At the intersection of sport and power, FIFA finds itself in a rare moment of institutional reckoning. Gianni Infantino, having abandoned a controversial plan to commercialize the World Cup through a private subsidiary, now faces the possibility that the retreat itself has accelerated his undoing — with European football associations withdrawing their trust and the mechanisms for his removal quietly assembling. It is a familiar paradox of leadership: the concession meant to calm the storm may instead have revealed how exposed the captain truly is. Football's global future now hangs in a peculi
Infantino faces mounting pressure as FIFA fractures over failed commercial plan
An irreparable loss of trust. Football needs to hit the reset button.
Mark
Why did Infantino's commercial plan fail so spectacularly? It sounds like it should have made FIFA money.
Mimi
It would have made FIFA money—that's partly why it failed. The plan was to sell stakes in World Cup and other tournament revenues to private investors. Member associations saw it as Infantino enriching FIFA's central structure at their expense, and doing it without consulting them. Trust broke.
Mark
So this is about process as much as substance?
Mimi
Entirely. He had the votes to generate record revenue this summer. He had momentum. But he tried to consolidate power without bringing people along. That's what Rettig meant about the loss of trust being irreparable.
Mark
Can he actually be forced out before the March election?
Mimi
Yes. If nineteen of thirty-seven council members call an emergency meeting in the next two weeks, he could resign under pressure. Or UEFA could trigger an Extraordinary Congress with forty-three member associations. But both require coordination, and it's unclear if that will happen.
Mark
Who replaces him if he goes?
Mimi
That's the real problem. The obvious candidates—Ceferin, Al-Khelaifi—have said no. Montagliani might run. Klaveness has supporters but faces skepticism. Salman bin Ibrahim could challenge again. It's genuinely open.
Mark
Does UEFA have the power to force this?
Mimi
UEFA has fifty-five member states out of two hundred eleven total. That's not enough to remove him alone, but it's enough to trigger a Congress or demand an emergency meeting. The question is whether other confederations will join them.
Mark
What happens to football in the meantime?
Mimi
The women's tournaments starting in September will be the first real test. Teams will be competing while FIFA's leadership is in chaos. It's not ideal, but the sport continues.
O Pulso
- Infantino's shelved commercial subsidiary plan, designed to monetize the World Cup through a private vehicle, collapsed under a wave of condemnation so fierce that UEFA suspended its boycott of FIFA events only once the scheme was dead.
- Finland, Wales, and England have formally withdrawn their support for the FIFA president, while Germany's DFB — the world's largest sports association — describes the damage to trust as 'irreparable,' signaling a broader European rupture.
- The machinery of removal is now in motion: nineteen of thirty-seven FIFA Council members could force an emergency meeting within two weeks, and UEFA's fifty-five member states alone hold the power to trigger an Extraordinary Congress at any moment.
- With the March 2027 presidential election in Rabat approaching and the financial leverage Infantino once held over member federations now gone, his path to a final term has narrowed dramatically.
- No credible successor has stepped forward — Al-Khelaifi and Ceferin have both declined, leaving a field of uncertain contenders and FIFA's future direction genuinely unresolved.
At the intersection of sport and power, FIFA finds itself in a rare moment of institutional reckoning. Gianni Infantino, having abandoned a controversial plan to commercialize the World Cup through a private subsidiary, now faces the possibility that the retreat itself has accelerated his undoing — with European football associations withdrawing their trust and the mechanisms for his removal quietly assembling. It is a familiar paradox of leadership: the concession meant to calm the storm may instead have revealed how exposed the captain truly is. Football's global future now hangs in a peculiar suspension, awaiting either a reckoning or a reinvention.
Gianni Infantino's hold on FIFA is visibly weakening. After shelving his plan to commercialize the World Cup through a private subsidiary — abandoned in the face of fierce opposition — the FIFA president now confronts the possibility that the retreat has only emboldened those who wish to see him gone. UEFA lifted its boycott of FIFA events once the scheme was dead, but framed the move as the beginning of a process of "rebuilding trust" — language that reads less like reconciliation and more like a condition.
The fallout has been swift and geographically concentrated in Europe. Finland was the first national federation to publicly withdraw its support. Wales followed, stating that Infantino had failed to put football's interests first. England did the same. Germany's DFB has not yet made a formal break, but its director told a national magazine that the president's conduct has caused damage that cannot be repaired, and that football needs to reset entirely.
The formal mechanisms for removal are now being discussed openly. Nineteen of FIFA's thirty-seven Council members could compel an emergency meeting within two weeks, potentially forcing a resignation. UEFA's fifty-five member states could independently trigger an Extraordinary Congress. A no-confidence vote would require one hundred six votes — a threshold that, for the first time, appears genuinely attainable.
