IML rules out sexual violence in Vitória case; confirms death by stabbing

17-year-old Vitória Regina de Sousa was murdered by stabbing after being stalked and abducted by a rejected suitor, found dead in a wooded area on March 5, 2025.
He had been watching, waiting—the kind of persistent attention that leaves no room to simply live
Maicol Sales dos Santos stalked Vitória Regina de Sousa before abducting and killing her on February 26th.

Uma jovem de dezessete anos, Vitória Regina de Sousa, foi morta a facadas em Cajamar, na Grande São Paulo, após ser interceptada por um homem que não aceitou sua rejeição. O laudo do Instituto Médico Legal confirmou a causa da morte e afastou a hipótese de violência sexual, enquanto o suspeito, preso e interrogado, confessou o crime motivado por vingança. O caso coloca diante de nós uma realidade que se repete com frequência dolorosa: a vida de uma mulher interrompida pelo ódio de quem não soube aceitar um não.

  • Vitória saiu do trabalho no dia 26 de fevereiro e nunca chegou em casa — oito dias depois, seu corpo foi encontrado em uma área de mata, e a faca usada no crime jamais foi localizada.
  • Registros de celular revelam que o suspeito visualizou uma foto postada por ela na parada de ônibus minutos antes do desaparecimento, indicando que a interceptação foi premeditada, não casual.
  • O laudo do IML encerrou uma linha de investigação ao confirmar que não houve violência sexual, estabelecendo as três facadas como causa da morte.
  • Maicol Sales dos Santos confessou o crime em interrogatório no dia 17 de março, admitindo que matou Vitória por vingança após ser rejeitado por ela.
  • A investigação segue aberta enquanto a polícia aguarda laudos complementares e finaliza os procedimentos para o encerramento do inquérito.

O laudo do Instituto Médico Legal chegou à delegacia de Cajamar com uma conclusão definitiva: Vitória Regina de Sousa, dezessete anos, morreu em decorrência de três facadas. O exame afastou a ocorrência de violência sexual, encerrando uma das linhas de investigação enquanto o inquérito seguia seu curso.

Vitória havia desaparecido no dia 26 de fevereiro, após sair do trabalho e embarcar em um ônibus rumo a casa. Seu corpo foi encontrado oito dias depois, em uma área de mata em Cajamar, na Grande São Paulo. A faca usada no crime nunca foi localizada.

O suspeito, Maicol Sales dos Santos, morava no mesmo bairro que a vítima e a monitorava sistematicamente — acompanhava suas redes sociais e seus deslocamentos cotidianos. Registros telefônicos indicam que ele visualizou uma foto postada por Vitória na parada de ônibus minutos antes do desaparecimento, sugerindo que a interceptou de forma premeditada no caminho de volta para casa.

Preso em 8 de março, Maicol confessou o crime em interrogatório realizado no dia 17. Segundo os investigadores, ele a sequestrou e matou por vingança, após ter sido rejeitado por ela. A rejeição havia se transformado em obsessão, e a obsessão, em violência. O motivo — a incapacidade de aceitar um não — está no centro da morte de uma jovem que simplesmente queria voltar para casa depois do trabalho.

A investigação prossegue. A polícia aguarda laudos periciais complementares e conclui os procedimentos finais antes do encerramento do inquérito.

The medical examiner's report arrived at the Cajamar police station with a single, definitive conclusion: Vitória Regina de Sousa, seventeen years old, died from three stab wounds. There was no sexual violence. The forensic document, delivered to investigators by the state's technical-scientific police division, closed one avenue of inquiry while the larger investigation into her death pressed forward.

Vitória vanished on February 26th after leaving work. She boarded a bus headed home in Cajamar, a municipality in the greater São Paulo area, and never arrived. Eight days later, on March 5th, her body was discovered in a wooded area nearby. She was naked. Her head had been shaved. The knife used to kill her was never found.

The suspect, Maicol Sales dos Santos, lived in the same neighborhood. He had been watching her—following her movements, tracking her social media, positioning himself in her daily geography. On the afternoon she disappeared, phone records showed he had viewed a photograph Vitória posted from the bus stop just minutes before she went missing. The timing suggested he had intercepted her on her route home, not by chance but by design.

Police arrested him on March 8th. When questioned on the evening of March 17th, he confessed. According to investigators, he had abducted and killed her out of revenge. She had rejected him. The rejection festered into obsession, and obsession into violence. He had been stalking her, watching, waiting—the kind of persistent, unwanted attention that leaves no room for the victim to simply live her life.

The forensic examination of her body was thorough. The medical examiner's report specifically noted that the genital and perineal regions showed no traumatic injuries of medical-legal significance. This finding, clinical and precise, meant that whatever else had happened to Vitória in her final hours, sexual assault was not part of it. The three stab wounds were the cause of death. That was what the evidence showed.

The investigation continues. Police are still waiting for additional forensic results and completing remaining procedures before the case file closes. The suspect has been interrogated and has confessed. The weapon remains missing. The motive—rejection, obsession, the rage of a man who could not accept being told no—sits at the center of what happened to a seventeen-year-old girl who simply wanted to go home from work.

He sequestered and killed Vitória out of revenge after being rejected, acting as a stalker from the same neighborhood
— Cajamar Police Civil Division
The Hearth Conversation Another angle on the story
Inventor

Why does the medical examiner's report matter so much here? It seems like the confession already established what happened.

Model

The report closes a door. In cases like this, people speculate wildly—they imagine the worst possible versions of events. The forensic finding removes one category of horror from the story, even as the core tragedy remains unchanged. It's about establishing what actually occurred versus what fear imagines.

Inventor

The phone evidence—viewing a photo at the bus stop—that's the detail that suggests premeditation, isn't it?

Model

Exactly. It's not a chance encounter. He was monitoring her in real time, positioned to intercept her. That's the difference between a crime of passion and something more calculated. He knew where she would be because he was watching.

Inventor

How long was she missing before they found her?

Model

Eight days. February 26th to March 5th. Her family had no idea where she was during that time. The body was found in a wooded area, which suggests he took her somewhere isolated, away from witnesses.

Inventor

And he lived in the same neighborhood?

Model

Same neighborhood. Close enough to watch her routines, to know when she left work, which bus she took. That proximity is part of what made the stalking possible—and what made it inescapable for her.

Inventor

The shaved head—what does that suggest?

Model

Degradation, control, erasure of identity. It's a violent act layered on top of the killing itself. It speaks to rage, to a need to unmake her in some way beyond just ending her life.

Contact Us FAQ