In the long negotiation between nations over who bears the cost of commerce, India has drawn a quiet but firm line: its exporters must stand on higher ground than their Asian rivals before New Delhi opens the first door of its trade agreement with Washington. Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal's condition — that Indian goods face lower American tariffs than those from ASEAN and neighboring competitors — reflects a country that sees itself not as a supplicant but as a strategic partner with alternatives. Nearly six months after the bilateral framework was announced, India is demonstrating that pati
India conditions US trade deal on tariff advantage over competitors
India won't activate the deal unless it gets tariff advantage over competitors
So India is saying it won't activate the US trade deal until it gets better tariff treatment than competitors. That's a pretty direct condition to put on the table.
It is, but it makes sense from India's perspective. If you're opening your market to American goods, you want your own exports to have a real advantage going the other way. Otherwise, why sign the deal at all?
But here's what I want to know — does India actually have the leverage to demand this? The US has already started imposing tariffs on Indian goods under Section 301. That's a sign the US might not be in a mood to hand out favors.
True, but those tariffs are narrow — 10 percent on forced labor, and the excess capacity probe is still ongoing. They're not across-the-board. India seems to be betting that the US wants a broader trade relationship more than it wants to keep squeezing on individual issues.
What about the EU deal and the Oman and UK agreements? Are those moving faster?
The EU deal is in legal review, so it's close but not done. The Oman and UK deals are already done — zero-duty access. So India has some wins on the board while it waits for the US to meet its conditions.
The question is timing. How long will India wait? And what happens if the US decides to impose more tariffs while negotiations drag on? That could change the calculus pretty quickly.
So this is really about who blinks first.
Exactly. India is saying it has other options. The US has to decide if the deal is worth giving India what it wants.
And we don't actually know what the US response is yet. This is India's opening position. The real negotiation hasn't happened in public.
The Pulse
- India will not activate the first tranche of its US trade deal until Washington guarantees Indian exports a tariff edge over ASEAN and regional rivals — a condition that puts the opening move squarely in America's court.
- The US has already imposed a 10% tariff on certain Indian imports following a forced labor investigation, and a second probe into excess manufacturing capacity under Section 301 remains unresolved, adding friction to an already complex negotiation.
- When pressed on potential new US tariffs tied to Indian purchases of Russian oil, Goyal refused to engage — a silence that signals either ongoing sensitivity or deliberate strategic ambiguity.
- India is not waiting idly: the India-EU free trade agreement is clearing its final legal hurdles, while zero-duty access through new deals with Oman and the United Kingdom is already drawing optimism from Indian exporters.
- The emerging picture is one of calculated patience — India holding firm with the US while quietly advancing trade relationships that reduce its dependence on any single outcome.
In the long negotiation between nations over who bears the cost of commerce, India has drawn a quiet but firm line: its exporters must stand on higher ground than their Asian rivals before New Delhi opens the first door of its trade agreement with Washington. Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal's condition — that Indian goods face lower American tariffs than those from ASEAN and neighboring competitors — reflects a country that sees itself not as a supplicant but as a strategic partner with alternatives. Nearly six months after the bilateral framework was announced, India is demonstrating that patience, when backed by leverage, is its own form of power.
India's Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal set a clear condition this week for moving forward with the United States on trade: Indian exporters must receive better tariff treatment than their competitors across Asia before the first phase of the bilateral agreement takes effect. The India-US Bilateral Trade Agreement was announced in a joint statement on February 7, 2026, but nearly six months on, New Delhi is signaling it will not activate the opening tranche without what Goyal called a "comparative advantage on comparable duties" — Indian goods entering the American market should face lower tariffs than those from ASEAN nations and neighboring countries.
The demand reflects India's broader negotiating posture as it manages several trade relationships at once. On the American side, the picture is already complicated: the US has imposed a 10% tariff on certain Indian imports following a forced labor investigation under Section 301 of the US Trade Act, and a separate probe into excess manufacturing capacity remains ongoing. Goyal confirmed India's participation in those proceedings, suggesting engagement even as New Delhi holds firm on its conditions for the larger deal. Asked about reports of potential tariffs linked to Indian purchases of Russian oil, the minister declined to comment — a deliberate silence that leaves India's position on that front unreadable.
Elsewhere, India's trade agenda looks more advanced. The India-EU free trade agreement is nearing the end of its legal review, after which it moves to the European Parliament and member institutions for formal approval. And Indian exporters are already expressing optimism about zero-duty access secured through new agreements with Oman and the United Kingdom — arrangements that allow Indian goods to compete on price and quality alone, free of import duties.
The strategy that emerges is one of a country that believes it holds leverage. India is holding its position with Washington, waiting for legal processes to conclude with Europe, and already positioned to benefit from tariff-free entry in two new markets. The message to the US is implicit but clear: the deal matters, but not so much that India will accept terms that leave its exporters at a disadvantage.
India's Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal laid out a clear condition for moving forward with the United States on trade this week: Washington must first ensure that Indian exporters get better tariff treatment than their competitors across Asia before the first phase of a bilateral trade agreement takes effect.
Goyal, speaking on Thursday, framed the requirement as straightforward economic logic. India and the US had announced the proposed Bilateral Trade Agreement in a joint statement on February 7, 2026. Now, nearly six months later, India is signaling it will not activate the opening tranche of that deal unless New Delhi gains what Goyal called a "comparative advantage on comparable duties" — meaning Indian goods should face lower tariffs than those from neighboring countries and ASEAN nations when entering the American market. The minister said India would continue to pursue opportunities in the US market, but only under those conditions.
The tariff advantage demand reflects India's negotiating position as it balances multiple trade relationships simultaneously. The US has already moved on its own investigations into Indian imports. Under Section 301 of the US Trade Act, American authorities have launched probes into forced labor practices and excess capacity in Indian manufacturing. The US has already imposed a 10 percent tariff following its forced labor investigation, and another examination into excess capacity remains underway. Goyal confirmed that India had participated in those proceedings, suggesting New Delhi is engaged in the process even as it sets conditions for the broader trade deal.
When asked about reports that the US might impose additional tariffs on imports linked to Russian oil, Goyal declined to engage, calling the matter speculative. The refusal to comment suggests either that negotiations are still fluid on that front or that India prefers not to signal its position publicly while discussions continue.
Meanwhile, India is advancing other trade relationships that appear closer to completion. The India-European Union free trade agreement is nearing the end of its legal review process, Goyal said. Once that review concludes, the agreement will move to the European Parliament and other relevant institutions across the 27-member bloc for formal approval. That timeline remains uncertain, but the minister's language suggested the finish line is visible.
On the export side, Indian business groups are expressing optimism about two newer trade arrangements. India has finalized free trade agreements with Oman and the United Kingdom that provide zero-duty access for Indian exports to both markets. Following a meeting with Export Promotion Councils, Goyal noted that exporters see real opportunity in those agreements to expand shipments without facing tariff barriers. For Indian manufacturers and exporters, zero-duty access is the gold standard — it means their goods can compete on price and quality alone, without the handicap of import duties.
The picture that emerges is one of India playing a careful hand across multiple trade fronts. With the US, it is holding firm on wanting preferential treatment before committing to the first phase of a larger deal. With Europe, it is waiting for legal machinery to complete its work. With Oman and the UK, it is already positioned to benefit from tariff-free entry. The strategy suggests India believes it has leverage — that Washington needs the deal enough to grant the tariff advantage Goyal is demanding, and that India can afford to wait while other trade relationships mature.
Notable Quotes
India will continue to leverage opportunities in the US market as long as it has a comparative advantage on comparable duties— Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal