Thirty years ago, a child born in India and one born in Pakistan could expect to share roughly the same fate in years lived. Today, that shared horizon has split: the Indian child will likely reach their mid-seventies, while the Pakistani child may not see sixty-eight. This five-year divergence in life expectancy is not a statistical curiosity but a ledger of choices, institutions, and investments — or their absence — accumulated across decades of divergent governance and economic stewardship.
India's 5-year life expectancy edge over Pakistan reflects deeper economic divide
The gap between India and Pakistan is not merely economic
Mark
So this five-year life expectancy gap—is that something that happened suddenly, or has it been building for a while?
Mimi
It's been building steadily. In the mid-1990s, both countries were at about 60 years. India's climbed to 73, Pakistan's to 67. That's a slow accumulation of better healthcare, nutrition, sanitation—the basics that let people live longer.
Luke
But we should be careful here. Life expectancy is an average. It tells us something real about population health, but it doesn't tell us whether the gap is driven by infant mortality, chronic disease, or something else entirely. The source doesn't break that down.
Mark
Fair point. What about the debt situation—is Pakistan in crisis, or is this manageable?
Mimi
The numbers suggest real strain. Debt-to-GDP at 70 percent is substantial. The fact that it's climbing even as the government tries to cut spending suggests the economy isn't growing fast enough to absorb the borrowing.
Luke
Right, but "crisis" is a loaded word. Pakistan has been in high-debt situations before and managed. The source says growth was lower than expected, partly because inflation was lower. That's not necessarily catastrophic—it's actually a sign of price stability. The real question is whether structural reforms happen, and we don't know that yet.
Mark
So what does this mean for ordinary Pakistanis?
Mimi
It means less public investment in the things that would improve life expectancy—schools, hospitals, water systems. It means more of the government budget goes to servicing debt instead of building capacity.
Luke
That's a reasonable inference, but the source doesn't explicitly say how the debt is affecting spending on health or education. We're connecting dots that the reporting hasn't fully drawn.
Mark
Is there any sign Pakistan is turning this around?
Mimi
The domestic debt growth did slow to its lowest rate in three years, which suggests some fiscal discipline is working. But external debt is still climbing, and the reliance on IMF and multilateral loans means Pakistan is still dependent on outside help.
Luke
Which is true, but it's also worth noting that IMF programs, while constraining, often come with conditions designed to improve fiscal health. We don't know yet whether those conditions will actually stick or produce results.
The Pulse
- A gap that once did not exist has quietly grown into five years of human life separating the average Indian from the average Pakistani, a divergence that began in the mid-1990s and has only accelerated since.
- Pakistan's public debt has swelled to $286.8 billion — 70% of GDP — climbing nearly 13% in a single year even as the government attempted to cut spending, revealing an economy that cannot grow fast enough to outrun its borrowing.
- External creditors, led by the IMF and multilateral lenders, now underpin Pakistan's fiscal survival, with the federal government shouldering 84% of external obligations and provinces like Sindh seeing their debt surge sharply.
- India's economy, now roughly twice Pakistan's size, continues to pull ahead — not just in output but in the compounding human advantages of better nutrition, healthcare, sanitation, and education that longer lives both reflect and reinforce.
- Unless Pakistan enacts structural reforms to taxation, spending, and growth capacity — changes that have repeatedly stalled — analysts warn the fiscal pressure will persist and the quality-of-life gap with India will widen further.
Thirty years ago, a child born in India and one born in Pakistan could expect to share roughly the same fate in years lived. Today, that shared horizon has split: the Indian child will likely reach their mid-seventies, while the Pakistani child may not see sixty-eight. This five-year divergence in life expectancy is not a statistical curiosity but a ledger of choices, institutions, and investments — or their absence — accumulated across decades of divergent governance and economic stewardship.
Three decades ago, an Indian and a Pakistani born in the same year could expect to live to roughly the same age. Today, that Indian will likely see their seventies while the Pakistani will not — a five-year gap that has opened quietly but unmistakably since 1994-95, when life expectancy stood at around 60 years for both nations. By 2025, India's average had reached 73; Pakistan's, 67. Economist Shamika Ravi, advising India's Prime Minister, framed the divergence plainly: the gap is not merely economic but reflects fundamental differences in quality of life — nutrition, healthcare, sanitation, and the basic infrastructure that allows populations to flourish.