Infantino faces re-election in March 2027 in Rabat. Before his commercial plan unraveled, he seemed almost certain to win — the summer's World Cup generated fifteen billion dollars in revenue, and redistributing that money among member federations had been his most powerful tool of political loyalty. That advantage is now gone.
The question of succession remains deeply unsettled. Nasser Al-Khelaifi has ruled himself out entirely. UEFA president Alexander Ceferin has reportedly shown no interest. Victor Montagliani of Concacaf has expressed past ambitions but has not declared. Norway's Lise Klaveness has supporters within UEFA but faces questions about her broader appeal across FIFA's membership. Salman bin Ibrahim Al Khalifa, who lost to Infantino in 2016, has condemned his actions, though human rights concerns shadowed his previous campaign.
Candidates must declare by November 18. Until then, FIFA governs in a state of suspended uncertainty — its leadership fractured, its succession unclear, and its coming tournaments, from the Women's U20 World Cup in Poland to qualifying matches for Brazil 2027, set to unfold against the backdrop of an organization searching for its center.
Gianni Infantino's grip on FIFA is loosening. The president shelved his plan to commercialize the World Cup through a private subsidiary after a firestorm of opposition, and in doing so, he may have triggered the very forces that could remove him from power before his term ends. UEFA, Europe's football governing body, has lifted its boycott of FIFA events now that the subsidiary scheme is dead. But the reprieve is conditional. UEFA says it is "rebuilding trust"—a phrase that carries the weight of a warning.
The collapse of Infantino's commercial venture has fractured the organization he leads. Finland became the first national federation to publicly withdraw its support for him last week. Wales followed, issuing a statement that the president had failed to "put the best interests of football first." England withdrew its backing the same day. Germany's DFB, the world's largest sports association, has not yet formally abandoned Infantino, but Andreas Rettig, the organization's director, told Stern magazine that the president's actions have caused "an irreparable loss of trust." Rettig added that Infantino has spent considerable time and resources consolidating his own power, and that football needs to "hit the reset button."
The mechanics of removing Infantino are now in play. If nineteen of the thirty-seven members of FIFA's Council call for an emergency meeting within the next two weeks, he could be forced to resign. Several council members, including Germany's Bernd Neuendorf, have already criticized him publicly for failing to consult them about his latest plans. Alternatively, if forty-three national associations formally request an Extraordinary FIFA Congress, one could be convened. UEFA alone has fifty-five member states and could trigger this process at any time. A no-confidence vote would require one hundred six votes to succeed—a threshold that suddenly seems within reach.
Infantino faces re-election on March 18, 2027, at FIFA's Congress in Rabat, Morocco. He needs one hundred six votes from FIFA's two hundred eleven member states to secure a final four-year term. Before his commercial scheme collapsed, he appeared almost certain to win. The World Cup held this summer generated fifteen billion dollars in revenue, far exceeding expectations. That money would have been redistributed among member organizations, strengthening his position. Now that advantage has evaporated.
The question of who might replace him remains unsettled. Nasser Al-Khelaifi, the Paris Saint-Germain chairman and an increasingly influential figure in world football, was widely discussed as a potential challenger. But he has ruled himself out, with his representatives stating he has "absolutely no ambition, no intention, no interest" in the FIFA role. Qatar, notably, remains one of the few federations to have publicly backed Infantino. Alexander Ceferin, UEFA's president, is the most obvious alternative candidate, but he too has reportedly declined interest. Victor Montagliani, who leads Concacaf and speaks four languages, has expressed interest in the role in the past, though it is unclear whether he will run now. Lise Klaveness, the outspoken Norwegian FA president, has supporters within UEFA after reaching the UEFA Executive Committee in 2025, but observers question whether her combative style and gender would appeal to FIFA's broader membership. Salman bin Ibrahim Al Khalifa, the AFC chief who lost to Infantino in 2016, could emerge as a challenger if Asian football breaks ranks with FIFA as European football has done. He has called Infantino's actions "totally unacceptable," though human rights concerns contributed to his previous defeat.
Candidates must declare their intention to run by November 18. Until then, FIFA exists in a state of suspended uncertainty. The women's game will provide the first real test of the organization's stability. The U20 World Cup begins September 5 in Poland, followed by the U17 World Cup in October in Morocco. Qualifying matches for next summer's World Cup in Brazil will also take place that month. These tournaments will unfold against the backdrop of an organization fracturing at its center, its leadership weakened and its future direction unclear.
Citações Notáveis
Infantino has invested considerable time, money, and energy into maintaining his power structure. Many decisions served primarily to consolidate his own position.— Andreas Rettig, DFB Director
Failing to put the best interests of football first is a failure we cannot accept.— Welsh Football Association statement
Quer a matéria completa?
Leia o original em Deutsche Welle ↗
Sports