We have verified these abuses happened. The record cannot be erased.
UN verified 31 cases of sexual violence by Israeli forces against Palestinians, including rape and genital mutilation, with 13 cases occurring in 2025. Israel denies allegations and accuses UN Secretary General Guterres of spreading antisemitic lies, threatening to cut off diplomatic contact with his office.
- 31 verified cases of sexual violence by Israeli forces against Palestinians; 13 in 2025, 18 in prior two years
- Victims included 14 men, 7 women, 9 boys, and 1 girl
- Of 52 Israeli military investigations into alleged crimes, only 1 resulted in prison conviction
- Five Israeli guards caught on CCTV at Sde Teiman detention facility; charges dropped in March 2025
- Russia also blacklisted for 310 instances of sexual violence in Ukraine conflict
Israel has been placed on a UN blacklist for sexual violence in warzones for the first time, with 31 verified cases of abuse by Israeli forces against Palestinians. Israel rejected the allegations and threatened to sever ties with the UN secretary general's office.
The United Nations has formally added Israel to its roster of countries credibly documented to have perpetrated sexual violence during armed conflict—a designation that marks the first time the Israeli state has appeared on this particular blacklist. The move comes from a report issued by the office of Secretary General António Guterres, which documented 31 instances of sexual abuse carried out by Israeli military personnel, police officers, and prison staff against Palestinians from Gaza and the West Bank. Thirteen of these cases occurred in 2025; eighteen took place in the two years prior. The victims included fourteen men, seven women, nine boys, and one girl. The violations documented ranged from rape and gang rape to forced nudity and deliberate genital injury.
Israel's response was swift and uncompromising. Ambassador Danny Danon accused Guterres of spreading antisemitic falsehoods and announced that his government would sever diplomatic relations with the secretary general's office for as long as Guterres remains in his position. The Israeli government categorically rejected the allegations of sexual abuse. The UN itself acknowledged that its findings should be understood as "indicative of incidents and patterns" rather than exhaustive—a careful framing that reflects the difficulty of comprehensive investigation in active conflict zones. The organization noted that Israeli authorities had actively obstructed its attempts to conduct fuller inquiries and that detainees had faced threats designed to discourage them from reporting abuse.
The blacklisting did not emerge in a vacuum. Last year, Guterres had placed Israel "on notice," urging the government to investigate mounting allegations and improve conditions in detention facilities. Since that warning, several high-profile cases have surfaced that suggest a troubling pattern. In one instance that drew international attention, five Israeli guards were captured on leaked security camera footage appearing to sexually assault a detainee at the Sde Teiman detention facility. A physician who examined the man afterward documented injuries consistent with the alleged abuse. Despite this evidence and global scrutiny, Israel's top military lawyer dropped charges against the guards in March of this year. When questioned by the BBC, the Israel Prison Service stated it operated in "full accordance with the law" and claimed ignorance of the allegations.
The UN Committee against Torture weighed in separately in November, expressing deep concern about reports suggesting "a de facto state policy of organised and widespread torture and ill treatment" of Palestinian detainees in Israeli custody. The committee noted that allegations had "gravely intensified" following the October 7, 2023 Hamas attacks on Israel. A New York Times investigation based on interviews with fourteen Palestinian survivors of sexual abuse prompted an especially sharp reaction from Israeli leadership. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar jointly announced they were pursuing a defamation lawsuit against the newspaper, characterizing the report as "one of the most hideous and distorted lies ever published against the state of Israel in the modern press."
Human rights organizations have long flagged what they describe as a pattern of impunity. Research by Action on Armed Violence found that nearly nine in ten Israeli military investigations into alleged crimes by soldiers since the Gaza war began had been closed without establishing fault or reaching resolution. Of fifty-two cases examined, only one resulted in a prison sentence. The Israeli military has responded to such criticism by stating that it "conducts examination and investigation processes regarding exceptional incidents" and opens criminal investigations when there is reasonable suspicion of wrongdoing, claiming to act "in accordance with its obligations under Israeli law and international law."
The blacklisting of Israel was not the only addition to the UN's list. Russian armed and security forces were also placed on the roster for the first time, having received a similar warning from Guterres in the previous year. The UN report identified three hundred ten instances of conflict-related sexual violence in Russia and Russian-occupied territories of Ukraine, affecting two hundred eighty men, twenty-six women, and four girls. The violations included rape and genital mutilation. Russia has not publicly responded to the designation. Ukraine's foreign minister, Andrii Sybiha, welcomed the report as "a crucial step on the painful road to truth and accountability." The blacklisting of both nations signals a moment of international reckoning, though the practical consequences remain uncertain given the geopolitical tensions involved.
Notable Quotes
Israel rejected allegations of sexual abuse and announced it would sever diplomatic relations with the UN secretary general's office— Israeli government via Ambassador Danny Danon
A crucial step on the painful road to truth and accountability— Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha, welcoming the report
The Hearth Conversation Another angle on the story
What does it actually mean to be on this blacklist? Does it carry legal weight?
The blacklist itself doesn't trigger automatic sanctions or enforcement mechanisms. It's a formal documentation by the UN that says: we have verified these abuses happened. It's a record, a statement of fact. The real weight comes from what it signals—that the international system is watching, that denial becomes harder, that survivors have institutional acknowledgment.
Why did Israel react so sharply to the secretary general specifically?
Because Guterres had warned them a year earlier. He gave them a chance to investigate themselves, to show accountability. When they didn't—when cases like Sde Teiman happened and charges were dropped—the blacklisting felt like a public indictment of that failure. The accusation of antisemitism is a way of delegitimizing the report itself, not engaging with what's actually documented.
The UN says it couldn't fully investigate because Israel blocked access. How does that affect the credibility of the 31 cases?
It cuts both ways. The 31 cases they did verify are solid—they had evidence, medical documentation, sometimes video. But the obstruction means the actual number is likely much higher. The UN is being conservative in what it claims to know. That's actually more credible than if they'd inflated numbers.
One case resulted in a prison sentence out of fifty-two investigated. That's a stunning statistic.
It is. And it suggests something systemic. You don't get that ratio by accident. Either investigations are designed to fail, or there's institutional protection happening, or both. The military's statement about following proper procedures rings hollow against that data.
What happens now? Does this blacklisting change anything on the ground?
Not immediately. But it creates a record that can't be erased. It makes future denials harder. It gives lawyers and advocates something to point to. Whether it leads to actual accountability—prosecutions, reparations—depends on whether other countries are willing to enforce consequences. Right now, that's an open question.