In the liminal space between trust and deception, an Indonesian businessman named Steven finds himself ensnared in Singapore's legal machinery after 34 counterfeit S$10,000 notes — relics of a denomination discontinued a decade ago — were traced back to casino transactions he made at Resorts World Sentosa in June. Steven's lawyer insists his client was deceived by a man named Anthony, who allegedly offered the notes as payment for a property sale, leaving Steven unwittingly carrying the weight of a sophisticated fraud. The case now sits at the intersection of two nations' investigations, while
Indonesian businessman questioned over S$340k in counterfeit notes at Singapore casino
A victim of fraud, not part of a counterfeit ring
So Steven claims he didn't know the notes were fake—that Anthony gave them to him as payment for a house sale. How does that hold up?
His lawyer says he did due diligence. Rangga supposedly had one note checked at an OCBC branch in Indonesia and confirmed it was genuine. Steven then took it to a money changer in Singapore, who refused it. He went to a bank, tried the casino. At each step, he was trying to legitimize it.
But here's the thing—we don't have confirmation that OCBC actually verified the note. We have Yosia's account of what Rangga said. And once Steven got to Singapore and the money changer turned him down, why didn't that raise a flag? Why keep going?
Fair point. But then Anthony hands him 33 more notes and says they're an inheritance. Steven deposits 27 at the casino. The casino accepted them and exchanged them for chips before anyone caught on. That's on the casino's verification process, not necessarily Steven's judgment.
What about the house purchase in Pamulang? He used six of the notes there too.
Right. The seller's daughter had trouble exchanging them with a money changer in Jakarta. That's when things started to unravel. By June 26, when Steven tried to use six more notes at the casino, the serial numbers matched notes from his earlier visits. That's when security stopped him.
So the casino's own records caught him. But we still don't know who Anthony is or where the counterfeit notes actually originated. Is he part of a larger ring? Is he even real, or is Steven's story a cover?
Indonesian and Singapore police are still investigating. South Tangerang police met with Singapore authorities via Zoom on September 14, but Indonesian investigators have only received a seizure receipt so far—not an official confirmation that the notes are counterfeit.
That's interesting. So the legal status of the notes isn't even formally settled between the two countries yet?
Exactly. Yosia's argument is that Steven is a victim, not a perpetrator. But he's also the one who deposited the notes, used them, and tried to pay for a house with them. The question of intent matters enormously here, and we don't have enough to know it yet.
Singapore law is clear though—conviction for using counterfeit currency carries up to 20 years. Steven's facing investigation for circulating counterfeit notes, using them, and bringing in undeclared cash. Even if he's telling the truth, the legal exposure is enormous.
And he's stuck in Singapore for three to six months while they sort it out.
Which is the real story—not whether Steven is guilty or innocent, but how quickly someone can get caught in a cross-border fraud scheme and lose months of their life to investigation, regardless of their actual culpability.
Le Pouls
- Thirty-four counterfeit notes from a discontinued denomination — each bearing a face value of S$10,000 — moved through a casino's hands before anyone raised an alarm, exposing a gap between trust and verification.
- Steven's story of a Jakarta café handshake, a friend's assurance, and a VIP casino host's convenience creates a chain of plausible steps that nonetheless led him directly into a criminal investigation.
- Singapore and Indonesian police are now coordinating across borders, yet Indonesian investigators have received only a vague seizure receipt rather than formal confirmation of counterfeiting, leaving the two sides working from different evidentiary footing.
- The man allegedly at the center of it all — Anthony — remains in Indonesia, claiming he has no passport, while Steven is the one who cannot leave Singapore for up to six months.
- With precedent already set by a recent seven-month sentence for a single counterfeit note, Steven faces the prospect of decades in prison if prosecutors determine his ignorance was not genuine.
In the liminal space between trust and deception, an Indonesian businessman named Steven finds himself ensnared in Singapore's legal machinery after 34 counterfeit S$10,000 notes — relics of a denomination discontinued a decade ago — were traced back to casino transactions he made at Resorts World Sentosa in June. Steven's lawyer insists his client was deceived by a man named Anthony, who allegedly offered the notes as payment for a property sale, leaving Steven unwittingly carrying the weight of a sophisticated fraud. The case now sits at the intersection of two nations' investigations, while Steven waits in Singapore, passport surrendered, facing charges that could carry up to twenty years in prison.
An Indonesian businessman known as Steven is cooperating with Singapore authorities after 34 counterfeit S$10,000 notes — a denomination discontinued by Singapore's central bank in 2014 — were exchanged for casino chips at Resorts World Sentosa across three visits in June. Casino staff eventually detected the forgeries, and Steven was stopped by security and police during a later visit on June 26.
According to his lawyer, Yosia Ginting, Steven received the notes as payment for a shophouse he was selling in South Tangerang, near Jakarta. A man named Anthony, introduced through a mutual friend called Rangga, first handed Steven a single note at a Jakarta café on June 8, claiming it was old currency he wished to exchange. Rangga vouched that the note had been verified at an OCBC branch in Indonesia. When Steven traveled to Singapore the following day and found money changers unwilling to accept it due to its large denomination, a VIP host at Resorts World Sentosa suggested the casino could handle the exchange — and it did.
