengo
Contact Us FAQ