On the economic ledger, the picture is equally stark. India's economy is now roughly twice the size of Pakistan's, a distance that has grown steadily over the decades. Pakistan, meanwhile, finds itself caught in a borrowing cycle with no clear exit. By June 2025, total public debt had reached $286.8 billion — or 80.6 trillion Pakistani rupees — representing a year-on-year increase of nearly 13 percent. Domestic borrowing climbed to 54.5 trillion rupees, while external debt stood at $91.8 billion, sustained largely by IMF support, a commercial loan backed by the Asian Development Bank, and other multilateral lenders. The federal government carries 84 percent of external obligations; among provinces, Punjab leads at $6.18 billion, followed by Sindh, whose debt rose sharply over the past year.
What makes the burden particularly acute is its relationship to the economy itself. Public debt now equals 70 percent of GDP, up from 68 percent a year earlier — a ratio that continued rising even as the government pursued fiscal consolidation. The Ministry of Finance attributed the climb to slower-than-expected growth, driven by lower inflation that compressed the economy's nominal expansion. The underlying engine, in other words, is not generating enough momentum to outpace the borrowing it depends upon.
The human cost of this divergence compounds across generations. A five-year gap in life expectancy means more Indian children surviving to adulthood, more years in school, more productive decades in the workforce, more wealth accumulated and reinvested in the next generation. Pakistan's continued reliance on IMF bailouts signals that the structural reforms needed — in taxation, public spending, and growth capacity — remain elusive. The question hanging over both nations is whether Pakistan can reverse its trajectory before the distance between them becomes too wide to meaningfully close.
Three decades ago, an Indian and a Pakistani born in the same year could reasonably expect to live to roughly the same age. Today, that Indian will likely see their seventies while the Pakistani will not. The gap has widened to five years—a measure not of accident or chance, but of the economic paths the two nations have taken since independence.
Professor Shamika Ravi, an economist serving on India's Economic Advisory Committee to the Prime Minister, laid out the divergence in stark terms. In 1994-95, life expectancy stood at approximately 60 years for both countries. By 2025, Indians averaged 73 years while Pakistanis averaged 67. The shift reflects something deeper than mortality statistics: it speaks to nutrition, healthcare access, sanitation, education, and the basic infrastructure that allows a population to thrive. "The gap between India and Pakistan is not merely economic," Ravi observed. "It's also in terms of fundamental quality of life."
On the economic ledger, the disparity is equally pronounced. India's economy is roughly twice the size of Pakistan's, a gap that has only widened as the decades have passed. Pakistan, meanwhile, finds itself trapped in a cycle of borrowing that shows no sign of breaking. By June 2025, the country's total public debt had climbed to 286.832 billion dollars—equivalent to 80.6 trillion Pakistani rupees. This represented a year-on-year increase of nearly 13 percent, according to official figures from Pakistan's Ministry of Finance.
The composition of that debt tells its own story. Domestic borrowing reached 54.5 trillion rupees, up 15 percent from the previous year, though this marked the slowest annual increase in three years. External debt stood at 91.8 billion dollars, with new money flowing primarily from the International Monetary Fund, a billion-dollar commercial loan backed by the Asian Development Bank, and other multilateral lenders. The federal government shoulders 84 percent of external obligations, while provinces carry the remaining 16 percent. Punjab leads the provincial borrowing at 6.18 billion dollars, followed by Sindh at 4.67 billion dollars—a figure that jumped sharply over the past year. Khyber Pakhtunkhwa's external debt reached 2.77 billion dollars, while Baluchistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir held smaller amounts of 371 million and 281 million dollars respectively.
What makes the debt burden particularly acute is the ratio it now represents relative to the economy itself. Public debt has climbed to 70 percent of GDP as of June 2025, up from 68 percent a year earlier. The Ministry of Finance attributed this rise to slower-than-expected economic growth, driven largely by lower inflation that reduced the nominal expansion of the economy. Even as the government pursued fiscal consolidation—cutting spending and tightening budgets—the debt ratio continued to climb, a sign that the underlying economic engine is not generating sufficient growth to outpace borrowing.
The contrast between the two nations extends beyond numbers on a balance sheet. A five-year gap in life expectancy compounds across generations. It means Indian children are more likely to survive to adulthood, to attend school, to enter the workforce with better health. It means Indian families accumulate more wealth, invest more in their children's futures, and contribute more to economic growth. Pakistan's reliance on repeated IMF bailouts and multilateral lending suggests the country faces sustained fiscal pressure that will require structural economic reforms—changes to taxation, spending, and growth-generating capacity that have proven difficult to implement. The question now is whether Pakistan can reverse the trajectory before the gap widens further.
Notable Quotes
The gap between India and Pakistan is not merely economic. It's also in terms of fundamental quality of life. Indians now live 5 years longer than Pakistanis on average.— Professor Shamika Ravi, economist and member of India's Economic Advisory Committee
Want the full story?
Read the original at Business Today ↗
Politics & Governance