On June 11, Anthony returned with 33 more notes, claiming they were an inheritance and that he intended to use them to purchase Steven's shophouse, valued at roughly S$323,500. Steven carried 27 of the notes to Singapore on June 12 and deposited them into his casino account, keeping six at home in Indonesia. Those six notes later surfaced when Steven used them as partial payment for a house in Pamulang — a transaction that caused difficulty when the seller's daughter tried to exchange them at a Jakarta money changer.
On June 26, Steven flew to Singapore with family and the seller's daughter to resolve the payment. That afternoon, after participating in a baccarat tournament, he was stopped by casino security. Staff had matched the serial numbers on six notes he carried to those from his earlier deposits. He was taken to Police Cantonment Complex, surrendered his passport and phone, and was told he must remain in Singapore for three to six months during the investigation.
Steven now faces potential charges of circulating counterfeit currency and money laundering, offenses that carry sentences of up to 20 years under Singapore law. His lawyer maintains he is a fraud victim with no ties to any counterfeiting operation. Indonesian police have been in contact with Singapore authorities, though they have yet to receive formal confirmation that the notes are counterfeit. Anthony, meanwhile, remains in Indonesia and has not been publicly charged.
An Indonesian businessman identified as Steven is cooperating with Singapore authorities in an investigation centered on 34 counterfeit S$10,000 notes that were allegedly exchanged for casino chips at Resorts World Sentosa over three separate visits in June. The notes, which date from 1973 and were discontinued by Singapore's central bank in 2014, were accepted and converted to chips before casino staff detected they were fake.
According to Steven's lawyer, Yosia Ginting, his client received the Singapore currency as payment for a shophouse he was selling in South Tangerang, a town outside Jakarta. The notes came from a man named Anthony, who was introduced through one of Steven's friends called Rangga. At a June 8 meeting at a Jakarta café, Anthony handed Steven a single S$10,000 note, claiming he wanted to exchange it because it was old. Rangga assured Steven the note had been verified as genuine at an OCBC branch in Indonesia. When Steven traveled to Singapore the next day, a money changer refused to accept the note due to its large denomination. A bank told him he would need to open an account to exchange it for smaller bills, which he declined to do. Instead, a VIP host at Resorts World Sentosa suggested he change the note at the casino, where it was allegedly verified and exchanged for chips.
Three days later, on June 11, Anthony met Steven again in Jakarta and handed him 33 additional S$10,000 notes, claiming they were an inheritance from his parents. Anthony indicated he wanted to purchase Steven's shophouse, which was listed at 4.5 billion rupiah, approximately S$323,500. He said he would pay once Steven returned from Singapore with the currency converted to smaller denominations. On June 12, Steven traveled to Singapore and deposited 27 of the counterfeit notes into his casino account. He kept six notes in Indonesia.
When Anthony later asked for the money in smaller denominations, Steven suggested they travel to Singapore together to collect it. Anthony refused, saying he lacked a passport and had business obligations in Indonesia. On June 22, Steven used six of the counterfeit notes he had kept at home as partial payment for a house in Pamulang, in Banteng province, which he had purchased in May 2025. The seller's daughter encountered difficulty exchanging the notes with a money changer in Jakarta.
On June 26, Steven flew to Singapore with his wife, their children, and the seller's daughter, intending to complete the house payment. He told the seller that the S$10,000 notes could only be converted to smaller denominations at the casino in Singapore. When the seller's daughter realized she could not legally bring more than S$6,000 into Indonesia, she asked Steven to arrange a bank transfer instead. That afternoon, after Steven participated in a baccarat tournament at the casino, security and police stopped him. Casino staff informed him that the serial numbers on six of the notes matched some of the 28 notes he had exchanged during his earlier visits.
Steven was taken to Police Cantonment Complex for questioning. He was informed he was being investigated for bringing in a large sum of cash without declaration, circulating counterfeit currency, and using counterfeit notes. He surrendered his passport and mobile phone and was told he would need to remain in Singapore for three to six months while police completed their investigation. His lawyer maintains that Steven is a victim of fraud orchestrated by Anthony and has no connection to any counterfeit money operation. South Tangerang police have been coordinating with Singapore authorities, though Indonesian investigators have so far received only a seizure receipt describing the notes as "believed to be non genuine" rather than an official confirmation of counterfeiting.
The S$10,000 note, first issued in 1973, was discontinued in 2014 as part of Singapore's effort to reduce money laundering and terrorism financing risks. The Monetary Authority of Singapore has noted that discontinuing high-denomination notes is standard practice in other jurisdictions. Over recent years, multiple individuals have faced prosecution in Singapore for attempting to use counterfeit versions of these large-denomination notes. In February, a 22-year-old Indonesian man was sentenced to seven months in jail after attempting to deposit a counterfeit S$10,000 note in his uncle's bank account. Those convicted of using forged or counterfeit banknotes in Singapore face potential sentences of up to 20 years imprisonment.
Citations marquantes
Steven is a victim of fraud and is not part of a counterfeit money ring.— Yosia Ginting, Steven's lawyer
The discontinuation of high-denomination notes was a pre-emptive move to mitigate money laundering and terrorism financing risks.— Monetary Authority of Singapore, 2020 statement